Impact of active placebo controls on estimated drug effects in randomised trials: a systematic review of trials with both active placebo and standard placebo

被引:2
|
作者
Laursen, David R. T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nejstgaard, Camilla Hansen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bjorkedal, Espen [4 ]
Frost, Anders Dreyer [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Morten Rix [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Paludan-Muller, Asger S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Prosenz, Julian [8 ]
Werner, Christoph Patrick [9 ]
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Evidence Based Med Odense CEBMO, Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Cochrane Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Open Patient Data Explorat Network OPEN, Odense, Denmark
[4] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Psychol, Tromso, Norway
[5] Novo Nordisk, Soborg, Denmark
[6] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem & Pharmacol, Odense, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Clin Pharmacol Pharm & Environm Med, Odense, Denmark
[8] Univ Hosp St Poelten, Dept Internal Med 2, St Polten, Austria
[9] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Fac Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
6 PHENOTHIAZINE COMPOUNDS; ACUTELY ILL PATIENTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; INERT PLACEBO; EFFECT SIZE; BLIND; PAIN; ATROPINE; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; TRANQUILIZERS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.MR000055.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background An estimated 60% of pharmacological randomised trials use placebo control interventions to blind (i.e. mask) participants. However, standard placebos do not control for perceptible non-therapeutic effects (i.e. side effects) of the experimental drug, which may unblind participants. Trials rarely use active placebo controls, which contain pharmacological compounds designed to mimic the non-therapeutic experimental drug effects in order to reduce the risk of unblinding. A relevant improvement in the estimated effects of active placebo compared with standard placebo would imply that trials with standard placebo may overestimate experimental drug effects. Objectives We aimed to estimate the difference in drug effects when an experimental drug is compared with an active placebo versus a standard placebo control intervention, and to explore causes for heterogeneity. In the context of a randomised trial, this difference in drug effects can be estimated by directly comparing the effect difference between the active placebo and standard placebo intervention. Search methods searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, two other databases, and two trial registries up to October 2020. We also searched reference lists and citations and contacted trial authors. Selection criteria We included randomised trials that compared an active placebo versus a standard placebo intervention. We considered trials both with and without a matching experimental drug arm. We included 21 trials in this review, covering subjects such as pain and psychiatry. We found no clear difference between the two types of placebo in participant-reported outcomes (such as pain intensity). However, because the result was uncertain, the possible range of this result included both no difference and a potentially important difference in favour of active placebo. When we limited our analysis to higher-quality trials, active placebos were more beneficial than standard placebos, but these trials were not typical clinical trials and might not be applicable to clinical scenarios.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:96
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Duloxetine versus ‘active’ placebo, placebo or no intervention for major depressive disorder; a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Faiza Siddiqui
    Marija Barbateskovic
    Sophie Juul
    Kiran Kumar Katakam
    Klaus Munkholm
    Christian Gluud
    Janus Christian Jakobsen
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [22] Duloxetine versus 'active' placebo, placebo or no intervention for major depressive disorder; a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Siddiqui, Faiza
    Barbateskovic, Marija
    Juul, Sophie
    Katakam, Kiran Kumar
    Munkholm, Klaus
    Gluud, Christian
    Jakobsen, Janus Christian
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [23] Placebo controls in randomized trials of acupuncture
    Vickers, AJ
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (04) : 421 - 435
  • [24] PLACEBO EFFECTS ON ITCH: A REVIEW OF CLINICAL TRIALS
    van Laarhoven, Antoinette I. M.
    van der Sman-Mauriks, Ineke M.
    van de Kerkhof, Peter C. M.
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2013, 93 (05) : 617 - 617
  • [25] Power considerations for trials of two experimental arms versus a standard active control or placebo
    Hasselblad, Vic
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (05) : 1824 - 1835
  • [26] Placebo effects in clinical trials
    Weihrauch, TR
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 1999, 94 (03) : 173 - 181
  • [27] Placebo effects in clinical trials
    Weihrauch, TR
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 2000, 95 : 23 - 30
  • [28] Placebo effects in oral triptan trials: the scientific and ethical rationale for continued use of placebo controls
    Loder, E
    Goldstein, R
    Biondi, D
    CEPHALALGIA, 2005, 25 (02) : 124 - 131
  • [29] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of lisdexamfetamine versus placebo in the treatment of adults with ADHD
    Maneeton, N.
    Maneeton, B.
    Suttajit, S.
    Reungyos, J.
    Srisurapanont, M.
    Martin, S. D.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 : S208 - S208
  • [30] Statistical methods for comparison to placebo in active-control trials
    Hasselblad, V
    Kong, DF
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2001, 35 (02): : 435 - 449