Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post- procedural mortality: a model development and validation study

被引:11
|
作者
Ouyang, David [1 ,2 ]
Theurer, John [1 ]
Stein, Nathan R. [1 ]
Hughes, J. Weston [4 ]
Elias, Pierre [9 ,10 ]
He, Bryan [4 ]
Yuan, Neal [1 ]
Duffy, Grant [1 ]
Sandhu, Roopinder K. [1 ]
Ebinger, Joseph [1 ]
Botting, Patrick [1 ]
Jujjavarapu, Melvin [1 ]
Claggett, Brian [11 ]
Tooley, James E. [5 ]
Poterucha, Tim [9 ]
Chen, Jonathan H. [6 ]
Nurok, Michael [3 ]
Perez, Marco [5 ]
Perotte, Adler [9 ]
Zou, James Y. [4 ,7 ,8 ]
Cook, Nancy R. [12 ]
Chugh, Sumeet S. [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Susan [1 ]
Albert, Christine M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Smidt Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Cente, Div Artificial Intelligence Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Anesthesia, Los Angeles, CA 90035 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Palo Alto, CA, India
[5] Stanford Univ, Div Cardiol, Palo Alto, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Div Bioinformat Res, Palo Alto, CA USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Palo Alto, CA USA
[9] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Milstein Div Cardiol, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[10] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[11] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Boston, MA USA
[12] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Prevent Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE TROPONIN LEVELS; CARDIAC RISK; CALCULATOR; DERIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00220-0
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Preoperative risk assessments used in clinical practice are insufficient in their ability to identify risk for postoperative mortality. Deep-learning analysis of electrocardiography can identify hidden risk markers that can help to prognosticate postoperative mortality. We aimed to develop a prognostic model that accurately predicts postoperative mortality in patients undergoing medical procedures and who had received preoperative electrocardiographic diagnostic testing. Methods In a derivation cohort of preoperative patients with available electrocardiograms (ECGs) from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA, USA) between Jan 1, 2015 and Dec 31, 2019, a deep-learning algorithm was developed to leverage waveform signals to discriminate postoperative mortality. We randomly split patients (8:1:1) into subsets for training, internal validation, and final algorithm test analyses. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in the hold-out test dataset and in two external hospital cohorts and compared with the established Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score. The primary outcome was post-procedural mortality across three health-care systems. Findings 45 969 patients had a complete ECG waveform image available for at least one 12-lead ECG performed within the 30 days before the procedure date (59 975 inpatient procedures and 112 794 ECGs): 36 839 patients in the training dataset, 4549 in the internal validation dataset, and 4581 in the internal test dataset. In the held-out internal test cohort, the algorithm discriminates mortality with an AUC value of 0 center dot 83 (95% CI 0 center dot 79-0 center dot 87), surpassing the discrimination of the RCRI score with an AUC of 0 center dot 67 (0 center dot 61-0 center dot 72). The algorithm similarly discriminated risk for mortality in two independent US health-care systems, with AUCs of 0 center dot 79 (0 center dot 75-0 center dot 83) and 0 center dot 75 (0 center dot 74-0 center dot 76), respectively. Patients determined to be high risk by the deep-learning model had an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 8 center dot 83 (5 center dot 57-13 center dot 20) for postoperative mortality compared with an unadjusted OR of 2 center dot 08 (0 center dot 77-3 center dot 50) for postoperative mortality for RCRI scores of more than 2. The deep-learning algorithm performed similarly for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (AUC 0 center dot 85 [0 center dot 77-0 center dot 92]), non-cardiac surgery (AUC 0 center dot 83 [0 center dot 79-0 center dot 88]), and catheterisation or endoscopy suite procedures (AUC 0 center dot 76 [0 center dot 72-0 center dot 81]). Interpretation A deep-learning algorithm interpreting preoperative ECGs can improve discrimination of postoperative mortality. The deep-learning algorithm worked equally well for risk stratification of cardiac surgeries, non-cardiac surgeries, and catheterisation laboratory procedures, and was validated in three independent health-care systems. This algorithm can provide additional information to clinicians making the decision to perform medical procedures and the risk of future
引用
收藏
页码:e70 / e78
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality for ischemic stroke patients in ICU
    Luo, Xiao
    Li, Binghan
    Zhu, Ronghui
    Tai, Yaoyong
    Wang, Zongyu
    He, Qian
    Zhao, Yanfang
    Bi, Xiaoying
    Wu, Cheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 198
  • [22] Development and Prospective Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Predicting Need for Mechanical Ventilation
    Shashikumar, Supreeth P.
    Wardi, Gabriel
    Paul, Paulina
    Carlile, Morgan
    Brenner, Laura N.
    Hibbert, Kathryn A.
    North, Crystal M.
    Mukerji, Shibani
    Robbins, Gregory
    Shao, Yu-Ping
    Westover, Brandon
    Nemati, Shamim
    Malhotra, Atul
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (06) : 2264 - 2273
  • [23] Development and validation of a predicting model for risk of mortality in heart failure patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction post discharge
    Zhu, Y. L.
    Liu, Z. C.
    Huang, H. B.
    Wu, M. X.
    Zhang, L. L.
    Liao, M.
    Zhao, W. J.
    He, W. F.
    Tan, D.
    Zeng, J. P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [24] Predicting Depression in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Using Machine Learning: Model Development and Validation Study
    Nowinka, Zuzanna
    Alagha, M. Abdulhadi
    Mahmoud, Khadija
    Jones, Gareth G.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (09)
  • [25] Development and validation of an interpretable model for predicting sepsis mortality across care settings
    Lee, Young Seok
    Han, Seungbong
    Lee, Ye Eun
    Cho, Jaehwa
    Choi, Young Kyun
    Yoon, Sun-Young
    Oh, Dong Kyu
    Lee, Su Yeon
    Park, Mi Hyeon
    Lim, Chae-Man
    Moon, Jae Young
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [26] Deep-learning model for predicting 30-day postoperative mortality
    Fritz, Bradley A.
    Cui, Zhicheng
    Zhang, Muhan
    He, Yujie
    Chen, Yixin
    Kronzer, Alex
    Ben Abdallah, Arbi
    King, Christopher R.
    Avidan, Michael S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 123 (05) : 688 - 695
  • [27] Integrated machine learning and deep learning for predicting diabetic nephropathy model construction, validation, and interpretability
    Ma, Junjie
    An, Shaoguang
    Cao, Mohan
    Zhang, Lei
    Lu, Jin
    ENDOCRINE, 2024, 85 (02) : 615 - 625
  • [28] Development, validation, and feature extraction of a deep learning model predicting in-hospital mortality using Japan's largest national ICU database: a validation framework for transparent clinical Artificial Intelligence (cAI) development
    Ishii, Euma
    Nawa, Nobutoshi
    Hashimoto, Satoru
    Shigemitsu, Hidenobu
    Fujiwara, Takeo
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (02)
  • [29] Development, comparative study, and external validation of a new deep learning model for predicting genome-wide gene expression from histopathology slides
    Gugel, Leon
    Kinar, Yaron
    Michalska-Falkowska, Anna
    Reszec-Gielazyn, Joanna
    Bauer, Witold
    Niemira, Magdalena
    Temkin, Boris
    Beker, Tuvik
    Aharonov, Ranit
    Dinstag, Gal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [30] Development and validation of a pathogenomics model to improve the risk stratification of breast cancer: A deep learning study
    Ruichong, L.
    Wang, Z.
    Gu, Y.
    Ou, Q.
    Yu, C.
    Yu, Y.
    Su, W.
    Yao, H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S1433 - S1434