Perioperative coagulation activation after permanent pacemaker placement

被引:0
|
作者
Kalinin, Roman [1 ]
Suchkov, Igor [1 ]
Povarov, Vladislav [1 ,2 ]
Mzhavanadze, Nina [1 ]
Zhurina, Olga [3 ]
机构
[1] Ryazan State Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Endovasc Surg & Diagnost Radiol, Vysokovoltnaya 9, Ryazan 390026, Russia
[2] Ryazan State Reg Clin Cardiol Dispensary, Dept Surg Treatment Cardiac Arrhythmias & Cardiac, Ryazan 390026, Russia
[3] Ryazan State Med Univ, Sci & Clin Ctr Hematol Oncol & Immunol, Ryazan 390026, Russia
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2023年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
Hemostasis; Blood coagulation; Cardiac pacemaker; Anticoagulants; Postoperative complications; ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; IMPLANTATION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.4330/wjc.v15.i4.174
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Bradyarrhythmias are typically treated with permanent pacemakers (PM). The elimination of bradyarrhythmia by PM implantation improves the patient's quality of life and prognosis, but it can also result in a number of sequalae. It is still unclear how PM implantation affects the hemostasis system's parameters and how such parameters relate to different consequences after PM placement. AIM To assess the blood coagulation factor activity in PM patients throughout the perioperative period. METHODS Patients treated in the Department of Surgical Therapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Pacing at the Ryazan State "Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary" from April 2020 to December 2021 were included in the study. Before surgery, 7 and 30 d after PM placement, peripheral venous blood samples were withdrawn to measure the level of blood coagulation factor I (FI) and the activity of blood coagulation factors II (FII), V (FV), VII (FVII), VIII (FVIII), IX (FIX), X (FX), XI (FXI), XII (FXII). We used an automatic coagulometer Sysmex CA 660 (Sysmex Europe, Germany) and reagents from Siemens (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Germany). RESULTS The study included 146 patients. The activity of factors FV [147.7 (102.1-247.55)% vs 103.85 (60-161.6)% vs 81.8 (67.15-130.65)%, P = 0.002], FVIII [80.4 (60.15-106.25)% vs 70.3 (48.5-89.1)% vs 63.7 (41.6-88.25)%, P = 0.039], FIX [86.2 (70.75-102.95)% vs 75.4 (59.2-88.3)% vs 73.9 (56.45-93.05)%, P = 0.014], FX [188.9 (99.3-308.18)% vs 158.9 (83.3-230)% vs 127.2 (95.25-209.35)%, P = 0.022], FXI [82.6 (63.9-103.6)% vs 69.75 (53.8-97.6)% vs 67.3 (54.25-98.05)%, P = 0.002], FXII [87.6 (67.15-102.3)% vs 78.9 (63.4-97.05)% vs 81.2 (62.15-97.4)%, P < 0.001] decreased at 7 and 30 d after surgery; FII activity [157.9 (109.7-245.25)% vs 130 (86.8-192.5)% vs 144.8 (103.31-185.6)%, P = 0.021] decreased at 7 d and increased at 30 d postoperatively. There were no statistically significant changes in the FVII activity within 30 d after PM placement [182.2 (85.1-344.8)% vs 157.2 (99.1-259)% vs 108.9 (74.9-219.8)%, P = 0.128]. Subgroup analysis revealed similar changes only in patients on anticoagulant therapy. FXII activity decreased in patients on antiplatelet therapy [82 (65.8-101.9)% vs 79.9 (63.3-97.1)% vs 89.7 (75.7-102.5)%, P = 0.01] 7 d after surgery, returning to baseline values at 30 d postoperatively. CONCLUSION PM placement and anticoagulant therapy were associated with decreased activity of clotting factors FV, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI, FXII in the postoperative period. FVII activity did not decrease within 30 d after PM placement, which may indicate endothelial injury caused by lead placement.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 183
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TRENDS AND OUTCOMES OF PERMANENT PACEMAKER PLACEMENT IN TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Aung, Pyi Phyo
    Park, Kyeeun
    Wu, Fangcheng
    Xi, Qianlan
    Khanal, Kishor
    Cu, Cameron J.
    Nge, Htoo Myat
    Khalili, Houman
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 998 - 998
  • [22] Permanent Pacemaker Placement Secondary to Remdesivir Induced Bradycardia: A Case Report
    Khan, Shahkar
    Mustafa, Ahmad
    Elhosseiny, Sherif M.
    Rizvi, Taqi
    Lafferty, James
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [23] INTERFERENCE OF CONTRALATERAL PERMANENT PACEMAKER PLACEMENT WITH EMERGENT CENTRAL VENOUS ACCESS
    Studer, Nicholas M.
    Lucero, Pedro F.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 55 (05): : E129 - E130
  • [24] Commentary: Thoracoscopic epicardial permanent pacemaker lead placement: An alternative not a substitute
    Said, Sameh M.
    JTCVS TECHNIQUES, 2021, 7 : 251 - 252
  • [25] CORONARY-ARTERY FISTULA FORMATION SECONDARY TO PERMANENT PACEMAKER PLACEMENT
    SAEIAN, K
    VELLINGA, T
    TROUP, P
    WETHERBEE, J
    CHEST, 1991, 99 (03) : 780 - 781
  • [26] Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy after Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
    Hsu, Chen-Tung
    Chen, Cheng-Yun
    Liung, Hsin-Li
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 26 (04) : 264 - 267
  • [27] Pneumopericardium and pneumothorax after permanent pacemaker implantation
    Sebastian, CC
    Wu, WC
    Shafer, M
    Choudhary, G
    Patel, PM
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (05): : 466 - 468
  • [28] Unusual complication after permanent pacemaker insertion
    Maart, Clint Anthony
    Bokhari, Awais
    Uregbula, David
    EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (04): : 553 - 553
  • [29] LIFE EXPECTANCY AFTER PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION
    CHOKSHI, AB
    FRIEDMAN, HS
    VASAVADA, BC
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (03): : A609 - A609
  • [30] Thromboembolic Events During the Perioperative Period in Patients Undergoing Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
    Chen, Songwen
    Liu, Jing
    Pan, Wenzhi
    Liu, Shaowen
    Su, Yangang
    Bai, Jin
    Wang, Wei
    Ge, Junbo
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (02) : 83 - 87