Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix after Breast Cancer: Comparative Study and Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Duenas-Rodriguez, Basilio [1 ]
Navarro-Cecilia, Joaquin [1 ]
Luque-Lopez, Carolina [2 ]
Sanchez-Andujar, Belen [1 ]
Garcelan-Trigo, Juan Arsenio [3 ]
Ramirez-Exposito, Maria Jesus [4 ]
Martinez-Martos, Jose Manuel [4 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Complex Jaen, Dept Surg, Unit Breast Pathol, Jaen 23007, Spain
[2] Hosp Complex Jaen, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Jaen 23007, Spain
[3] Hosp Complex Jaen, Dept Radiol, Jaen 23007, Spain
[4] Univ Jaen, Sch Expt & Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Expt & Clin Physiopathol Res Grp CTS 1039, Jaen 23071, Spain
关键词
skin-sparing mastectomy; immediate reconstruction; breast cancer; biological mesh; BREAST-Q questionnaire; EXPANDER/IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION; TISSUE EXPANDER; IMPLANT; COMPLICATIONS; ALLODERM; SURGERY; STRATTICE(TM); METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE; RETENTION;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15225349
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We evaluate postoperative complications, aesthetic results and satisfaction outcomes in patients with breast cancer after intervening with a skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with an immediate prosthetic reconstruction with or without a biological mesh. Patients with multifocal breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ with an indication for a mastectomy and cT2 tumors with no response to primary systemic treatment were included, whereas patients aged >75 years, with inflammatory carcinoma, and severe circulatory disorders were excluded. Patients in the control group were reconstructed using a prosthesis, whereas the study group included patients reconstructed using a prosthesis and biological acellular porcine dermal mesh (Strattice (TM)). In both groups, the result was assessed using the BREAST-Q instrument. A total of 51 patients (62 intervened breasts) were included in the study group and 38 patients (41 intervened breasts) in the control group. Implant loss and removal occurred in three patients in the study group (5.9%) and nine patients in the control group (24.3%; p = 0.030). Infections appeared in three patients in the study group (4.8%) and three patients in the control group (7.3%; p = 1.00). Skin necrosis appeared in 5 patients in the study group (12.2%) and 11 patients in the control group (21.6%; p = 0.367). Seroma appeared in five patients in the study group (12.2%) and five patients in the control group (8.1%; p = 0.514). The BREAST-Q questionnaire is a comparison between both groups regarding "satisfaction with breasts after surgery" (p = 0.026), "sexual well-being after intervention" (p = 0.010) and "satisfaction with the information received" (p = 0.049). We have noted a statistically significant decrease in implant loss in women receiving an implant with a biological mesh. A higher satisfaction was observed in patients reconstructed using Strattice (TM), with statistically significant differences in three items.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
    Gamboa-Bobadilla, GM
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 56 (01) : 22 - 25
  • [32] Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cryopreserved Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate ExpanderBased Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Study
    Kim, So-Young
    Lim, So Young
    Mun, Goo-Hyun
    Bang, Sa-Ik
    Oh, Kap Sung
    Pyon, Jai-Kyong
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2015, 42 (03): : 316 - 320
  • [33] Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    Maguina, Pirko
    Grubb, Kendra
    Kalimuthu, Ramasamy
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (06) : 223E - 224E
  • [34] Clinical Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix (SimpliDerm and AlloDerm Ready-to-Use) in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Tierney, Brian P.
    De la Garza, Mauricio
    Jennings, George R.
    Weinfeld, Adam B.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [35] Acellular dermal matrix assisted immediate breast reconstruction: Audit of 5 years single centre experience
    Farkas, N.
    Kang, C.
    Pritchard, D.
    Tang, S.
    Banerjee, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S65 - S66
  • [36] Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
    Chandarana, M.
    Harries, S.
    Tenovici, A.
    Mortimer, C.
    Clarke, D.
    Banerjee, D.
    Thekkinkattil, D.
    Predolac, D.
    Ferguson, D.
    Vaughan-Williams, E.
    Osborne, G.
    Mitchell, G.
    Azmy, I
    Jones, L.
    Roche, N.
    Bhaskar, P.
    Achuthan, R.
    Rathinaezhil, R.
    Parmeshwar, R.
    Narayanan, S.
    Seetharam, S.
    Marla, S.
    Soumian, S.
    Sircar, T.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (01): : 71 - 77
  • [37] Discussion: An Algorithmic Approach for Selective Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Immediate Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Outcomes
    Hanasono, Matthew M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (02) : 189 - 190
  • [38] The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction
    Krishnan, Naveen M.
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Rosenkranz, Kari M.
    Powell, Stephen G.
    Nigriny, John F.
    Vidal, Dale C.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (04): : 468 - 476
  • [39] Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
    Varvaras, D.
    Nina, H.
    De Felice, V.
    Al-Lawati, T.
    Angeletti, M.
    Tardioli, S.
    Papadopoulos, G.
    Petrella, G.
    BREAST, 2019, 44 : S124 - S124
  • [40] Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Vardanian, Andrew J.
    Clayton, John L.
    Roostaeian, Jason
    Shirvanian, Vaheh
    Da Lio, Andrew
    Lipa, Joan E.
    Crisera, Christopher
    Festekjian, Jaco H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (05) : 403E - 410E