Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and movement system impairment treatment in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

被引:4
|
作者
Ahmad, Sahar Nazary Soltan [1 ]
Letafatkar, Amir [1 ]
Brewer, Britton W. [2 ]
Sharifnezhad, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Phys Educ & Sport Sci, Dept Biomech & Sport Injuries, Tehran, Iran
[2] Springfield Coll, Dept Psychol, Springfield, MA USA
[3] Sport Sci Res Inst, Dept Sport Biomech & Technol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Chronic low back pain; Cognition; Exercise therapy; Gait kinetics; Kinesiophobia; LUMBAR STABILIZATION; TAMPA SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; KINESIOPHOBIA; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION; INTENSITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06815-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the effects of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) and movement system impairment (MSI)-based treatment on pain intensity, disability, Kinesiophobia, and gait kinetics in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP).MethodsIn a single-blind randomized clinical trial, we randomly assigned 91 patients with CNSLBP into CFT (n = 45) and MSI-based treatment (n = 46) groups. An 8-week training intervention was given to both groups. The researchers measured the primary outcome, which was pain intensity (Numeric rating scale), and the secondary outcomes, including disability (Oswestry disability index), Kinesiophobia (Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale), and vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) parameters at self-selected and faster speed (Force distributor treadmill). We evaluated patients at baseline, at the end of the 8-week intervention (post-treatment), and six months after the first treatment. We used mixed-model ANOVA to evaluate the effects of the interaction between time (baseline vs. post-treatment vs. six-month follow-up) and group (CFT vs. MSI-based treatment) on each measure.ResultsCFT showed superiority over MSI-based treatment in reducing pain intensity (P < 0.001, Effect size (ES) = 2.41), ODI (P < 0.001, ES = 2.15), and Kinesiophobia (P < 0.001, ES = 2.47) at eight weeks. The CFT also produced greater improvement in VGRF parameters, at both self-selected (FPF[P < 0.001, ES = 3], SPF[P < 0.001, ES = 0.5], MSF[P < 0.001, ES = 0.67], WAR[P < 0.001, ES = 1.53], POR[P < 0.001, ES = 0.8]), and faster speed, FPF(P < 0.001, ES = 1.33, MSF(P < 0.001, ES = 0.57), WAR(P < 0.001, ES = 0.67), POR(P < 0.001, ES = 2.91)] than the MSI, except SPF(P < 0.001, ES = 0.0) at eight weeks.ConclusionThis study suggests that the CFT is associated with better results in clinical and cognitive characteristics than the MSI-based treatment for CNSLBP, and the researchers maintained the treatment effects at six-month follow-up. Also, This study achieved better improvements in gait kinetics in CFT. CTF seems to be an appropriate and applicable treatment in clinical setting.Trial registrationThe researchers retrospectively registered the trial 10/11/2022, at https://www.umin.ac.jp/ with identifier number (UMIN000047455).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] "My Back is Fit for Movement": A Qualitative Study Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial for Chronic Low Back Pain
    Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N.
    Wand, Benedict M.
    Leake, Hayley B.
    O'Hagan, Edel T.
    Bagg, Matthew K.
    Bunzli, Samantha
    Traeger, Adrian C.
    Gustin, Sylvia M.
    Moseley, G. Lorimer
    Sharma, Saurab
    Cashin, Aidan G.
    McAuley, James H.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 24 (05): : 824 - 839
  • [42] A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain
    Day, Melissa A.
    Ward, L. Charles
    Ehde, Dawn M.
    Thorn, Beverly E.
    Burns, John
    Barnier, Amanda
    Mattingley, Jason B.
    Jensen, Mark P.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (11) : 2134 - 2148
  • [44] Cognitive functional therapy for chronic disabling low back pain
    Meziat-Filho, Ney
    Fernandez, Jessica
    Castro, Julia
    LANCET, 2023, 401 (10391): : 1828 - 1829
  • [45] A CONTROLLED TREATMENT TRIAL OF CHRONIC BACK PAIN PATIENTS
    DABBS, A
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1986, 39 : A114 - A115
  • [46] A comparison of McKenzie therapy with electrophysical agents for the treatment of work related low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Murtezani, Ardiana
    Govori, Valbona
    Meka, Vjollca Sahatciu
    Ibraimi, Zana
    Rrecaj, Shkurta
    Gashi, Sanie
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 28 (02) : 247 - 253
  • [47] Comparison of kinesio taping and sham taping in patients with chronic low back pain A protocol of randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Dongliang
    Wang, Siqing
    Lu, Kun
    Sun, Yongming
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (47) : E23042
  • [48] Cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain-a randomized controlled trial 3-year follow-up
    Fersum, Kjartan Vibe
    Smith, Anne
    Kvale, Alice
    Skouen, Jan Sture
    O'Sullivan, Peter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 23 (08) : 1416 - 1424
  • [49] The effect of manual therapy and exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: Double blind randomized controlled trial
    Ulger, Ozlem
    Demirel, Aynur
    Oz, Muzeyyen
    Tamer, Seval
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 30 (06) : 1303 - 1309
  • [50] Effects of Baduanjin on patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain A randomized controlled trial
    Yang, Qingtang
    Yu, Shiliang
    Wang, Jianbin
    Zheng, Caiyun
    Liang, Xiaofeng
    Yu, Debiao
    Chen, Xiangmei
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (04)