Comparison of prognosis between coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Xie, Qingya [1 ]
Zhou, Lingling [2 ]
Li, Ying [3 ]
Zhang, Ruizhe [1 ]
Wei, Han [4 ]
Ma, Gaoxiang [3 ]
Tang, Yuping [2 ]
Xiao, Pingxi [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sir Run Run Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Childrens Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] China Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Tradit Chinese Pharm, State Key Lab Nat Med, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp Grp, Dept Cardiol, Suqian Hosp, Suqian, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Forth Affiliated Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
coronary computed tomography angiography; invasive coronary angiography; stable coronary artery disease; meta-analysis; review; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; 64-SLICE;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1010536
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe impact of using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as an initial examination on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with stable coronary artery disease and the occurrence of major operation-related complications is uncertain. ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the effects of ICA vs. CCTA on MACEs, all-cause death, and major operation-related complications. MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed and Embase) was conducted for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing MACEs between ICA and CCTA from January 2012 to May 2022. The primary outcome measure was analyzed using a random-effects model as a pooled odds ratio (OR). The main observations were MACEs, all-cause death, and major operation-related complications. ResultsA total of six studies, comprising 26,548 patients, met the inclusion criteria (ICA n = 8,472; CCTA n = 18,076). There were statistically significant differences between ICA and CCTA for MACE [OR 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.77; p = 0.02], all-cause death (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.38-1.78; p < 0.00001), and major operation-related complications (OR 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23-3.61; p = 0.007) among patients with stable coronary artery disease. Subgroup analysis demonstrated statistically significant results in the impact of ICA or CCTA on MACEs according to the length of follow-up. Compared to CCTA, ICA was related to a higher incidence of MACEs in the subgroup with a short follow-up (<= 3 years) (OR 1.74; 95% CI, 1.54-1.96; p < 0.00001). ConclusionsAmong patients with stable coronary artery disease, an initial examination with ICA was significantly associated with the risk of MACEs, all-cause death, and major procedure-related complications compared to CCTA in this meta-analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computed Tomography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Simpson, Timothy F.
    Osman, Mohammed
    German, David M.
    Fuss, Cristina S.
    Ferencik, Maros
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 15 (12) : 2147 - 2149
  • [22] Current applications and limitations of coronary computed tomography angiography in stable coronary artery disease
    Schuijf, Joanne D.
    Achenbach, Stephan
    de Feyter, Pim J.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    [J]. HEART, 2011, 97 (04) : 330 - 337
  • [23] Functional Testing or Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease
    Jorgensen, Mads E.
    Andersson, Charlotte
    Norgaard, Bjarne L.
    Abdulla, Jawdat
    Shreibati, Jacqueline B.
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Gislason, Gunnar H.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (14) : 1761 - 1770
  • [24] Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Safely Defers Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease
    Rabbat, Mark
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    Bax, Jeroen
    Kauh, Brian
    Verma, Rina
    Doukas, Demetrios
    Allen, Sorcha
    Pontone, Gianluca
    Wilber, David
    Mathew, Verghese
    Rogers, Campbell
    Lopez, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [25] Can Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Replace Invasive Angiography? Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Cannot Replace Invasive Angiography
    Stefanini, Giulio G.
    Windecker, Stephan
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2015, 131 (04) : 418 - 426
  • [26] Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis
    Sun, Zhonghua
    Jiang, Wen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [27] Dual-source computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Salavati, Ali
    Radmanesh, Farid
    Heidari, Kazem
    Dwamena, Ben A.
    Kelly, Aine M.
    Cronin, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 6 (02) : 78 - 90
  • [28] 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mowatt, G.
    Cook, J. A.
    Hillis, G. S.
    Walker, S.
    Fraser, C.
    Jia, X.
    Waugh, N.
    [J]. HEART, 2008, 94 (11) : 1386 - 1393
  • [29] 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdulla, Jawdat
    Abildstrom, Steen Z.
    Gotzsche, Ole
    Christensen, Erik
    Kober, Lars
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (24) : 3042 - 3050
  • [30] Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography angiography and coronary angiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with angina: A systematic review
    Powell, H.
    Cosson, P.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2013, 19 (02) : 168 - 175