Experts' perspectives on how to promote implicit and explicit motor learning in children: A mixed-methods study

被引:1
|
作者
van der Veer, Ingrid P. A. [1 ,5 ]
Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G. [2 ]
Rameckers, Eugene A. A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Klingels, Katrijn [1 ]
机构
[1] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr REVAL, Hasselt, Belgium
[2] Maastricht Univ, Res Sch CAPHRI, Dept Epidemiol Functioning Participat & Rehabilita, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Res Sch CAPHRI, Dept Rehabil Med Functioning Participat & Rehabili, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Adelante Rehabil Ctr, Ctr Expertise, Valkenburg, Netherlands
[5] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr REVAL, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
children; clinical decision making; explicit motor learning; feedback; implicit motor learning; instructions; mixed-methods study; DEVELOPMENTAL COORDINATION DISORDER; ATTENTION; FOCUS; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; THERAPY; SKILL;
D O I
10.1111/cch.13147
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundLittle is known about how motor learning strategies (MLSs) can promote implicit and explicit motor learning processes. This study aimed to explore experts' perspectives on therapists' use of MLSs to promote specific learning processes in children with and without developmental coordination disorder (DCD). MethodsIn this mixed-methods study, two consecutive digital questionnaires were used to ascertain the opinions of international experts. Questionnaire 2 explored the findings of Questionnaire 1 in greater depth. In order to reach a certain level of agreement about the classification of MLSs as promoting either (more) implicit or (more) explicit motor learning, 5-point Likert scales were used in addition to open-ended questions. The open-ended questions were analysed with a conventional analysis approach. Open coding was performed by two reviewers independently. Categories and themes were discussed within the research team, taking both questionnaires as one dataset. ResultsTwenty-nine experts from nine different countries with different backgrounds in research, education and/or clinical care completed the questionnaires. The results of the Likert scales showed large variation. Two themes emerged from the qualitative analyses: (1) Experts found it difficult to classify MLSs as promoting either implicit or explicit motor learning, and (2) experts stressed the need for clinical decisionmaking when choosing MLSs. ConclusionsInsufficient insight was gained into how MLSs could promote (more) implicit or (more) explicit motor learning in children in general and in children with DCD specifically. But this study demonstrated the importance of clinical decisionmaking to model and adapt MLSs to child, task and environment, with therapists' knowledge of MLSs being an important prerequisite. Research is needed to better understand the various learning mechanisms of children and how MLSs can be used to manipulate these mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CLINICIAN PERSPECTIVES ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF PEDIATRIC ASD THERAPIES: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Caven, Isabelle
    Penner, Melanie
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 61 (10): : S242 - S242
  • [32] OT Student Stress: A Mixed-Methods Study of Professor and Student Perspectives
    Fisher, Grace
    Grab, Jessica
    Long, Meghan
    Norris, Julianna
    Pilchik, Kristen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2021, 75
  • [33] Differing Professional Perspectives on the Interprofessional Collaboration in IPUs: A Mixed-methods Study
    Van Staalduinen, Dorine J.
    Van Den Bekerom, Petra E. A.
    Groeneveld, Sandra M.
    Franx, Arie
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Van Den Akker-Van Marle, M. Elske
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2023, 23 (03):
  • [34] Exploring Compliance: A Mixed-Methods Study of Contact Lens Wearer Perspectives
    Dumbleton, Kathryn A.
    Spafford, Marlee M.
    Sivak, Alisa
    Jones, Lyndon W.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2013, 90 (08) : 898 - 908
  • [35] Learning About Children With CCHCs and Their Health-Care Experiences: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Doucet, Shelley
    Nagel, Daniel A.
    Charlton, Pat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2018, 17 (01):
  • [36] Parents' perspectives on safety in neonatal intensive care: a mixed-methods study
    Lyndon, Audrey
    Jacobson, Carrie H.
    Fagan, Kelly M.
    Wisner, Kirsten
    Franck, Linda S.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (11) : 902 - 909
  • [37] Quality Reporting by Payers: A Mixed-Methods Study of Provider Perspectives and Practices
    Garabedian, Laura F.
    Sinaiko, Anna D.
    Ross-Degnan, Dennis
    Abu-Jaber, Tariq
    Hoefer, Martha
    Oddleifson, Stephanie
    Wagner, Anita K.
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 27 (03) : 157 - 164
  • [38] Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study
    Manze, Meredith
    Romero, Diana
    Kwan, Amy
    Ellsworth, Taylor Rose
    Jones, Heidi
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2023, 49 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [39] Provider perspectives on general practice in Henan, China: a mixed-methods study
    Zhu, Jiming
    Ariana, Proochista
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [40] Legal Relief for Children in Immigrant Families: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Wichelt, Natalie
    Torres, Kenny
    de la Vega, Gabriela
    Linton, Julie M.
    Montez, Kimberly
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)