Use of Impella Devices for Acute Cardiogenic Shock in the Perioperative Period of Cardiac Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Sicouri, Serge [1 ]
Shah, Vishal N. [2 ]
Buckley, Meghan [1 ]
Imperato, Nicholas [1 ]
McGee, Jacqueline [3 ]
Casanova, Elena
Gnall, Eric
Plestis, Konstadinos A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lankenau Inst Med Res, Wynnewood, PA 19096 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Lankenau Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Wynnewood, PA USA
关键词
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Shock; Cardiogenic; Heart Ventricles; Aortic Valve; Hemodynamics; Cardiac Surgical procedures; Perioperative Period; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; EARLY INITIATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0398
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Impella ventricular support system is a device that can be inserted percutaneously or directly across the aortic valve to unload the left ventricle. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of Impella devices in patients with acute cardiogenic shock in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. Methods: A retrospective single-surgeon review of 11 consecutive patients who underwent placement of Impella devices in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery was performed. Patient records were evaluated for demographics, indications for placement, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Impella devices were placed for refractory cardiogenic shock preoperatively in 6 patients, intraoperatively in 4 patients, and postoperatively as a rescue in 1 patient. Seven patients received Impella CP, 1 Impella RP, 1 Impella CP and RP, and 2 Impella 5.0. Additionally, 3 patients required preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), and 1 patient required intraoperative venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). All Impella devices were removed 1 to 28 days after implantation. Length of stay in the intensive care unit stay ranged from 2 to 53 days (average 23.9 +/- 14.6). The 30-day and 1-year mortality were 0%. Ten of 11 patients were alive at 2 years. Also, 1 patient died 18 months after surgery from complications of coronavirus disease (Covid-19). Device-related complications included varying degrees of hemolysis in 8 patients (73%) and device malfunction in 1 patient (9%). Conclusions: The Impella ventricular support system can be combined with other mechanical support devices for additional hemodynamic support. All patients demonstrated myocardial recovery with no deaths in the perioperative period and in 1-year of follow-up. Larger studies are necessary to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Overview of Impella and mechanical devices in cardiogenic shock
    Chera, Hymie Habib
    Nagar, Menachem
    Chang, Nai-Lun
    Morales-Mangual, Carlos
    Dous, George
    Marmur, Jonathan D.
    Ihsan, Muhammad
    Madaj, Paul
    Rosen, Yitzhak
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2018, 15 (04) : 293 - 299
  • [3] Use of Impella® in Cardiogenic Shock without Benefits
    Franke, Katharina
    AKTUELLE KARDIOLOGIE, 2019, 8 (03) : 187 - +
  • [4] Left ventricular support with the Impella® LP 5.0 for cardiogenic shock following cardiac surgery
    Rossiter-Thornton, Michael
    Arun, Viswanath
    Forrest, A. Paul
    Bayfield, Matthew S.
    Wilson, Michael K.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2008, 17 (03): : 243 - 245
  • [5] Successful use of Impella CP® in cardiogenic shock after cardiac arrest: a first in Poland
    Nadziakiewicz, Pawel
    Zembala, Michal
    Slonka, Grzegorz
    Balak, Wojciech
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 75 (08) : 812 - 812
  • [6] IMPELLA SUPPORT FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK SECONDARY TO ACUTE MYOCARDITIS
    Charalambous, Marinos
    Meraj, Perwaiz
    Jauhar, Rajiv
    Donnelly, Joseph
    Mignatti, Andrea
    Singh, Avneet
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 815 - 815
  • [7] Comparative Clinical Outcomes with the Initial Use of Impella CP versus Impella 5.0 Devices in Patients with Severe Cardiogenic Shock
    Tank, Rikin
    Cheng, Richard
    Ramzy, Danny
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Kobashigawa, Jon
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Arabia, Francisco
    Azarbal, Babak
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B227 - B228
  • [8] Comparison of Inotropes for Use With the Impella Device in Cardiogenic Shock
    Sulejmani, Essilvo
    Wayne, Nathaniel
    Provost, Laura
    Chase, Aaron
    Newsome, Andrea Sikora
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 17
  • [9] Impella use in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: Analysis of 10 years registry data
    Davidsen, Cedric
    Packer, Erik J. S.
    Loland, Kjetil H.
    Rotevatn, Svein
    Nygreen, Else L.
    Eriksen, Erlend
    Oksnes, Anja
    Herstad, Jon
    Haaverstad, Rune
    Bleie, Oyvind
    Tuseth, Vegard
    RESUSCITATION, 2019, 140 : 178 - 184
  • [10] The Use of the Impella Device in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock
    Lemaire, A.
    Batsides, G.
    Prendergast, T.
    Scholz, P.
    Spotnitz, A.
    Lozano, A. M.
    Lee, L. Y.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S283 - S283