Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post- procedural mortality: a model development and validation study

被引:11
|
作者
Ouyang, David [1 ,2 ]
Theurer, John [1 ]
Stein, Nathan R. [1 ]
Hughes, J. Weston [4 ]
Elias, Pierre [9 ,10 ]
He, Bryan [4 ]
Yuan, Neal [1 ]
Duffy, Grant [1 ]
Sandhu, Roopinder K. [1 ]
Ebinger, Joseph [1 ]
Botting, Patrick [1 ]
Jujjavarapu, Melvin [1 ]
Claggett, Brian [11 ]
Tooley, James E. [5 ]
Poterucha, Tim [9 ]
Chen, Jonathan H. [6 ]
Nurok, Michael [3 ]
Perez, Marco [5 ]
Perotte, Adler [9 ]
Zou, James Y. [4 ,7 ,8 ]
Cook, Nancy R. [12 ]
Chugh, Sumeet S. [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Susan [1 ]
Albert, Christine M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Smidt Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Cente, Div Artificial Intelligence Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Anesthesia, Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Palo Alto, CA, India
[5] Stanford Univ, Div Cardiol, Palo Alto, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Div Bioinformat Res, Palo Alto, CA USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Palo Alto, CA USA
[9] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Milstein Div Cardiol, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[10] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[11] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Boston, MA USA
[12] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Prevent Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE TROPONIN LEVELS; CARDIAC RISK; CALCULATOR; DERIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00220-0
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Preoperative risk assessments used in clinical practice are insufficient in their ability to identify risk for postoperative mortality. Deep-learning analysis of electrocardiography can identify hidden risk markers that can help to prognosticate postoperative mortality. We aimed to develop a prognostic model that accurately predicts postoperative mortality in patients undergoing medical procedures and who had received preoperative electrocardiographic diagnostic testing. Methods In a derivation cohort of preoperative patients with available electrocardiograms (ECGs) from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA, USA) between Jan 1, 2015 and Dec 31, 2019, a deep-learning algorithm was developed to leverage waveform signals to discriminate postoperative mortality. We randomly split patients (8:1:1) into subsets for training, internal validation, and final algorithm test analyses. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in the hold-out test dataset and in two external hospital cohorts and compared with the established Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score. The primary outcome was post-procedural mortality across three health-care systems. Findings 45 969 patients had a complete ECG waveform image available for at least one 12-lead ECG performed within the 30 days before the procedure date (59 975 inpatient procedures and 112 794 ECGs): 36 839 patients in the training dataset, 4549 in the internal validation dataset, and 4581 in the internal test dataset. In the held-out internal test cohort, the algorithm discriminates mortality with an AUC value of 0 center dot 83 (95% CI 0 center dot 79-0 center dot 87), surpassing the discrimination of the RCRI score with an AUC of 0 center dot 67 (0 center dot 61-0 center dot 72). The algorithm similarly discriminated risk for mortality in two independent US health-care systems, with AUCs of 0 center dot 79 (0 center dot 75-0 center dot 83) and 0 center dot 75 (0 center dot 74-0 center dot 76), respectively. Patients determined to be high risk by the deep-learning model had an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 8 center dot 83 (5 center dot 57-13 center dot 20) for postoperative mortality compared with an unadjusted OR of 2 center dot 08 (0 center dot 77-3 center dot 50) for postoperative mortality for RCRI scores of more than 2. The deep-learning algorithm performed similarly for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (AUC 0 center dot 85 [0 center dot 77-0 center dot 92]), non-cardiac surgery (AUC 0 center dot 83 [0 center dot 79-0 center dot 88]), and catheterisation or endoscopy suite procedures (AUC 0 center dot 76 [0 center dot 72-0 center dot 81]). Interpretation A deep-learning algorithm interpreting preoperative ECGs can improve discrimination of postoperative mortality. The deep-learning algorithm worked equally well for risk stratification of cardiac surgeries, non-cardiac surgeries, and catheterisation laboratory procedures, and was validated in three independent health-care systems. This algorithm can provide additional information to clinicians making the decision to perform medical procedures and the risk of future
引用
收藏
页码:e70 / e78
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and validation of a time-dependent risk model for predicting mortality in infective endocarditis
    Sy, Raymond W.
    Chawantanpipat, Chirapan
    Richmond, David R.
    Kritharides, Leonard
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (16) : 2016 - 2026
  • [42] Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis
    Wang, Xiaoqian
    Li, Shuai
    Cao, Quanxia
    Chang, Jingjing
    Pan, Jingjing
    Wang, Qingtong
    Wang, Nan
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (16)
  • [43] Early sepsis mortality prediction model based on interpretable machine learning approach: development and validation study
    Wang, Yiping
    Gao, Zhihong
    Zhang, Yang
    Lu, Zhongqiu
    Sun, Fangyuan
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, : 909 - 918
  • [44] Predicting Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay and Mortality Using Patient Vital Signs: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation
    Alghatani, Khalid
    Ammar, Nariman
    Rezgui, Abdelmounaam
    Shaban-Nejad, Arash
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [45] Semisupervised Deep Learning Techniques for Predicting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome From Time-Series Clinical Data: Model Development and Validation Study
    Lam, Carson
    Tso, Chak Foon
    Green-Saxena, Abigail
    Pellegrini, Emily
    Iqbal, Zohora
    Evans, Daniel
    Hoffman, Jana
    Calvert, Jacob
    Mao, Qingqing
    Das, Ritankar
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (09)
  • [46] Development and validation of an ensemble machine-learning model for predicting early mortality among patients with bone metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Long, Ze
    Yi, Min
    Qin, Yong
    Ye, Qianwen
    Che, Xiaotong
    Wang, Shengjie
    Lei, Mingxing
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [47] Predicting Complications in Breast Reconstruction Development and Prospective Validation of a Machine Learning Model
    Braun, Sterling E.
    Sinik, Lauren M.
    Meyer, Anne M.
    Larson, Kelsey E.
    Butterworth, James A.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 91 (02) : 282 - 286
  • [48] Predicting Intensive Care Delirium with Machine Learning: Model Development and External Validation
    Gong, Kirby D.
    Lu, Ryan
    Bergamaschi, Teya S.
    Sanyal, Akaash
    Guo, Joanna
    Kim, Han B.
    Nguyen, Hieu T.
    Greenstein, Joseph L.
    Winslow, Raimond L.
    Stevens, Robert D.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 138 (03) : 299 - 311
  • [49] Machine learning prediction model for post- hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study
    Wang, Jitao
    Zheng, Tianlei
    Liao, Yong
    Geng, Shi
    Li, Jinlong
    Zhang, Zhanguo
    Shang, Dong
    Liu, Chengyu
    Yu, Peng
    Huang, Yifei
    Liu, Chuan
    Liu, Yanna
    Liu, Shanghao
    Wang, Mingguang
    Liu, Dengxiang
    Miao, Hongrui
    Li, Shuang
    Zhang, Biao
    Huang, Anliang
    Zhang, Yewei
    Qi, Xiaolong
    Chen, Shubo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [50] Development of Deep Learning Models for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality Using an Administrative Claims Database: Retrospective Cohort Study
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Yamana, Hayato
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (02)