Life-Cycle Analysis of Crystalline-Si "Direct Wafer" and Tandem Perovskite PV Modules and Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Leccisi, Enrica [1 ]
Lorenz, Adam [2 ]
Fthenakis, Vasilis [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Ctr Life Cycle Anal, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] CubicPV Inc, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
来源
IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Cumulative energy demand (CED); energy pay back time (EPBT); global warming potential (GWP); kerfless; life cycle analysis (LCA); perovskite; tandem PV;
D O I
10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3220958
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This article summarizes a life cycle analysis comparing "Direct Wafer " (DW) technology produced by CubicPV to conventional Czochralski wafers as well as the use of both wafer types in tandem with perovskite photovoltaic (PV). It shows that significant reduction in energy and environmental impact is achievable through the use of kerfless wafers in PV module manufacturing. Direct wafer PV production avoids ingot production, associated electricity consumption, and kerf loss and enables reduced wafer thickness. The impact is quantified in terms of life-cycle cumulative energy demand (CED), global warming potential (GWP), and energy pay back time. For single-junction PV, using US-made DW PV cells is projected to result in 47% less CED and 68% less GWP than that required for conventional Cz single-crystalline cells production in China. With direct wafer-perovskite tandem modules, a 24% CED reduction for installed system is projected for US production versus Chinese production with conventional wafering.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 21
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY-SYSTEMS
    SORENSEN, B
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1994, 5 (5-8) : 1270 - 1277
  • [22] Comparison and analysis of performance and degradation differences of crystalline-Si photovoltaic modules after 15-years of field operation
    Carvalho de Oliveira, Michele Candida
    Cassini, Denio Alves
    Alves Cardoso Diniz, Antonia Sonia
    Soares, Laura Guimaraes
    Viana, Marcelo Machado
    Kazmerski, Lawrence Lee
    Cunha Lins, Vanessa de Freitas
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 191 : 235 - 250
  • [23] Comparative life-cycle energy payback analysis of multi-junction a-SiGe and nanocrystalline/a-Si modules
    Kim, H. C.
    Fthenakis, V. M.
    PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2011, 19 (02): : 228 - 239
  • [24] Life cycle energy demand and carbon emissions of scalable single-junction and tandem perovskite PV
    Leccisi, Enrica
    Fthenakis, Vasilis
    PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2021, 29 (10): : 1078 - 1092
  • [25] LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF SILICON-BASED PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS
    HUBER, W
    KOLB, G
    SOLAR ENERGY, 1995, 54 (03) : 153 - 163
  • [26] Comparative analysis of life-cycle costing for rehabilitating infrastructure systems
    Concordia Univ., Dept. of Building Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Montreal, QC, Canada
    J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 2009, 5 (320-326):
  • [27] Life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure systems: Life-Cycle Cost vs. safety level vs. service life
    Furuta, H
    Kameda, T
    Fukuda, Y
    Frangopol, DM
    LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF DETERIORATING STRUCTURES: ASSESSMENT, DESIGN, AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, : 19 - 25
  • [28] Life-cycle assessment of China's multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules considering international trade
    Yang, Dong
    Liu, Jingru
    Yang, Jianxin
    Ding, Ning
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 : 35 - 45
  • [29] Life-cycle environmental impacts of single-junction and tandem perovskite PVs: a critical review and future perspectives
    Leccisi, Enrica
    Fthenakis, Vasilis
    PROGRESS IN ENERGY, 2020, 2 (03):
  • [30] Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Considerations for Life-Cycle Analysis of Pavement Systems
    Uddin, Waheed
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE ASPHALT PAVEMENTS, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 50 - 55