Influence of magnetic field on a novel scintillation dosimeter in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:0
|
作者
Oolbekkink, Stijn [1 ,3 ]
van Asselen, Bram [1 ]
Woodings, Simon J. [1 ]
Wolthaus, Jochem W. H. [1 ]
de Vries, J. H. Wilfred [1 ]
van Appeldoorn, Adriaan A. [1 ]
Feijoo, Marcos [2 ]
van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon [1 ]
Raaymakers, Bas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Blue Phys, Lutz, FL USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
MRI-linac; radiotherapy; scintillation dosimetry; time-resolved dosimetry; RELATIVE DOSIMETRY; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; RADIOTHERAPY; DETECTORS; AIR; MV;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14180
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence and optimization strategy of the magnetic field in 1.5 T MR-linac liver stereotactic radiotherapy
    Xin Liu
    Peijun Yin
    Tengxiang Li
    Yong Yin
    Zhenjiang Li
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [2] Influence and optimization strategy of the magnetic field in 1.5 T MR-linac liver stereotactic radiotherapy
    Liu, Xin
    Yin, Peijun
    Li, Tengxiang
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Zhenjiang
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [3] Performance of the HYPERSCINT scintillation dosimetry research platform for the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Uijtewaal, Prescilla
    Cote, Benjamin
    Foppen, Thomas
    de Vries, Wilfred
    Woodings, Simon
    Borman, Pim
    Lambert-Girard, Simon
    Therriault-Proulx, Francois
    Raaymakers, Bas
    Fast, Martin
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (04):
  • [4] The Quality Assurance of a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Riis, Hans Lynggaard
    Chick, Joan
    Dunlop, Alex
    Tilly, David
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 120 - 128
  • [5] Performance Characterization of a Clinical 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Keller, B.
    Kim, A.
    Iakovenko, V.
    Ruschin, M.
    McCann, C.
    Beachey, D.
    Chugh, B.
    Elzibak, A.
    Sahgal, A.
    Sarfehnia, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E827 - E827
  • [6] Evaluation of Detectors for Relative Dosimetry Measurements in the Presence of a 1.5 T Magnetic Field From An MR-Linac
    O'Brien, D. J.
    Dolan, J.
    Pencea, S.
    Schupp, N.
    Sawakuchi, G. O.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3152 - 3153
  • [7] The Dosimetric Feasibility of the 1.5T MR-Linac System for Esophageal Cancer: The Impact of the Magnetic Field
    Li, Z.
    Yin, Y.
    Zhu, J.
    Li, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : S187 - S187
  • [8] Relative dosimetry in a 1.5 T magnetic field: an MR-linac compatible prototype scanning water phantom
    Smit, K.
    Sjoholm, J.
    Kok, J. G. M.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (15): : 4099 - 4109
  • [9] Evaluation of a Novel Plastic Scintillation Detector Performance in MR-LINAC
    Yun, K.
    Hwang, M.
    Lee, D.
    Oh, S.
    Feijoo, M.
    Beron, S.
    Pavord, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E912 - E913
  • [10] Comparison of the Adaptation Algorithms on the 1.5T MR-Linac
    Nachbar, M.
    Moennich, D.
    Marks, C.
    Stolte, A.
    Weidner, N.
    Paulsen, F.
    Dohm, O.
    Mueller, A. -C
    Thorwarth, D.
    Zips, D.
    Gani, C.
    Boeke, S.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 : S12 - S12