Evaluation of maritime spatial planning for offshore wind energy in the Canary Islands: A comparative analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Martin-Betancor, M. [1 ]
Osorio, J. [2 ]
Ruiz-Garcia, A. [3 ]
Nuez, I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Cartog & Graphic Express Engn, Campus Univ Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain
[2] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Business Adm & Management, Campus Univ Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain
[3] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Elect Engn & Automation, Campus Univ Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain
关键词
Wind energy; Offshore; Maritime spatial planning; GIS; Small islands;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Following a European Union directive, European countries with territorial waters have developed their maritime spatial planning (MSP). One of the objectives of MSP is to identify areas with high potential for the development of offshore wind energy (OWE). In one of Spain's maritime regions, the official planning of suitable areas for OWE generation differs significantly from the results of previous scientific studies. The region is the Canary Islands, an archipelago of small islands with a high population density and land scarcity. The aim of this study is to identify suitable marine areas for OWE in this region and to compare them with the suitable sites identified in the official MSP and with previous academic studies. This work adopts the framework proposed by the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory for OWE assessment. The results show that less than 1% of the marine area can be used for OWE generation. One conclusion of this study is that the official MSP of the Canary Islands territory includes marine areas that are not suitable for OWE generation. Another conclusion is that deciding on suitable sites for OWE should involve negotiation between stakeholders and allow for some flexibility in marine use.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gravity analysis offshore the Canary Islands from a systematic survey
    Carbó, A
    Muñoz-Martín, A
    Llanes, P
    Alvarez, J
    MARINE GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 24 (1-2) : 113 - 127
  • [22] Gravity analysis offshore the Canary Islands from a systematic survey
    A. Carbó
    A. Muñoz-Martín
    P. Llanes
    J. Álvarez
    Marine Geophysical Researches, 2003, 24 : 113 - 127
  • [23] Offshore wind energy: A comparative analysis of UK, USA and India
    Kota, Sandhya
    Bayne, Stephen B.
    Nimmagadda, Sandeep
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 41 : 685 - 694
  • [24] Offshore Energy and Marine Spatial Planning
    Penick, Van
    OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2019, 33 (01): : 636 - 640
  • [25] Combined Exploitation of Offshore Wind and Wave Energy in the Italian Seas: A Spatial Planning Approach
    Azzellino, Arianna
    Lanfredi, Caterina
    Riefolo, Luigia
    De Santis, Valentina
    Contestabile, Pasquale
    Vicinanza, Diego
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 7 (APR):
  • [26] SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF LABOUR MOBILITY IN CANARY ISLANDS
    Barrios Gonzalez, Ma Candelaria
    Hernandez Lopez, Montserrat
    BOLETIN DE LA ASOCIACION DE GEOGRAFOS ESPANOLES, 2014, (66): : 7 - 24
  • [27] Maritime spatial planning and marine renewable energy
    O'Hagan, Anne Marie
    PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2016, 17 (01) : 148 - 151
  • [28] Comparative Analysis of Global Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Characteristics and Potentials
    Tumse, Sergen
    Bilgili, Mehmet
    Yildirim, Alper
    Sahin, Besir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [29] Maritime Spatial Planning supported by systematic site selection: Applying Marxan for offshore wind power in the western Baltic Sea
    Goke, Cordula
    Dahl, Karsten
    Mohn, Christian
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [30] Spatial planning offshore wind energy farms in California for mediating fisheries and wildlife conservation impacts
    White, Crow
    Wang, Yi-Hi
    Walter, Ryan K.
    Ruttenberg, Benjamin I.
    Han, Danny
    Newman, Eli
    Deyle, Ethan R.
    Gopal, Sucharita
    Kaufman, Les
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 51