Predicting the sheet resistance of laser-induced graphitic carbon using machine learning

被引:3
|
作者
Le, Hung [1 ]
Minhas-Khan, Aamir [2 ]
Nambi, Suresh [2 ]
Grau, Gerd [2 ]
Shen, Wen [1 ]
Wu, Dazhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] York Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
来源
FLEXIBLE AND PRINTED ELECTRONICS | 2023年 / 8卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
laser-induced graphitic carbon; sheet resistance; machine learning; predictive modeling; NEURAL-NETWORK; GRAPHENE; FABRICATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1088/2058-8585/acedbf
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
While laser-induced graphitic carbon (LIGC) has been used to fabricate cost-effective conductive carbon on flexible substrates for applications such as sensors and energy storage devices, predicting the resistance of the component fabricated via LIGC remains challenging. In this study, a two-step machine learning-based modeling framework is developed to predict the sheet resistance of the materials fabricated using LIGC. The two-step modeling framework consists of classification and regression. First, random forest (RF) is used to classify successful and failed trials. Second, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), RF, support vector machine with radial basis function, multivariate adaptive spline regression, and multilayer perceptron are used to predict the sheet resistance in each successful trial. In addition, an analysis of the change in sheet resistance with respect to laser energy per unit area is conducted to remove data points with high sheet resistance. XGBoost is also used to determine the importance of each process parameter. We demonstrate the modeling framework on datasets collected from experiments where LIGC lines (1D) and LIGC squares (2D) are engraved. For the 1D dataset, the RF classification model achieves a 95% accuracy. For both 1D and 2D datasets, a comparative study shows that XGBoost outperforms other algorithms. XGBoost predicts the sheet resistance of the LIGC lines and squares with a MAPE of 7.08% and 8.75%, respectively. XGBoost also identifies laser resolution as the most significant parameter. Moreover, experimental results show that models built on the dataset merging the 1D and 2D datasets result in lower prediction accuracy than those built on the 1D and 2D datasets separately. The modeling framework allows one to determine the sheet resistance of LIGC with varying laser processing conditions without conducting expensive and time-consuming experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retrieving a Complex Molecular Structure from Laser-Induced Electron Diffraction Using Machine Learning
    Liu, Xinyao
    Amini, Kasra
    Sanchez, Aurelien
    Belsa, Blanca
    Steinle, Tobias
    Chirvi, Katharina
    Biegert, Jens
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ATTOSECOND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ATTO 2023, 2024, 300 : 69 - 73
  • [22] Quantitative determination of phosphorus in seafood using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with machine learning
    Tian, Ye
    Chen, Qian
    Lin, Yuqing
    Lu, Yuan
    Li, Ying
    Lin, Hong
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2021, 175
  • [23] DETECTION OF CARBON USING AMPLIFIED LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE
    BERGSTROM, H
    HALLSTADIUS, H
    LUNDBERG, H
    PERSSON, A
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1989, 155 (01) : 27 - 31
  • [24] Formation of carbon nanotubes: In situ optical analysis using laser-induced incandescence and laser-induced fluorescence
    Cau, M.
    Dorval, N.
    Attal-Tretout, B.
    Cochon, J. -L.
    Foutel-Richard, A.
    Loiseau, A.
    Krueger, V.
    Tsurikov, M.
    Scott, C. D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2010, 81 (16):
  • [25] Machine learning for laser-induced electron diffraction imaging of molecular structures
    Xinyao Liu
    Kasra Amini
    Aurelien Sanchez
    Blanca Belsa
    Tobias Steinle
    Jens Biegert
    Communications Chemistry, 4
  • [26] New Trend: Application of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy with Machine Learning
    Wang, Zhe
    CHEMOSENSORS, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [27] Machine learning for laser-induced electron diffraction imaging of molecular structures
    Liu, Xinyao
    Amini, Kasra
    Sanchez, Aurelien
    Belsa, Blanca
    Steinle, Tobias
    Biegert, Jens
    COMMUNICATIONS CHEMISTRY, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [28] Predicting Laser-Induced Colors of Random Plasmonic Metasurfaces and Optimizing Image Multiplexing Using Deep Learning
    Ma, Hongfeng
    Dalloz, Nicolas
    Habrard, Amaury
    Sebban, Marc
    Sterl, Florian
    Giessen, Harald
    Hebert, Mathieu
    Destouches, Nathalie
    ACS NANO, 2022, 16 (06) : 9410 - 9419
  • [29] Simultaneous measurement of carbon emission and gas temperature via laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with machine learning
    Kim, Dongju
    Bong, Cheolwoo
    Im, Seong-Kyun Im
    Bak, Moon Soo
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2023, 31 (04): : 7032 - 7046
  • [30] Room Temperature Sensing of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Hybrid Layered SnO Mesoflowers and Laser-Induced Graphitic Carbon Devices
    Murray, Richard
    Muriqi, Arbresha
    Larrigy, Cathal
    Russo, Alida
    Mengistu, Mintesinot Tamiru
    Iacopino, Daniela
    Fitzpatrick, Colin
    Nolan, Michael
    Quinn, Aidan J.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (41): : 15063 - 15076