Use of Impella Devices for Acute Cardiogenic Shock in the Perioperative Period of Cardiac Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Sicouri, Serge [1 ]
Shah, Vishal N. [2 ]
Buckley, Meghan [1 ]
Imperato, Nicholas [1 ]
McGee, Jacqueline [3 ]
Casanova, Elena
Gnall, Eric
Plestis, Konstadinos A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lankenau Inst Med Res, Wynnewood, PA 19096 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Lankenau Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Wynnewood, PA USA
关键词
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Shock; Cardiogenic; Heart Ventricles; Aortic Valve; Hemodynamics; Cardiac Surgical procedures; Perioperative Period; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; EARLY INITIATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0398
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Impella ventricular support system is a device that can be inserted percutaneously or directly across the aortic valve to unload the left ventricle. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of Impella devices in patients with acute cardiogenic shock in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. Methods: A retrospective single-surgeon review of 11 consecutive patients who underwent placement of Impella devices in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery was performed. Patient records were evaluated for demographics, indications for placement, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Impella devices were placed for refractory cardiogenic shock preoperatively in 6 patients, intraoperatively in 4 patients, and postoperatively as a rescue in 1 patient. Seven patients received Impella CP, 1 Impella RP, 1 Impella CP and RP, and 2 Impella 5.0. Additionally, 3 patients required preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), and 1 patient required intraoperative venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). All Impella devices were removed 1 to 28 days after implantation. Length of stay in the intensive care unit stay ranged from 2 to 53 days (average 23.9 +/- 14.6). The 30-day and 1-year mortality were 0%. Ten of 11 patients were alive at 2 years. Also, 1 patient died 18 months after surgery from complications of coronavirus disease (Covid-19). Device-related complications included varying degrees of hemolysis in 8 patients (73%) and device malfunction in 1 patient (9%). Conclusions: The Impella ventricular support system can be combined with other mechanical support devices for additional hemodynamic support. All patients demonstrated myocardial recovery with no deaths in the perioperative period and in 1-year of follow-up. Larger studies are necessary to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution
    Vasin, Sergey
    Philipp, Alois
    Floerchinger, Bernhard
    Rastogi, Priyank
    Lunz, Dirk
    Mueller, Thomas
    Schmid, Christof
    Camboni, Daniele
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 30 (05) : 711 - 714
  • [32] USE OF IMPELLA CP IN THE TREATMENT OF PERIPARTUM CARDIONIYOPATHY COMPLICATED BY CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Odak, Mihir
    Nightingale, Savannah
    Udongwo, Ndausung
    Douedi, Steven
    Tavakolian, Kameron
    Ilagan, Justin
    Elkherpitawy, Islam
    Costanzo, Eric J.
    CHEST, 2022, 162 (04) : 154A - 155A
  • [33] THE USE OF IMPELLA HEART PUMP FOR MANAGEMENT OF WOMEN WITH PERIPARTUM CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Elkayam, Uri
    Hall, Shelley
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Arany, Zoltan
    Grines, Cindy
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1015 - 1015
  • [34] Impella Use in Cardiogenic Shock: National Trends Using NIS 2016
    Wu, Fangcheng
    Krishnan, Anand M.
    Chakraborti, Abhishek
    Buda, Kevin
    Patel, Hardikkumar
    Jha, Anil
    Mahmoud, Omar
    Akhtar, Tauseef
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2019, 25 (08) : S69 - S70
  • [35] Use of Impella heart pump for management of women with peripartum cardiogenic shock
    Elkayam, Uri
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Hall, Shelley
    Arany, Zoltan
    Grines, Cindy
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (10) : 974 - 981
  • [36] Clinical Outcomes of Impella Microaxial Devices Used to Salvage Cardiogenic Shock as a Bridge to Durable Circulatory Support or Cardiac Transplantation
    Cheng, Richard
    Tank, Rikin
    Ramzy, Danny
    Azarbal, Babak
    Chung, Joshua
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Kobashigawa, Jon A.
    Moriguchi, Jaime D.
    Arabia, Francisco A.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (07) : 642 - 648
  • [37] THE USE OF IMPELLA IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Ng, Wei Lin
    Tan, Shien Ru
    Ling, Ryan Ruiyang
    Tan, Chuen Seng
    Mitra, Saikat
    Ramanathan, Kollengode
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 589 - 589
  • [38] Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock
    Nihici, Tamara
    Boardman, Henry M. P.
    Baig, Kamran
    Stafford, Jody L.
    Cernei, Cristina
    Bodger, Owen
    Westaby, Stephen
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (06):
  • [39] INDICATIONS AND OUTCOMES OF IMPELLA DEVICES FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK IN COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Srichawla, Bahadar
    Sekhon, Manraj
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [40] Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device
    Rohm, Charlene L.
    Gadidov, Bogdan
    Leitson, Michael
    Ray, Herman E.
    Prasad, Rajnish
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (04): : 499 - 504