Use of Impella Devices for Acute Cardiogenic Shock in the Perioperative Period of Cardiac Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Sicouri, Serge [1 ]
Shah, Vishal N. [2 ]
Buckley, Meghan [1 ]
Imperato, Nicholas [1 ]
McGee, Jacqueline [3 ]
Casanova, Elena
Gnall, Eric
Plestis, Konstadinos A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lankenau Inst Med Res, Wynnewood, PA 19096 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Lankenau Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Wynnewood, PA USA
关键词
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Shock; Cardiogenic; Heart Ventricles; Aortic Valve; Hemodynamics; Cardiac Surgical procedures; Perioperative Period; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; EARLY INITIATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0398
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Impella ventricular support system is a device that can be inserted percutaneously or directly across the aortic valve to unload the left ventricle. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of Impella devices in patients with acute cardiogenic shock in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. Methods: A retrospective single-surgeon review of 11 consecutive patients who underwent placement of Impella devices in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery was performed. Patient records were evaluated for demographics, indications for placement, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Impella devices were placed for refractory cardiogenic shock preoperatively in 6 patients, intraoperatively in 4 patients, and postoperatively as a rescue in 1 patient. Seven patients received Impella CP, 1 Impella RP, 1 Impella CP and RP, and 2 Impella 5.0. Additionally, 3 patients required preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), and 1 patient required intraoperative venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). All Impella devices were removed 1 to 28 days after implantation. Length of stay in the intensive care unit stay ranged from 2 to 53 days (average 23.9 +/- 14.6). The 30-day and 1-year mortality were 0%. Ten of 11 patients were alive at 2 years. Also, 1 patient died 18 months after surgery from complications of coronavirus disease (Covid-19). Device-related complications included varying degrees of hemolysis in 8 patients (73%) and device malfunction in 1 patient (9%). Conclusions: The Impella ventricular support system can be combined with other mechanical support devices for additional hemodynamic support. All patients demonstrated myocardial recovery with no deaths in the perioperative period and in 1-year of follow-up. Larger studies are necessary to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Impella and IABP Cardiac Support Systems in Patients with cardiogenic Shock
    Tanev, I.
    Dernick, G.
    Rauwolf, T.
    Schmeisser, A.
    Braun-Dullaeus, R.
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2023, 118 (05)
  • [22] Use of Impella cardiac axial flow pump for cardiogenic shock (A newer alternative)-How good is the evidence?
    Bhat, Rafiq Ahmed
    Ali, Syed Manzoor
    Hussenbocus, Yoosuf Ali Ashraf Muhammad
    Rathi, Akanksha
    Bhat, Javaid Akhter
    Khan, Abdul Aleem
    Maqbool, Syed
    Iqbal, Raja Saqib
    Islam, Md Monowarul
    Qu, Yongsheng
    Zhang, You
    Sun, Yuxiao
    Xiao, Wentao
    Tibrewal, Abhishek
    Gao, Chuanyu
    BIOCELL, 2022, 46 (05) : 1139 - 1150
  • [23] Treating Refractory Cardiogenic Shock With the TandemHeart and Impella Devices: A Single Center Experience
    Schwartz, Bryan G.
    Ludeman, Daniel J.
    Mayeda, Guy S.
    Kloner, Robert A.
    Economides, Christina
    Burstein, Steven
    CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 3 (02) : 54 - 66
  • [24] The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock
    Tarabichi, Saeed
    Ikegami, Hirohisa
    Russo, Mark J.
    Lee, Leonard Y.
    Lemaire, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [25] The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock
    Saeed Tarabichi
    Hirohisa Ikegami
    Mark J. Russo
    Leonard Y. Lee
    Anthony Lemaire
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 15
  • [26] The Impella Device for Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients in Cardiogenic Shock
    Lemaire, Anthony
    Anderson, Mark B.
    Lee, Leonard Y.
    Scholz, Peter
    Prendergast, Thomas
    Goodman, Andrew
    Lozano, Ann Marie
    Spotnitz, Alan
    Batsides, George
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (01): : 133 - 138
  • [27] Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Alushi, Brunilda
    Douedari, Andel
    Froehlig, Georg
    Knie, Wulf
    Wurster, Thomas H.
    Leistner, David M.
    Staehli, Barbara-Elisabeth
    Mochmann, Hans-Christian
    Pieske, Burkert
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Krackhardt, Florian
    Skurk, Carsten
    OPEN HEART, 2019, 6 (01):
  • [28] Impella to Treat Acute Myocardial Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    Kjaergaard, Jesper
    Terkelsen, Christian Juhl
    Hassager, Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [29] Trends in the Use of Cardiac Assist Devices in Heart Failure Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
    Lone, Ahmad Naeem
    Khan, Muhammad Zia
    Khan, Muhammad
    Khan, Safi
    Balla, Sudarshan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : S141 - S141
  • [30] Impella CP use in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock
    Maniuc, Octavian
    Salinger, Tim
    Anders, Fabian
    Muentze, Jonas
    Liu, Dan
    Hu, Kai
    Ertl, Georg
    Frantz, Stefan
    Nordbeck, Peter
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2019, 6 (04): : 863 - 866