Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and movement system impairment treatment in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

被引:4
|
作者
Ahmad, Sahar Nazary Soltan [1 ]
Letafatkar, Amir [1 ]
Brewer, Britton W. [2 ]
Sharifnezhad, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Phys Educ & Sport Sci, Dept Biomech & Sport Injuries, Tehran, Iran
[2] Springfield Coll, Dept Psychol, Springfield, MA USA
[3] Sport Sci Res Inst, Dept Sport Biomech & Technol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Chronic low back pain; Cognition; Exercise therapy; Gait kinetics; Kinesiophobia; LUMBAR STABILIZATION; TAMPA SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; KINESIOPHOBIA; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION; INTENSITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06815-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the effects of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) and movement system impairment (MSI)-based treatment on pain intensity, disability, Kinesiophobia, and gait kinetics in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP).MethodsIn a single-blind randomized clinical trial, we randomly assigned 91 patients with CNSLBP into CFT (n = 45) and MSI-based treatment (n = 46) groups. An 8-week training intervention was given to both groups. The researchers measured the primary outcome, which was pain intensity (Numeric rating scale), and the secondary outcomes, including disability (Oswestry disability index), Kinesiophobia (Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale), and vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) parameters at self-selected and faster speed (Force distributor treadmill). We evaluated patients at baseline, at the end of the 8-week intervention (post-treatment), and six months after the first treatment. We used mixed-model ANOVA to evaluate the effects of the interaction between time (baseline vs. post-treatment vs. six-month follow-up) and group (CFT vs. MSI-based treatment) on each measure.ResultsCFT showed superiority over MSI-based treatment in reducing pain intensity (P < 0.001, Effect size (ES) = 2.41), ODI (P < 0.001, ES = 2.15), and Kinesiophobia (P < 0.001, ES = 2.47) at eight weeks. The CFT also produced greater improvement in VGRF parameters, at both self-selected (FPF[P < 0.001, ES = 3], SPF[P < 0.001, ES = 0.5], MSF[P < 0.001, ES = 0.67], WAR[P < 0.001, ES = 1.53], POR[P < 0.001, ES = 0.8]), and faster speed, FPF(P < 0.001, ES = 1.33, MSF(P < 0.001, ES = 0.57), WAR(P < 0.001, ES = 0.67), POR(P < 0.001, ES = 2.91)] than the MSI, except SPF(P < 0.001, ES = 0.0) at eight weeks.ConclusionThis study suggests that the CFT is associated with better results in clinical and cognitive characteristics than the MSI-based treatment for CNSLBP, and the researchers maintained the treatment effects at six-month follow-up. Also, This study achieved better improvements in gait kinetics in CFT. CTF seems to be an appropriate and applicable treatment in clinical setting.Trial registrationThe researchers retrospectively registered the trial 10/11/2022, at https://www.umin.ac.jp/ with identifier number (UMIN000047455).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rumination-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Soleymani, Ali
    Arani, Abbas Masjedi
    Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
    Davazdahemami, Mohammad Hassan
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 9
  • [32] A Cognitive Functional Therapy plus Pathway Versus an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Pathway for Patients With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain (CONFeTTI Trial): Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vaegter, Henrik Bjarke
    Johansen, Jannick Vaaben
    Sopina, Liza
    Smith, Anne
    Kent, Peter
    Fuglsang, Kira Sondberg
    Pedersen, Jesper Fredslund
    Schutze, Rob
    O'Sullivan, Peter
    Handberg, Gitte
    Fatoye, Francis
    Ussing, Kasper
    Stegemejer, Irene
    Thorlund, Jonas Bloch
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 101 (09):
  • [33] Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training on kinetic gait in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial
    Yalfani, Ali
    Asgarpoor, Azadeh
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [34] Comparison of physical therapy versus psychosomatic treatment in chronic low back pain-first results of a randomized controlled trial
    Heindl, B
    Schiltenwolf, M
    Müller, A
    Fromm, B
    Brocai, D
    Eich, WR
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1999, 61 (01): : 102 - 102
  • [35] Comments on "Comparison of Different Treatment Regimens of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Chronic Low-back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial"
    Zhu, Hongyu
    Ye, Ling
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2023, 26 (03) : E236 - E237
  • [36] Effects of Wuqinxi in the Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yao, Chongjie
    Li, Zhenrui
    Zhang, Shuaipan
    Wu, Zhiwei
    Zhu, Qingguang
    Fang, Lei
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 2020
  • [37] Acupuncture for chronic low back pain in older patients: a randomized, controlled trial
    Meng, CF
    Wang, D
    Ngeow, J
    Lao, L
    Peterson, M
    Paget, S
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 (12) : 1508 - 1517
  • [38] Mindful Walking in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rotter, Gabriele
    Ortiz, Miriam
    Binting, Sylvia
    Tomzik, Juliane
    Reese, Frauke
    Roll, Stephanie
    Brinkhaus, Benno
    Teut, Michael
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2022, 28 (06): : 474 - 483
  • [39] Effect of Diode Laser in the Treatment of Patients with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vallone, Francesco
    Benedicenti, Stefano
    Sorrenti, Eugenio
    Schiavetti, Irene
    Angiero, Francesca
    PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2014, 32 (09) : 490 - 494
  • [40] Clinical relevance of combined treatment with exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Blanco-Gimenez, P.
    Vicente-Mampel, J.
    Gargallo, P.
    Baraja-Vegas, L.
    Bautista, I. J.
    Ros-Bernal, F.
    Barrios, C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):