A radiomics based method for prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using enlarged region of interest

被引:2
|
作者
Zhuang, Haoming [1 ]
Chatterjee, Aritrick [2 ]
Fan, Xiaobing [2 ]
Qi, Shouliang [1 ]
Qian, Wei [1 ]
He, Dianning [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Med & Biol Informat Engn, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiparametric MRI; Gleason score; Texture feature; Machine learning; Prostate cancer; BIOPSY; MRI; ACCURACY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01167-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men worldwide, and its timely diagnosis and treatment are becoming increasingly important. MRI is in increasing use to diagnose cancer and to distinguish between non-clinically significant and clinically significant PCa, leading to more precise diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this study is to present a radiomics-based method for determining the Gleason score (GS) for PCa using tumour heterogeneity on multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI).MethodsTwenty-six patients with biopsy-proven PCa were included in this study. The quantitative T2 values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal enhancement rates (alpha) were calculated using multi-echo T2 images, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), for the annotated region of interests (ROI). After texture feature analysis, ROI range expansion and feature filtering was performed. Then obtained data were put into support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and other classifiers for binary classification.ResultsThe highest classification accuracy was 73.96% for distinguishing between clinically significant (Gleason 3 + 4 and above) and non-significant cancers (Gleason 3 + 3) and 83.72% for distinguishing between Gleason 3 + 4 from Gleason 4 + 3 and above, which was achieved using initial ROIs drawn by the radiologists. The accuracy improved when using expanded ROIs to 80.67% using SVM and 88.42% using Bayesian classification for distinguishing between clinically significant and non-significant cancers and Gleason 3 + 4 from Gleason 4 + 3 and above, respectively.ConclusionsOur results indicate the research significance and value of this study for determining the GS for prostate cancer using the expansion of the ROI region.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A radiomics based method for prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using enlarged region of interest
    Haoming Zhuang
    Aritrick Chatterjee
    Xiaobing Fan
    Shouliang Qi
    Wei Qian
    Dianning He
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [2] Fitting Methods for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging of Prostate Cancer on Region of Interest Level: Repeatability and Gleason Score Prediction
    Merisaari, Harri
    Movahedi, Parisa
    Perez, Ileana M.
    Toivonen, Jussi
    Pesola, Marko
    Taimen, Pekka
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    Kiviniemi, Aida
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Jambor, Ivan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2017, 77 (03) : 1249 - 1264
  • [3] Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using a MRI-based nomogram.
    Siddiqui, Mohummad Minhaj
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Truong, Hong
    Stamatakis, Lambros
    Walton-Diaz, Annerleim
    George, Arvin
    Rothwax, Jason
    Su, Daniel
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Merino, Maria
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Simon, Richard
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (04)
  • [4] The use of autoantibody signatures for the prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score
    Bradford, TJ
    Wang, XJ
    Wang, R
    Yu, JJ
    Ghosh, D
    Wei, JT
    Chinnaiyan, AM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 274 - 274
  • [5] Peritumoral Radiomics Strategy Based on Ensemble Learning for the Prediction of Gleason Grade Group of Prostate Cancer
    Qiu, Yang
    Liu, Yun-Fan
    Shu, Xin
    Qiao, Xiao-Feng
    Ai, Guang-Yong
    He, Xiao-Jing
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 : S1 - S13
  • [6] Formal methods for prostate cancer Gleason score and treatment prediction using radiomic biomarkers
    Brunese, Luca
    Mercaldo, Francesco
    Reginelli, Alfonso
    Santone, Antonella
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 66 : 165 - 175
  • [7] Radiomics of diffusion-MRI for predicting Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Morelli, L.
    Paganelli, C.
    Marvaso, G.
    Annunziata, S.
    Parrella, G.
    Pepa, M.
    Zaffaroni, M.
    Vicini, M. G.
    Isaksson, L. J.
    Corrao, G.
    Pricolo, P.
    Alessi, S.
    Summers, P. E.
    Cattani, F.
    De Cobelli, O.
    Orecchia, R.
    Petralia, G.
    Jereczek-Fossa, B. A.
    Baroni, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1896 - S1897
  • [8] THE WEIGHTED GLEASON SCORE OF PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS IMPROVES THE PREDICTION OF PATHOLOGIC GLEASON SCORE
    Cho, Eric
    Kaplan, Joshua
    Harbin, Andrew
    Kamenko, Anastasiya
    Ramsey, Frederick
    Mydlo, Jack
    Eun, Daniel
    Reese, Adam
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E244 - E244
  • [9] Prediction of Gleason score in prostate cancer patients based on radiomic features of transrectal ultrasound images
    Cheng, Tao
    Li, Huiming
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1154): : 415 - 421
  • [10] Redefining intermediate risk prostate cancer using Gleason score
    Pollard, M.
    Lavery, H. J.
    Hobbs, A. R.
    Hall, S.
    Levinson, A. W.
    Samadi, D. B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E766 - U626