Impact of active placebo controls on estimated drug effects in randomised trials: a systematic review of trials with both active placebo and standard placebo

被引:2
|
作者
Laursen, David R. T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nejstgaard, Camilla Hansen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bjorkedal, Espen [4 ]
Frost, Anders Dreyer [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Morten Rix [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Paludan-Muller, Asger S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Prosenz, Julian [8 ]
Werner, Christoph Patrick [9 ]
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Evidence Based Med Odense CEBMO, Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Cochrane Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Open Patient Data Explorat Network OPEN, Odense, Denmark
[4] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Psychol, Tromso, Norway
[5] Novo Nordisk, Soborg, Denmark
[6] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem & Pharmacol, Odense, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Clin Pharmacol Pharm & Environm Med, Odense, Denmark
[8] Univ Hosp St Poelten, Dept Internal Med 2, St Polten, Austria
[9] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Fac Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
6 PHENOTHIAZINE COMPOUNDS; ACUTELY ILL PATIENTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; INERT PLACEBO; EFFECT SIZE; BLIND; PAIN; ATROPINE; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; TRANQUILIZERS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.MR000055.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background An estimated 60% of pharmacological randomised trials use placebo control interventions to blind (i.e. mask) participants. However, standard placebos do not control for perceptible non-therapeutic effects (i.e. side effects) of the experimental drug, which may unblind participants. Trials rarely use active placebo controls, which contain pharmacological compounds designed to mimic the non-therapeutic experimental drug effects in order to reduce the risk of unblinding. A relevant improvement in the estimated effects of active placebo compared with standard placebo would imply that trials with standard placebo may overestimate experimental drug effects. Objectives We aimed to estimate the difference in drug effects when an experimental drug is compared with an active placebo versus a standard placebo control intervention, and to explore causes for heterogeneity. In the context of a randomised trial, this difference in drug effects can be estimated by directly comparing the effect difference between the active placebo and standard placebo intervention. Search methods searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, two other databases, and two trial registries up to October 2020. We also searched reference lists and citations and contacted trial authors. Selection criteria We included randomised trials that compared an active placebo versus a standard placebo intervention. We considered trials both with and without a matching experimental drug arm. We included 21 trials in this review, covering subjects such as pain and psychiatry. We found no clear difference between the two types of placebo in participant-reported outcomes (such as pain intensity). However, because the result was uncertain, the possible range of this result included both no difference and a potentially important difference in favour of active placebo. When we limited our analysis to higher-quality trials, active placebos were more beneficial than standard placebos, but these trials were not typical clinical trials and might not be applicable to clinical scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:96
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomised Controlled Trials May Underestimate Drug Effects: Balanced Placebo Trial Design
    Lund, Karen
    Vase, Lene
    Petersen, Gitte L.
    Jensen, Troels S.
    Finnerup, Nanna B.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [42] Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment
    Hrobjartsson, A
    Gotzsche, PC
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 256 (02) : 91 - 100
  • [43] Influence of active versus placebo control on treatment responses in randomised controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis
    Kerschbaumer, Andreas
    Stimakovits, Nina Maria
    Smolen, Josef S.
    Stefanova, Tijen
    Chwala, Eva
    Aletaha, Daniel
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 (04) : 476 - 482
  • [44] Author Reply to "Placebo Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery" and "Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials"
    Sochacki, Kyle R.
    Dong, David
    Harris, Joshua D.
    Mather, Richard C.
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Nho, Shane J.
    Cote, Mark P.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (11): : 2779 - 2784
  • [45] Adverse events of active and placebo groups in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine randomized trials: A systematic review
    Amanzio, Martina
    Mitsikostas, Dimos D.
    Giovannelli, Fabio
    Bartoli, Massimo
    Cipriani, Giuseppina Elena
    Brown, Walter A.
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2022, 12
  • [46] MULTIPLE COMPARISONS IN OVER-THE-COUNTER DRUG CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH BOTH POSITIVE AND PLACEBO CONTROLS
    DAGOSTINO, RB
    HEEREN, TC
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [47] Review: higher rates of attrition in antipsychotic treatment arms of placebo controlled trials than in trials with active comparators
    Kemmler, G.
    Hummer, M.
    Widschwendter, C.
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2006, 9 (03) : 70 - 70
  • [48] THE LIKELIHOOD OF RECEIVING THE DRUG OR PLACEBO DETERMINES THE SIZE OF THE DRUG OR PLACEBO RESPONSE IN IBS TRIALS
    Enck, Paul
    Vase, Lene
    Klosterhalfen, Sibylle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 17 : 58 - 59
  • [49] Placebo effect sizes in homeopathic compared to conventional drugs - a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Nuhn, Tobias
    Luedtke, Rainer
    Geraedts, Max
    HOMEOPATHY, 2010, 99 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [50] Quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing antibiotic with placebo for acute cough in adults
    Fahey, T
    Stocks, N
    Thomas, T
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7135): : 906 - 910