Influence of magnetic field on a novel scintillation dosimeter in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:0
|
作者
Oolbekkink, Stijn [1 ,3 ]
van Asselen, Bram [1 ]
Woodings, Simon J. [1 ]
Wolthaus, Jochem W. H. [1 ]
de Vries, J. H. Wilfred [1 ]
van Appeldoorn, Adriaan A. [1 ]
Feijoo, Marcos [2 ]
van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon [1 ]
Raaymakers, Bas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Blue Phys, Lutz, FL USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
MRI-linac; radiotherapy; scintillation dosimetry; time-resolved dosimetry; RELATIVE DOSIMETRY; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; RADIOTHERAPY; DETECTORS; AIR; MV;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14180
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of a cylindrical diode array for use in a 1.5 T MR-linac
    Houweling, A. C.
    de Vries, J. H. W.
    Wolthaus, J.
    Woodings, S.
    Kok, J. G. M.
    van Asselen, B.
    Smit, K.
    Bel, A.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (03): : N80 - N89
  • [22] Pulse sequence optimization in pelvis on a 1.5T MR-Linac
    Zhou, Y.
    Yuan, J.
    Ho, Y. W.
    Yang, B.
    Ho, L. C.
    Cheung, K. Y.
    Yu, S. K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S963 - S963
  • [23] Performance of a multileaf collimator system for a 1.5T MR-linac
    Zhang, Ke
    Tian, Yuan
    Li, Minghui
    Men, Kuo
    Dai, Jianrong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (02) : 546 - 555
  • [24] Markerless liver stereotactic body radiotherapy on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Gani, C.
    Simon, B.
    Nachbar, M.
    Stolte, A.
    Boldt, J.
    Marks, C.
    Thorwarth, D.
    Zips, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S907 - S908
  • [25] Gated Beam Dosimetry Properties of a 1.5T MR-Linac
    Chen, X.
    Omari, E.
    Tai, A.
    Jassar, H.
    Zhang, Y.
    Paulson, E.
    Ahunbay, E.
    Sandin, C.
    Kydonieos, M.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E318 - E318
  • [26] Experimental determination of magnetic field quality conversion factors for eleven ionization chambers in 1.5 T and 0.35 T MR-linac systems
    Orlando, Nathan
    Crosby, Jennie
    Glide-Hurst, Carri
    Culberson, Wesley
    Keller, Brian
    Sarfehnia, Arman
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (04) : 2998 - 3009
  • [27] Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
    Zhang, Yan
    Yan, Shaojie
    Cui, Zhen
    Wang, Yungang
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Baosheng
    Quan, Hong
    Zhu, Jian
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (07) : 4027 - 4037
  • [28] Technical Note: Investigating the impact of field size on patient selection for the 1.5T MR-Linac
    Chuter, Robert W.
    Whitehurst, Philip
    Choudhury, Ananya
    van Herk, Marcel
    McWilliam, Alan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (11) : 5667 - 5671
  • [29] Time trends for online adapative treatment on the 1.5T MR-Linac
    Westerhoff, J.
    Daamen, A.
    de Groot-van Breugel, E. N.
    van Zyp, J. R. N. van der Voort
    Verhoeff, J. J. C.
    Mook, S.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    Intven, M. P. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S110 - S111
  • [30] Performance of a Multi Leaf Collimator System On 1.5T MR-Linac
    Zhang, K.
    Tian, Y.
    Men, K.
    Dai, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E827 - E827