Evaluation of maritime spatial planning for offshore wind energy in the Canary Islands: A comparative analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Martin-Betancor, M. [1 ]
Osorio, J. [2 ]
Ruiz-Garcia, A. [3 ]
Nuez, I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Cartog & Graphic Express Engn, Campus Univ Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain
[2] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Business Adm & Management, Campus Univ Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain
[3] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Elect Engn & Automation, Campus Univ Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain
关键词
Wind energy; Offshore; Maritime spatial planning; GIS; Small islands;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Following a European Union directive, European countries with territorial waters have developed their maritime spatial planning (MSP). One of the objectives of MSP is to identify areas with high potential for the development of offshore wind energy (OWE). In one of Spain's maritime regions, the official planning of suitable areas for OWE generation differs significantly from the results of previous scientific studies. The region is the Canary Islands, an archipelago of small islands with a high population density and land scarcity. The aim of this study is to identify suitable marine areas for OWE in this region and to compare them with the suitable sites identified in the official MSP and with previous academic studies. This work adopts the framework proposed by the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory for OWE assessment. The results show that less than 1% of the marine area can be used for OWE generation. One conclusion of this study is that the official MSP of the Canary Islands territory includes marine areas that are not suitable for OWE generation. Another conclusion is that deciding on suitable sites for OWE should involve negotiation between stakeholders and allow for some flexibility in marine use.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The politics of Estonia's offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning
    Tafon, Ralph
    Howarth, David
    Griggs, Steven
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2019, 37 (01) : 157 - 176
  • [32] Maritime Security and the Wind: Threats and Risks to Offshore Renewable Energy Infrastructure
    Bueger, Christian
    Edmunds, Timothy
    OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2024, 38 (01): : 433 - 458
  • [33] Analysis of the economic feasibility of different floating offshore renewable energies in Canary Islands
    Filgueira-Vizoso A.
    Costoya X.
    Cordal-Iglesias D.
    Piegari L.
    Tricoli P.
    Castro-Santos L.
    Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 2022, 20 : 525 - 529
  • [34] Rationale for selecting the most suitable areas for offshore wind energy farms in isolated island systems. Case study: Canary Islands
    Yanez-Rosales, Pablo
    Del Rio-Gamero, B.
    Schallenberg-Rodriguez, Julieta
    ENERGY, 2024, 307
  • [35] The importance of monitoring and evaluation in adaptive maritime spatial planning
    Douvere, Fanny
    Ehler, Charles N.
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 15 (02) : 305 - 311
  • [36] The importance of monitoring and evaluation in adaptive maritime spatial planning
    Fanny Douvere
    Charles N. Ehler
    Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2011, 15 : 305 - 311
  • [37] EVALUATION OF OFFSHORE SITE FOR WIND ENERGY GENERATION
    KIRSCHBAUM, HS
    SOMERS, EV
    SULZBERGER, VT
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1976, 95 (06): : 1763 - 1763
  • [38] EVALUATION OF OFFSHORE SITE FOR WIND ENERGY GENERATION
    KIRSCHBAUM, HS
    SOMERS, EV
    SULZBERGER, VT
    COMBUSTION, 1976, 48 (01): : 8 - 8
  • [39] A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)
    Diaz, Hugo
    Soares, Carlos Guedes
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [40] Spatial energy planning of offshore wind farms in Greece using GIS and a hybrid MCDM methodological approach
    Spyridonidou, Sofia
    Vagiona, Dimitra G.
    EURO-MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION, 2020, 5 (02)