Perioperative coagulation activation after permanent pacemaker placement

被引:0
|
作者
Kalinin, Roman [1 ]
Suchkov, Igor [1 ]
Povarov, Vladislav [1 ,2 ]
Mzhavanadze, Nina [1 ]
Zhurina, Olga [3 ]
机构
[1] Ryazan State Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Endovasc Surg & Diagnost Radiol, Vysokovoltnaya 9, Ryazan 390026, Russia
[2] Ryazan State Reg Clin Cardiol Dispensary, Dept Surg Treatment Cardiac Arrhythmias & Cardiac, Ryazan 390026, Russia
[3] Ryazan State Med Univ, Sci & Clin Ctr Hematol Oncol & Immunol, Ryazan 390026, Russia
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2023年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
Hemostasis; Blood coagulation; Cardiac pacemaker; Anticoagulants; Postoperative complications; ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; IMPLANTATION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.4330/wjc.v15.i4.174
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Bradyarrhythmias are typically treated with permanent pacemakers (PM). The elimination of bradyarrhythmia by PM implantation improves the patient's quality of life and prognosis, but it can also result in a number of sequalae. It is still unclear how PM implantation affects the hemostasis system's parameters and how such parameters relate to different consequences after PM placement. AIM To assess the blood coagulation factor activity in PM patients throughout the perioperative period. METHODS Patients treated in the Department of Surgical Therapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Pacing at the Ryazan State "Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary" from April 2020 to December 2021 were included in the study. Before surgery, 7 and 30 d after PM placement, peripheral venous blood samples were withdrawn to measure the level of blood coagulation factor I (FI) and the activity of blood coagulation factors II (FII), V (FV), VII (FVII), VIII (FVIII), IX (FIX), X (FX), XI (FXI), XII (FXII). We used an automatic coagulometer Sysmex CA 660 (Sysmex Europe, Germany) and reagents from Siemens (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Germany). RESULTS The study included 146 patients. The activity of factors FV [147.7 (102.1-247.55)% vs 103.85 (60-161.6)% vs 81.8 (67.15-130.65)%, P = 0.002], FVIII [80.4 (60.15-106.25)% vs 70.3 (48.5-89.1)% vs 63.7 (41.6-88.25)%, P = 0.039], FIX [86.2 (70.75-102.95)% vs 75.4 (59.2-88.3)% vs 73.9 (56.45-93.05)%, P = 0.014], FX [188.9 (99.3-308.18)% vs 158.9 (83.3-230)% vs 127.2 (95.25-209.35)%, P = 0.022], FXI [82.6 (63.9-103.6)% vs 69.75 (53.8-97.6)% vs 67.3 (54.25-98.05)%, P = 0.002], FXII [87.6 (67.15-102.3)% vs 78.9 (63.4-97.05)% vs 81.2 (62.15-97.4)%, P < 0.001] decreased at 7 and 30 d after surgery; FII activity [157.9 (109.7-245.25)% vs 130 (86.8-192.5)% vs 144.8 (103.31-185.6)%, P = 0.021] decreased at 7 d and increased at 30 d postoperatively. There were no statistically significant changes in the FVII activity within 30 d after PM placement [182.2 (85.1-344.8)% vs 157.2 (99.1-259)% vs 108.9 (74.9-219.8)%, P = 0.128]. Subgroup analysis revealed similar changes only in patients on anticoagulant therapy. FXII activity decreased in patients on antiplatelet therapy [82 (65.8-101.9)% vs 79.9 (63.3-97.1)% vs 89.7 (75.7-102.5)%, P = 0.01] 7 d after surgery, returning to baseline values at 30 d postoperatively. CONCLUSION PM placement and anticoagulant therapy were associated with decreased activity of clotting factors FV, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI, FXII in the postoperative period. FVII activity did not decrease within 30 d after PM placement, which may indicate endothelial injury caused by lead placement.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 183
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transiliac permanent pacemaker implantation after extraction of infected pectoral pacemaker systems
    Erdogan, O
    Augostini, R
    Saliba, W
    Juratli, N
    Wilkoff, BL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 84 (04): : 474 - +
  • [32] PERMANENT PACEMAKER PLACEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBELLAR STROKE- MEDIATED AUTONOMIC DYSREGULATION
    Kohm, Kevin
    Pagan, Eric
    Xu, Jack
    Johns, Jeremy
    Bose, Vivek
    Tang, Delphine
    Moussouttas, Michael
    Kassotis, John
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (SUPPL 1) : S539 - S539
  • [33] Maneuvers to enhance cephalic vein access in permanent pacemaker and implantable defibrillator placement
    Khalighi, K
    Dodd, SE
    Knecht, J
    Smith, J
    CHEST, 2003, 124 (04) : 156S - 156S
  • [34] Placement of permanent pacemaker in a patient with venous anomaly through the right subclavian vein
    Celik, Ibrahim Etem
    Duran, Mustafa
    Yarlioglu, Mikail
    Murat, Sani Namik
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 42 (01) : 75 - 76
  • [35] IMPACT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY ON PERMANENT PACEMAKER PLACEMENT AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Tatusov, Alexey
    DeLago, Augustin
    Torosoff, Mikhail
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1355 - 1355
  • [36] Predictors of thrombosis after transvenous permanent pacemaker implantation
    Jarwe, M
    Messaoudene, SA
    Klug, D
    Marquie, C
    Kouakam, C
    Lacroix, D
    Kacet, S
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 787 - 787
  • [37] Troponin T elevation after permanent pacemaker implantation
    Chen, Xueying
    Yu, Ziqing
    Bai, Jin
    Hu, Shulan
    Wang, Wei
    Qin, Shengmei
    Wang, Jingfeng
    Sun, Zhe
    Su, Yangang
    Ge, Junbo
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 49 (02) : 211 - 218
  • [38] Reevaluation of indications for permanent pacemaker implantation after cardioneuroablation
    Wileczek, Antoni
    Stodolkiewicz-Nowarska, Edyta
    Reichert, Agnieszka
    Kustron, Anna
    Sledz, Janusz
    Biernikiewicz, Wojciech
    Orlik, Bartlomiej
    Lipka, Michal
    Kutarski, Andrzej
    Hering, Dagmara
    Zajac, Magdalena
    Stec, Sebastia
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2023, 81 (12) : 1272 - 1275
  • [39] Intrapericardial Diaphragmatic Hernia after Pediatric Pacemaker Placement
    Dehmer, Jeffrey J.
    Weiner, Timothy M.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2011, 77 (11) : E250 - E251
  • [40] PACEMAKER PLACEMENT
    HAYWOOD, LJ
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 288 (02): : 104 - 104