Influence of magnetic field on a novel scintillation dosimeter in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:0
|
作者
Oolbekkink, Stijn [1 ,3 ]
van Asselen, Bram [1 ]
Woodings, Simon J. [1 ]
Wolthaus, Jochem W. H. [1 ]
de Vries, J. H. Wilfred [1 ]
van Appeldoorn, Adriaan A. [1 ]
Feijoo, Marcos [2 ]
van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon [1 ]
Raaymakers, Bas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Blue Phys, Lutz, FL USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
MRI-linac; radiotherapy; scintillation dosimetry; time-resolved dosimetry; RELATIVE DOSIMETRY; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; RADIOTHERAPY; DETECTORS; AIR; MV;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14180
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and validation of an EGSnrc accelerator head model for a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Friedel, M.
    Nachbar, M.
    Moennich, D.
    Dohm, O.
    Zips, D.
    Thorwarth, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S110 - S111
  • [32] Towards Best Practice Guidelines for Reference Dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Iakovenko, V.
    Keller, B.
    Nusrat, H.
    Sahgal, A.
    Sarfehnia, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E441 - E441
  • [33] First MLC- tracking on the 1.5T MR-linac system
    Glitzner, M.
    Woodhead, P. L.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S101 - S102
  • [34] Performance characterization of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5T MR-linac
    Oolbekkink, S.
    van Asselen, B.
    Woodings, S.
    Wolthaus, J.
    de Vries, W.
    van Appeldoorn, A.
    Feijoo, M.
    van den Dobbelsteen, M.
    Raaymakers, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S470 - S471
  • [35] Dose Calculation Accuracy of Beam Models in RadCalc for a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Sung, Jiwon
    Choi, Yeonho
    Kim, Jun Won
    Lee, Ho
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [36] Evaluation of the Geometric Distortion in Clinical MR Sequences for a 1.5T MR-Linac System
    Aima, M.
    Slagowski, J. M.
    Ding, Y.
    Vedam, S.
    Yang, J.
    Hwang, K.
    Szklaruk, J.
    Choi, S.
    Fuller, C. D.
    Chung, C.
    Wang, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E684 - E685
  • [37] Patient Experience of MR-guided Radiotherapy using a 1.5T MR-Linac
    Westerhoff, J.
    van Otterloo, S. de Mol
    Leer, T.
    Daamen, L.
    Rutgers, R.
    Meijers, L.
    Intven, M.
    Verkooijen, H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S109 - S110
  • [38] Acute toxicity of MR-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer at the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Moller, P. K.
    Gornitzka, J.
    Bernchou, U.
    Dysager, L.
    Bertelsen, A. S.
    Nyborg, C. J.
    Schytte, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S401 - S402
  • [39] Comparison of Skin Dose for Brain Cancer Patients Between a 1.5 T MR-Linac and a Conventional Linac
    Kim, A.
    McCann, C.
    Ruschin, M. E.
    Tseng, C. L.
    Sahgal, A.
    Keller, B. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E279 - E279
  • [40] Repeatability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer at a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Habrich, Jonas
    Boeke, Simon
    Nachbar, Marcel
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Schick, Fritz
    Gani, Cihan
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 174 : 141 - 148