Peritumoral Radiomics Strategy Based on Ensemble Learning for the Prediction of Gleason Grade Group of Prostate Cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Qiu, Yang [1 ]
Liu, Yun-Fan [1 ]
Shu, Xin [1 ]
Qiao, Xiao-Feng [1 ]
Ai, Guang-Yong [1 ]
He, Xiao-Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Gleason grade group; Machine learning; MRI; Peritumoral radiomics; Prostate cancer; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2023.06.011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To develop and evaluate a peritumoral radiomic-based machine learning model to differentiate low-Gleason grade group (L-GGG) and high-GGG (H-GGG) prostate lesions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 175 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) confirmed by puncture biopsy were recruited and included 59 patients with L-GGG and 116 patients with H-GGG. The original PCa regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on T2-weighted (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and then centra-tumoral and peritumoral ROIs were defined. Features were meticulously extracted from each ROI to establish radiomics models, employing distinct sequence datasets. Peritumoral radiomics models were specifically developed for both the peripheral zone (PZ) and transitional zone (TZ), utilizing dedicated PZ and TZ datasets, respectively. The performances of the models were evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall curve. Results The classification model with combined peritumoral features based on T2 + DWI + ADC sequence dataset demonstrated superior performance compared to the original tumor and centra-tumoral classification models. It achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.850 [95% confidence interval, 0.849, 0.860] and an average accuracy of 0.950. The combined peritumoral model out-performed the regional peritumoral models with AUC of 0.85 versus 0.75 for PZ lesions and 0.88 versus 0.69 for TZ lesions, respectively. The peritumoral classification models exhibit greater efficacy in predicting PZ lesions as opposed to TZ lesions. Conclusion: The peritumoral radiomics features showed excellent performance in predicting GGG in PCa patients and might be a valuable addition to the non-invasive assessment of PCa aggressiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for Ki67 Expression and Gleason Grade Group Prediction in Prostate Cancer
    Qiao, Xiaofeng
    Gu, Xiling
    Liu, Yunfan
    Shu, Xin
    Ai, Guangyong
    Qian, Shuang
    Liu, Li
    He, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Jingjing
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [2] Prediction of Gleason Grade Group of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI using Deep Machine Learning Models
    Zong, Weiwei
    Lee, Joon
    Pantelic, Milan
    Wen, Ning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (02): : E9 - E10
  • [3] Prediction of Gleason Grade Group of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI Using Deep Learning, Transfer Learning, Representation Learning and Prototype Network
    Zong, W.
    Pantelic, M.
    Mohamed, E.
    Wen, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E360 - E360
  • [4] Discriminatory Gleason grade group signatures of prostate cancer: An application of machine learning methods
    Mokoatle, Mpho
    Mapiye, Darlington
    Marivate, Vukosi
    Hayes, Vanessa M.
    Bornman, Riana
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [5] A radiomics based method for prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using enlarged region of interest
    Zhuang, Haoming
    Chatterjee, Aritrick
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Qi, Shouliang
    Qian, Wei
    He, Dianning
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Romero, Tahmineh
    Alshalalfa, Mohammed
    Liu, Yang
    Tran, Phuoc T.
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Ye, Huihui
    Sajed, Dipti
    Rettig, Matthew B.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Garraway, Isla P.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Freedland, Steven J.
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Ziwen
    Deek, Matthew
    Livingstone, Julie
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Den, Robert B.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Lotan, Tamara L.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Grogan, Tristan
    Davicioni, Elai
    Elashoff, David
    Boutros, Paul C.
    Weidhaas, Joanne B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) : 327 - 332
  • [7] A radiomics based method for prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using enlarged region of interest
    Haoming Zhuang
    Aritrick Chatterjee
    Xiaobing Fan
    Shouliang Qi
    Wei Qian
    Dianning He
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [8] Pelvic nodal radiotherapy in Gleason grade group 5 prostate cancer
    Cook, Kiri
    Kishan, Amar U.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (05) : 2326 - 2328
  • [9] Establishing a model predicting Gleason grade group upgrading in prostate cancer
    Chen, Jian
    Chen, Qiming
    Wang, Ze
    Yan, Xuzhi
    Wang, Yapeng
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Jun
    Xu, Jing
    Ma, Qiang
    Zhong, Peng
    Zhang, Dianzheng
    Liu, Qiuli
    Lan, Weihua
    Jiang, Jun
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [10] Editorial for "Multiparametric MRI-Based Peritumoral Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of the Presence of Extracapsular Extension With Prostate Cancer"
    Shiradkar, Rakesh
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (04) : 1231 - 1232