Peritumoral Radiomics Strategy Based on Ensemble Learning for the Prediction of Gleason Grade Group of Prostate Cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Qiu, Yang [1 ]
Liu, Yun-Fan [1 ]
Shu, Xin [1 ]
Qiao, Xiao-Feng [1 ]
Ai, Guang-Yong [1 ]
He, Xiao-Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Gleason grade group; Machine learning; MRI; Peritumoral radiomics; Prostate cancer; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2023.06.011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To develop and evaluate a peritumoral radiomic-based machine learning model to differentiate low-Gleason grade group (L-GGG) and high-GGG (H-GGG) prostate lesions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 175 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) confirmed by puncture biopsy were recruited and included 59 patients with L-GGG and 116 patients with H-GGG. The original PCa regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on T2-weighted (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and then centra-tumoral and peritumoral ROIs were defined. Features were meticulously extracted from each ROI to establish radiomics models, employing distinct sequence datasets. Peritumoral radiomics models were specifically developed for both the peripheral zone (PZ) and transitional zone (TZ), utilizing dedicated PZ and TZ datasets, respectively. The performances of the models were evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall curve. Results The classification model with combined peritumoral features based on T2 + DWI + ADC sequence dataset demonstrated superior performance compared to the original tumor and centra-tumoral classification models. It achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.850 [95% confidence interval, 0.849, 0.860] and an average accuracy of 0.950. The combined peritumoral model out-performed the regional peritumoral models with AUC of 0.85 versus 0.75 for PZ lesions and 0.88 versus 0.69 for TZ lesions, respectively. The peritumoral classification models exhibit greater efficacy in predicting PZ lesions as opposed to TZ lesions. Conclusion: The peritumoral radiomics features showed excellent performance in predicting GGG in PCa patients and might be a valuable addition to the non-invasive assessment of PCa aggressiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Railway accident prediction strategy based on ensemble learning
    Meng, Haining
    Tong, Xinyu
    Zheng, Yi
    Xie, Guo
    Ji, Wenjiang
    Hei, Xinhong
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 176
  • [32] A pilot study to assess the relationship between ADC values and Gleason scores in prostate cancer: implications for a Gleason grade prediction
    Waldron, L.
    Lavoipierre, A.
    Frydenberg, M.
    Federman, D.
    Pedersen, J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 : 63 - 64
  • [33] Predicting the Grade of Prostate Cancer Based on a Biparametric MRI Radiomics Signature
    Zhang, Li
    Zhe, Xia
    Tang, Min
    Zhang, Jing
    Ren, Jialiang
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Li, Longchao
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 2021
  • [34] Deep Learning Features Can Improve Radiomics-Based Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Prediction
    Rodrigues, Nuno M.
    de Almeida, Jose Guilherme
    Rodrigues, Ana
    Vanneschi, Leonardo
    Matos, Celso
    Lisitskaya, Maria V.
    Uysal, Aycan
    Silva, Sara
    Papanikolaou, Nickolas
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2024, 8
  • [35] Prediction of Prostate Cancer using Ensemble of Machine Learning Techniques
    Oyewo, O. A.
    Boyinbode, O. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (03) : 149 - 154
  • [36] Consensus guidelines for reporting prostate cancer Gleason Grade
    Zietman, Anthony
    Smith, Joseph
    Klein, Eric
    Droller, Michael
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Catto, James
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (06) : 849 - 849
  • [37] Prediction of bone metastasis of prostate cancer based on intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics of MRI T2WI combined with ADC images
    Lin, Shiqian
    He, Pingping
    You, Ruixiong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [38] Gleason Grade-based Automatic Classification of Prostate Cancer Pathological Images
    Almuntashri, Ali
    Agaian, Sos
    Thompson, Ian
    Rabah, Danny
    Al-Abdin, Osman Zin
    Nicolas, Marlo
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2011, : 2696 - 2701
  • [39] Consensus guidelines for reporting prostate cancer Gleason Grade
    Egevad, Lars
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Srigley, John R.
    Delahunt, Brett
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (03) : E1 - E2
  • [40] Consensus Guidelines for Reporting Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade
    Klein, Eric
    Zietman, Anthony
    Smith, Joseph
    Droller, Michael
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Catto, James
    UROLOGY, 2016, 93 : 1 - 1