Predicting the sheet resistance of laser-induced graphitic carbon using machine learning

被引:3
|
作者
Le, Hung [1 ]
Minhas-Khan, Aamir [2 ]
Nambi, Suresh [2 ]
Grau, Gerd [2 ]
Shen, Wen [1 ]
Wu, Dazhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] York Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
来源
FLEXIBLE AND PRINTED ELECTRONICS | 2023年 / 8卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
laser-induced graphitic carbon; sheet resistance; machine learning; predictive modeling; NEURAL-NETWORK; GRAPHENE; FABRICATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1088/2058-8585/acedbf
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
While laser-induced graphitic carbon (LIGC) has been used to fabricate cost-effective conductive carbon on flexible substrates for applications such as sensors and energy storage devices, predicting the resistance of the component fabricated via LIGC remains challenging. In this study, a two-step machine learning-based modeling framework is developed to predict the sheet resistance of the materials fabricated using LIGC. The two-step modeling framework consists of classification and regression. First, random forest (RF) is used to classify successful and failed trials. Second, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), RF, support vector machine with radial basis function, multivariate adaptive spline regression, and multilayer perceptron are used to predict the sheet resistance in each successful trial. In addition, an analysis of the change in sheet resistance with respect to laser energy per unit area is conducted to remove data points with high sheet resistance. XGBoost is also used to determine the importance of each process parameter. We demonstrate the modeling framework on datasets collected from experiments where LIGC lines (1D) and LIGC squares (2D) are engraved. For the 1D dataset, the RF classification model achieves a 95% accuracy. For both 1D and 2D datasets, a comparative study shows that XGBoost outperforms other algorithms. XGBoost predicts the sheet resistance of the LIGC lines and squares with a MAPE of 7.08% and 8.75%, respectively. XGBoost also identifies laser resolution as the most significant parameter. Moreover, experimental results show that models built on the dataset merging the 1D and 2D datasets result in lower prediction accuracy than those built on the 1D and 2D datasets separately. The modeling framework allows one to determine the sheet resistance of LIGC with varying laser processing conditions without conducting expensive and time-consuming experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiplexing steganography based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with machine learning
    Yin, Pengkun
    Yang, Enlai
    Chen, Youyuan
    Peng, Zhengying
    Li, Dan
    Duan, Yixiang
    Lin, Qingyu
    CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 57 (59) : 7312 - 7315
  • [42] Laser-induced bending of aluminum plated steel sheet
    Ji, Zhong
    Liu, Qingbin
    Wu, Shichun
    Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 1996, 14 (04): : 645 - 646
  • [43] Pulsed laser-induced forming of thin sheet metal
    Petrov, A. A.
    Kochetov, A. D.
    FUNDAMENTALS OF LASER-ASSISTED MICRO- AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES 2010, 2011, 7996
  • [44] Predicting In Vitro Neurotoxicity Induced by Nanoparticles Using Machine Learning
    Furxhi, Irini
    Murphy, Finbarr
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (15) : 1 - 21
  • [45] Laser-induced vaporization of a stretching sheet of liquid tin
    Liu, Bo
    Meijer, Randy A.
    Hernandez-Rueda, Javier
    Kurilovich, Dmitry
    Mazzotta, Zeudi
    Witte, Stefan
    Versolato, Oscar O.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2021, 129 (05)
  • [46] Surface hardness determination of laser cladding using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and machine learning (PLSR, CNN, ResNet, and DRSN)
    Yang, Jiacheng
    Kong, Linghua
    Ye, Hongji
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2024, 63 (10) : 2509 - 2517
  • [47] Predicting future hospital antimicrobial resistance prevalence using machine learning
    Vihta, Karina-Doris
    Pritchard, Emma
    Pouwels, Koen B.
    Hopkins, Susan
    Guy, Rebecca L.
    Henderson, Katherine
    Chudasama, Dimple
    Hope, Russell
    Muller-Pebody, Berit
    Walker, Ann Sarah
    Clifton, David
    Eyre, David W.
    COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [48] Predicting for disease resistance in aquaculture species using machine learning models
    Palaiokostas, Christos
    AQUACULTURE REPORTS, 2021, 20
  • [49] Predicting Relative Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance using Machine Learning Methods
    Wu, Ying
    Jiang, Peng
    Goh, Shin Giek
    Yu, Kaifeng
    Chen, Yihan
    He, Yiliang
    Gin, Karina Y. H.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (10): : 1266 - 1271
  • [50] Predicting Sheet and Rill Erosion of Shihmen Reservoir Watershed in Taiwan Using Machine Learning
    Kieu Anh Nguyen
    Chen, Walter
    Lin, Bor-Shiun
    Seeboonruang, Uma
    Thomas, Kent
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13)