CO2 Joule-Thomson effect: Application on premium connections for CCS well

被引:3
|
作者
Boufflers, Laurent [1 ]
Martin, Pierre [1 ]
Mauger, Pierre [1 ]
Rodriguez, Diana [2 ]
机构
[1] Vallourec OneR&D Connect, 23 Route Leval, F-59620 Aulnoye Aymeries, France
[2] Vallourec Headquarter, 12 Rue Verrerie, F-92190 Meudon, France
来源
关键词
CCS; CO2; Storage; Leakage risk assessment; Safety; Joule-Thomson effect; Blow-out; Connections; Integrity; Testing methodology;
D O I
10.1016/j.ccst.2023.100185
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) is a major technology aiming to reduce greenhouse gases and reduce carbon footprint. In these applications, Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) and associated premium connections are used to inject industrial CO2 into stable geological formations such as depleted oil and gas fields or saline aquifers, in liquid or dense phase to permanently store it. While current standards (API RP 5C5, ISO 13,679) allow qualification of premium connections for Oil & Gas application, no standard exists for CCS applications. In that frame, a new test methodology was developed to evaluate the impact of Joule-Thomson effect on premium connection, in the scenario of a CO2 blow-out and intermittent operation of the injection wells, such as shut-in of the subsurface safety valve (SSSV) or injection phase. To confirm that premium connections remain tight and safe after being exposed to a rapid depressurization of CO2, they have been physically tested in a horizontal load frame. The test consisted in the filling of the sample with CO2 up to a minimum of 100 bar and a temperature below 30 degrees C to ensure liquid state, or above 32 degrees C to ensure supercritical state inside the sample, and then depressurizing the sample through an orifice of 2 or 4 mm until complete drop of pressure. Minimum measured temperature on outer pipe wall reached around -50 degrees C before dry ice CO2 formation. Maximum measured gradient of temperature observed was around 70 degrees C. No leakage nor connection damages were observed during the pressure release sequences. Sealability was then confirmed during the internal pressure and external pressure test performed afterwards.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Joule-Thomson effect in confined fluids
    Schoen, M
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 1999, 270 (3-4) : 353 - 379
  • [32] Sensitivity of Joule-Thomson cooling to impure CO2 injection in depleted gas reservoirs
    Ziabakhsh-Ganji, Zaman
    Kooi, Henk
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 : 434 - 451
  • [33] The Joule-Thomson expansion of CO2 and H2O in geothermal and volcanic processes
    Sirkis, DM
    Ulmer, GC
    Grandstaff, DE
    Flynn, NP
    WATER-ROCK INTERACTION, 1998, : 487 - 490
  • [34] The Joule-Thomson effect of (CO2+H2) binary system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS)
    Zhang, Zhongyao
    Gao, Ming
    Chen, Xiaopeng
    Wei, Xiaojie
    Liang, Jiezhen
    Wu, Chenghong
    Wang, Linlin
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 54 : 215 - 231
  • [35] Joule-Thomson effect in helium at low temperatures
    Zelmanov, JL
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-USSR, 1940, 3 : 43 - 52
  • [36] The Joule-Thomson effect in air - Second paper
    Roebuck, JR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES, 1930, 64 (5/12): : 287 - 334
  • [37] Where does the largest Joule-Thomson effect?
    Schames, Leon
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIK, 1929, 57 (11-12): : 808 - 814
  • [38] MEASUREMENT OF NEGATIVE ISOTHERMAL JOULE-THOMSON EFFECT
    OSTRONOV, MG
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY,USSR, 1971, 45 (11): : 1654 - &
  • [39] The Joule-Thomson effect in mixtures of helium and nitrogen
    Roebuck, JR
    Osterberg, H
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1938, 60 : 341 - 351
  • [40] JOULE-THOMSON EFFECT IN COMPRESSED LIQUID WATER
    POTTER, JH
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1971, 93 (03) : 63 - &