Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix after Breast Cancer: Comparative Study and Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Duenas-Rodriguez, Basilio [1 ]
Navarro-Cecilia, Joaquin [1 ]
Luque-Lopez, Carolina [2 ]
Sanchez-Andujar, Belen [1 ]
Garcelan-Trigo, Juan Arsenio [3 ]
Ramirez-Exposito, Maria Jesus [4 ]
Martinez-Martos, Jose Manuel [4 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Complex Jaen, Dept Surg, Unit Breast Pathol, Jaen 23007, Spain
[2] Hosp Complex Jaen, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Jaen 23007, Spain
[3] Hosp Complex Jaen, Dept Radiol, Jaen 23007, Spain
[4] Univ Jaen, Sch Expt & Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Expt & Clin Physiopathol Res Grp CTS 1039, Jaen 23071, Spain
关键词
skin-sparing mastectomy; immediate reconstruction; breast cancer; biological mesh; BREAST-Q questionnaire; EXPANDER/IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION; TISSUE EXPANDER; IMPLANT; COMPLICATIONS; ALLODERM; SURGERY; STRATTICE(TM); METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE; RETENTION;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15225349
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We evaluate postoperative complications, aesthetic results and satisfaction outcomes in patients with breast cancer after intervening with a skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with an immediate prosthetic reconstruction with or without a biological mesh. Patients with multifocal breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ with an indication for a mastectomy and cT2 tumors with no response to primary systemic treatment were included, whereas patients aged >75 years, with inflammatory carcinoma, and severe circulatory disorders were excluded. Patients in the control group were reconstructed using a prosthesis, whereas the study group included patients reconstructed using a prosthesis and biological acellular porcine dermal mesh (Strattice (TM)). In both groups, the result was assessed using the BREAST-Q instrument. A total of 51 patients (62 intervened breasts) were included in the study group and 38 patients (41 intervened breasts) in the control group. Implant loss and removal occurred in three patients in the study group (5.9%) and nine patients in the control group (24.3%; p = 0.030). Infections appeared in three patients in the study group (4.8%) and three patients in the control group (7.3%; p = 1.00). Skin necrosis appeared in 5 patients in the study group (12.2%) and 11 patients in the control group (21.6%; p = 0.367). Seroma appeared in five patients in the study group (12.2%) and five patients in the control group (8.1%; p = 0.514). The BREAST-Q questionnaire is a comparison between both groups regarding "satisfaction with breasts after surgery" (p = 0.026), "sexual well-being after intervention" (p = 0.010) and "satisfaction with the information received" (p = 0.049). We have noted a statistically significant decrease in implant loss in women receiving an implant with a biological mesh. A higher satisfaction was observed in patients reconstructed using Strattice (TM), with statistically significant differences in three items.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Scheflan, Michael
    Allweis, Tanir M.
    Ben Yehuda, Dafna
    Lotan, Adi Maisel
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (11) : E3265
  • [42] Surgical Outcomes following Breast Reconstruction with Implant and Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM).
    Tummaluru, B.
    Connel, O. R. M.
    Tormey, S.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 : S47 - S47
  • [43] Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Compared with Tissue-expander Breast Reconstruction: Rate of Infection
    Carminati, Marcello
    Sempf, Darja
    Bonfirraro, Pier Paolo
    Devalle, Luca
    Verga, Maurizio
    Righi, Bernardo
    Mevio, Gabriele
    Leone, Francesco
    Fenaroli, Privato
    Robotti, Enrico
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (12)
  • [44] Two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction versus prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a cost analysis
    Innocenti, Alessandro
    Melita, Dario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 45 (04) : 601 - 615
  • [45] Two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction versus prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a cost analysis
    Alessandro Innocenti
    Dario Melita
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2022, 45 : 601 - 615
  • [46] Complication rates of acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction with radiation: A single-institution retrospective comparison study
    Stein, Michael J.
    Chung, Amy
    Arnaout, Angel
    Ghaedi, Bahareh
    Ghumman, Ammara
    Zhang, Tinghua
    Zhang, Jing
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (12): : 2156 - 2163
  • [47] Discussion: Impact and Outcome of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Size for Immediate and Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction
    Gurunluoglu, Raffi
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (01) : 19 - 21
  • [48] Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Efficacy in Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Ouyang, Yiye
    Li, Chengcheng
    Liu, Chunjun
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (02) : 433E - 434E
  • [49] Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Efficacy in Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Sobti, Nikhil
    Ji, Emily
    Brown, Rebecca L.
    Cetrulo, Curtis L.
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Winograd, Jonathan M.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Liao, Eric C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (03) : 541 - 549
  • [50] Immediate Single-stage Endoscopic Latissimus Dorsi Breast and Nipple Reconstruction
    Munoz i Vidal, Joaquim
    Gomes Rodrigues, Tiago A.
    Serra Payro, Josep M.
    Vinals Vinals, Juan Maria
    Dewever, Mike
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2014, 2 (03)