Proportion of right ventricular failure and echocardiographic predictors in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Benedetto, Maria [1 ]
Piccone, Giulia [1 ]
Nardozi, Ludovica [1 ]
Baca, Georgiana Luisa [2 ]
Baiocchi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCSS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Cardiothorac & Vasc Dept, Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
[2] NIA, Lab Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Right ventricular failure; Continuous-flow LVAD; Echocardiographic assessment; Advanced heart failure; RIGHT HEART-FAILURE; SPECKLE-TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; DIAMETER RATIO; STATEMENT; STRAIN; RISK; IMPLANTATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s12055-022-01447-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Right ventricular failure (RVF) in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricle assist device (CF-LVAD) is associated with higher incidence of mortality. This systematic review aims to assess the overall proportion of RVF and the pre-operative echocardiographic parameters which are best correlating to RVF.Methods A systematic research was conducted between 2008 and 2019 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, UPTODATE, OVID, COCHRANE LIBRARY, and Google Scholar electronic databases by performing a PRISMA flowchart. All observational studies regarding echocardiographic predictors of RVF in patients undergoing CF-LVAD implantation were included.Results A total number of 19 observational human studies published between 2008 and 2019 were included. We identified 524 RVF patients out of a pooled final population of 1741 patients. The RVF overall proportion was 28.25% with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.34. The highest variability of perioperative echocardiographic parameters between the RVF and no right ventricular failure (NO-RVF) groups has been found with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS). Their standardized mean deviation (SMD) was - 0.33 (95% CI - 0.54 to - 0.11; p value 0.003), - 0.34 (95% CI - 0.53 to - 0.15; p value 0.0001), and 0.52 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.25; p value 0.0001), respectively.Conclusions The echocardiographic predictors of RVF after CF-LVAD placement are still uncertain. However, there seems to be a trend of statistical correlation between TAPSE, FAC, and RVGLS with RVF event after CF-LVAD placement.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 181
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Echocardiographic Findings in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump Thrombosis
    Ortega-Legaspi, Juan M.
    Airhart, Sophia
    Hoang Nguyen
    Masri, S. Carolina
    Kirkpatrick, James
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2016, 22 (08) : S117 - S117
  • [22] Contemporary outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device for severe right heart failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device insertion
    Yoshioka, Daisuke
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Garan, Reshad A.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    Han, Jiho
    Kurlansky, Paul
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Takeda, Koji
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 24 (06) : 828 - 834
  • [23] Clinical Outcomes After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device A Systematic Review
    McIlvennan, Colleen K.
    Magid, Kate H.
    Ambardekar, Amrut V.
    Thompson, Jocelyn S.
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    Allen, Larry A.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2014, 7 (06) : 1003 - U237
  • [24] Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left-Ventricular Assist Devices: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Draper, Karen
    Huang, Robert J.
    Gerson, Lauren B.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S558 - S558
  • [25] Minimally invasive versus conventional continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation for heart failure: a meta-analysis
    Bufan Zhang
    Shaohua Guo
    Zean Fu
    Zhigang Liu
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2022, 27 : 1053 - 1061
  • [26] Hemodynamic Predictors of Right Heart Failure Requiring Right Ventricular Assist Devices After Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Placement
    Lee, Dae Hyun
    Stachura, Zachary
    Kulkarni, Deepika
    Feliberti, Jason P.
    Restrepo-Jaramillo, Ricardo
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [27] Minimally invasive versus conventional continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation for heart failure: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Bufan
    Guo, Shaohua
    Fu, Zean
    Liu, Zhigang
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2022, 27 (04) : 1053 - 1061
  • [28] Effects of the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device on right ventricular function
    Lee, Sangjin
    Kamdar, Forum
    Madlon-Kay, Richard
    Boyle, Andrew
    Colvin-Adams, Monica
    Pritzker, Marc
    John, Ranjit
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (02): : 209 - 215
  • [29] Right ventricular reserve and outcome after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Deswarte, Guillaume
    Kirsch, Matthias
    Lesault, Pierre-Francois
    Trochu, Jean-Noel
    Damy, Thibaud
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (10): : 1196 - 1198
  • [30] Association of Atrial Fibrillation and Postoperative Right Ventricular Failure after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kittipibul, Veraprapas
    Blumer, Vanessa
    Fudim, Marat
    Flowers, Robert
    Hernandez, Gabriel A.
    Chaparro, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2019, 25 (08) : S175 - S175