PUBLIC MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN THE DIGITAL RISK SOCIETY: A Critical Analysis of the Public Debate on Implementation of the Danish NemID

被引:13
|
作者
Ngwenyama, Ojelanki [1 ,2 ]
Henriksen, Helle Zinner [3 ]
Hardt, Daniel [4 ]
机构
[1] Ryerson Univ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Digitalizat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Management Soc & Commun, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Critical social theory; digital risk society; critical is research; national digital infrastructure; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; MEDIA LOGIC; DATA BREACH; INFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNMENT; INNOVATION; SURVEILLANCE; DISCOURSE;
D O I
10.1080/0960085X.2021.1907234
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The rise of the digital society is accompanied by incalculable social risks, but very little IS research has examined the implications of the new digital society. Drawing on concepts from Beck's critical theory of the risk society and critical discourse analysis, this study examines the public discourse on risk events during the launch of NemID, a personal digital identifier for Danish citizens. This research illustrates our difficulties and challenges in managing some of the fundamental social risks from societal digitalisation. Limited institutional capabilities for digital technologies force public officials to depend on private companies motived by profit instead of the public interest. Beliefs in digital technology as the primary determinant of social and economic progress also present many public management dilemmas. When digital risk events occur and citizens' fears are stoked by news media and public discourse, public officials seem to have no other strategy for managing the escalating fears than systematically distorted communication. The continued rise of the digital risk society demands that IS research respond to the challenge of generating knowledge for its public management.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 126
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CHALLENGES TO PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
    Pedraja-Rejas, Liliana
    INTERCIENCIA, 2017, 42 (03) : 146 - 146
  • [2] Debate: Fraud risk management in the public sector
    Jackson, Peter M.
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (01) : 6 - 8
  • [3] Inequality, digital divide and debate on public policies: paths of knowledge in the digital society
    Grech-Santi, Clara
    PROSPECTIVA, 2024, (38):
  • [4] Risk Analysis and Risk Management in the Public Sector and in Public Auditing
    Domokos, Laszlo
    Nyeki, Melinda
    Jakovac, Katalin
    Nemeth, Erzsebet
    Hatvani, Csaba
    PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY, 2015, 60 (01): : 7 - 28
  • [5] Implementation of risk management in a public health laboratory
    Kira, Carmen Silvia
    Fonseca, Larissa Germano
    VIGILANCIA SANITARIA EM DEBATE-SOCIEDADE CIENCIA & TECNOLOGIA, 2020, 8 (01): : 31 - 39
  • [6] Governance and risk management: challenges and public productivity
    Halachmi, Arie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2005, 18 (04) : 300 - +
  • [7] The role of philosophy in public debate - A content analysis of the debate on the "sorting society" in Norway in 2017
    Hofmann, Bjorn
    Carson, Siri Granum
    ETIKK I PRAKSIS, 2018, 12 (02): : 87 - 103
  • [8] THE ANALYSIS OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION IN PUBLIC SECTOR
    Malos, Raul Cezar
    Andres, Solomia
    Onetiu, Anda Nicoleta
    ECONOMIC WORLD DESTINY: CRISIS AND GLOBALIZATION?, SECTION II: CHANGE MANAGEMENT: NEW COORDINATES, 2010, : 191 - 196
  • [9] Risk management challenges of shared public services: a comparative analysis of Scotland and Finland
    Valkama, Pekka
    Asenova, Darinka
    Bailey, Stephen J.
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 36 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [10] Digital transformation of project implementation monitoring in the regional public management
    Tsurkan, M., V
    Mironova, S. M.
    Pilipchuk, N., V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE MODERN MANAGEMENT TRENDS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH (MTDE 2019), 2019, 81 : 80 - 85