Experts' perspectives on how to promote implicit and explicit motor learning in children: A mixed-methods study

被引:1
|
作者
van der Veer, Ingrid P. A. [1 ,5 ]
Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G. [2 ]
Rameckers, Eugene A. A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Klingels, Katrijn [1 ]
机构
[1] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr REVAL, Hasselt, Belgium
[2] Maastricht Univ, Res Sch CAPHRI, Dept Epidemiol Functioning Participat & Rehabilita, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Res Sch CAPHRI, Dept Rehabil Med Functioning Participat & Rehabili, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Adelante Rehabil Ctr, Ctr Expertise, Valkenburg, Netherlands
[5] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr REVAL, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
children; clinical decision making; explicit motor learning; feedback; implicit motor learning; instructions; mixed-methods study; DEVELOPMENTAL COORDINATION DISORDER; ATTENTION; FOCUS; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; THERAPY; SKILL;
D O I
10.1111/cch.13147
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundLittle is known about how motor learning strategies (MLSs) can promote implicit and explicit motor learning processes. This study aimed to explore experts' perspectives on therapists' use of MLSs to promote specific learning processes in children with and without developmental coordination disorder (DCD). MethodsIn this mixed-methods study, two consecutive digital questionnaires were used to ascertain the opinions of international experts. Questionnaire 2 explored the findings of Questionnaire 1 in greater depth. In order to reach a certain level of agreement about the classification of MLSs as promoting either (more) implicit or (more) explicit motor learning, 5-point Likert scales were used in addition to open-ended questions. The open-ended questions were analysed with a conventional analysis approach. Open coding was performed by two reviewers independently. Categories and themes were discussed within the research team, taking both questionnaires as one dataset. ResultsTwenty-nine experts from nine different countries with different backgrounds in research, education and/or clinical care completed the questionnaires. The results of the Likert scales showed large variation. Two themes emerged from the qualitative analyses: (1) Experts found it difficult to classify MLSs as promoting either implicit or explicit motor learning, and (2) experts stressed the need for clinical decisionmaking when choosing MLSs. ConclusionsInsufficient insight was gained into how MLSs could promote (more) implicit or (more) explicit motor learning in children in general and in children with DCD specifically. But this study demonstrated the importance of clinical decisionmaking to model and adapt MLSs to child, task and environment, with therapists' knowledge of MLSs being an important prerequisite. Research is needed to better understand the various learning mechanisms of children and how MLSs can be used to manipulate these mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Postdoctoral scholars’ perspectives about professional learning and development: a concurrent mixed-methods study
    Lorelli Nowell
    Glory Ovie
    Natasha Kenny
    Michele Jacobsen
    Palgrave Communications, 6
  • [12] Implicit and explicit motor learning: Application to children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
    Izadi-Najafabadi, Sara
    Mirzakhani-Araghi, Navid
    Miri-Lavasani, Negar
    Nejati, Vahid
    Pashazadeh-Azari, Zahra
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2015, 47 : 284 - 296
  • [13] Study of Explicit Knowledge Effects on Implicit Motor Learning in Older Adults
    Ehsani, F.
    Abdollahi, I
    Bandpei, Mohseni M. A.
    ARCHIVES OF REHABILITATION, 2012, 13 (02): : 56 - 63
  • [14] Perspectives of medicine, human biology, and nursing undergraduates on transversal skills learning: a mixed-methods study
    Fontana-Rosa, Nathalia Silva
    Paz, Luis Gonzalez-de
    Codina-Rodriguez, Ana C.
    Perez-Riart, Maria
    Carrio-Llach, Maria del Mar
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [15] RESIDENTS' PERSPECTIVES ON A DAILY GOALS CHECKLIST: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Centofanti, John
    Duan, Erick
    Hoad, Neala
    Waugh, Lily
    Perri, Dan
    Cook, Deborah
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (12) : U167 - U167
  • [16] Student perspectives on interdisciplinary learning in public health education: insights from a mixed-methods study
    Lim, Raymond Boon Tar
    Tan, Claire Gek Ling
    Voo, Kelly
    Lee, Yock Leng
    Teng, Cecilia Woon Chien
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [17] Recess and children with disabilities: A mixed-methods pilot study
    McNamara, Lauren
    Lakman, Yana
    Spadafora, Natalie
    Lodewyk, Ken
    Walker, Meaghan
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (04) : 637 - 643
  • [18] Parenting of Adolescent Single Children: A Mixed-methods Study
    Khadaroo, Ameerah
    MacCallum, Fiona
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 2021, 42 (12) : 2896 - 2919
  • [19] Do Experts Understand Performance Measures? A Mixed-Methods Study of Infection Preventionists
    Govindan, Sushant
    Wallace, Beth
    Iwashyna, Theodore J.
    Chopra, Vineet
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (01): : 71 - 76
  • [20] Learning and Programming Challenges of Rust: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Zhu, Shuofei
    Zhang, Ziyi
    Qin, Boqin
    Xiong, Aiping
    Song, Linhai
    2022 ACM/IEEE 44TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2022), 2022, : 1269 - 1281