A large deviation principle for the empirical measures of Metropolis-Hastings chains

被引:0
|
作者
Milinanni, Federica [1 ]
Nyquist, Pierre [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Math, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Math Sci, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Math Sci, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Large deviations; Empirical measure; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Metropolis-Hastings; MARKOV PROCESS EXPECTATIONS; MONTE-CARLO; ASYMPTOTIC EVALUATION; CONVERGENCE-RATES; SPECTRAL THEORY; LIMIT-THEOREMS; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spa.2023.104293
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
To sample from a given target distribution, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling relies on constructing an ergodic Markov chain with the target distribution as its invariant measure. For any MCMC method, an important question is how to evaluate its efficiency. One approach is to consider the associated empirical measure and how fast it converges to the stationary distribution of the underlying Markov process. Recently, this question has been considered from the perspective of large deviation theory, for different types of MCMC methods, including, e.g., non -reversible Metropolis-Hastings on a finite state space, non -reversible Langevin samplers, the zig-zag sampler, and parallel tempering. This approach, based on large deviations, has proven successful in analysing existing methods and designing new, efficient ones. However, for the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm on more general state spaces, the workhorse of MCMC sampling, the same techniques have not been available for analysing performance, as the underlying Markov chain dynamics violate the conditions used to prove existing large deviation results for empirical measures of a Markov chain. This also extends to methods built on the same idea as Metropolis-Hastings, such as the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Method or ABC-MCMC. In this paper, we take the first steps towards such a large-deviations based analysis of Metropolis- Hastings -like methods, by proving a large deviation principle for the empirical measures of Metropolis-Hastings chains. In addition, we also characterize the rate function and its properties in terms of the acceptance- and rejection-part of the Metropolis-Hastings dynamics.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On a Metropolis-Hastings importance sampling estimator
    Rudolf, Daniel
    Sprungk, Bjoern
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2020, 14 (01): : 857 - 889
  • [22] Metropolis-Hastings algorithms with adaptive proposals
    Cai, Bo
    Meyer, Renate
    Perron, Francois
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2008, 18 (04) : 421 - 433
  • [23] On the geometric ergodicity of Metropolis-Hastings algorithms
    Atchade, Yves F.
    Perron, Francois
    STATISTICS, 2007, 41 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [24] Metropolis-Hastings transition kernel couplings
    O'Leary, John
    Wang, Guanyang
    ANNALES DE L INSTITUT HENRI POINCARE-PROBABILITES ET STATISTIQUES, 2024, 60 (02): : 1101 - 1124
  • [25] Maximal Couplings of the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm
    O'Leary, John
    Wang, Guanyang
    Jacob, Pierre E.
    24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS (AISTATS), 2021, 130
  • [26] Metropolis-Hastings Generative Adversarial Networks
    Turner, Ryan
    Hung, Jane
    Frank, Eric
    Saatci, Yunus
    Yosinski, Jason
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 97, 2019, 97
  • [27] Density estimation for the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm
    Sköld, M
    Roberts, GO
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2003, 30 (04) : 699 - 718
  • [28] CONVERGENCE OF CONDITIONAL METROPOLIS-HASTINGS SAMPLERS
    Jones, Galin L.
    Roberts, Gareth O.
    Rosenthal, Jeffrey S.
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2014, 46 (02) : 422 - 445
  • [29] Non-reversible Metropolis-Hastings
    Joris Bierkens
    Statistics and Computing, 2016, 26 : 1213 - 1228
  • [30] Control variates for the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm
    Hammer, Hugo
    Tjelmeland, Hakon
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2008, 35 (03) : 400 - 414