DETERMINISTIC NEAR-OPTIMAL APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS FOR DYNAMIC SET COVER

被引:0
|
作者
Bhattacharya, Sayan [1 ]
Henzinger, Monika [2 ]
Nanongkai, Danupon [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Xiaowei [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[2] Inst Sci & Technol Austria ISTA, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] Max Planck Inst Informat, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[4] Saarland Univ, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[5] Univ Macau, Macau, Peoples R China
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会; 奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
set cover; approximation algorithms; dynamic data structure; SHORTEST PATHS; BREAKING; BARRIER;
D O I
10.1137/21M1428649
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In the dynamic minimum set cover problem, the challenge is to minimize the update time while guaranteeing a close-to-optimal min{O(log n), f\} approximation factor. (Throughout, n, m, f, and C are parameters denoting the maximum number of elements, the number of sets, the frequency, and the cost range.) In the high-frequency range, when f = \Omega (log n), this was achieved by a deterministic O(log n)-approximation algorithm with O(f log n) amortized update time by Gupta et al. [Online and dynamic algorithms for set cover, in Proceedings STOC 2017, ACM, pp. 537550]. In this paper we consider the low-frequency range, when f = O(log n), and obtain deterministic algorithms with a (1 + \epsilon )f-approximation ratio and the following guarantees on the update time. (1) O ((f /\epsilon ) \cdot log(Cn)) amortized update time: Prior to our work, the best approximation ratio guaranteed by deterministic algorithms was O(f2) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Italiano [Design of dynamic algorithms via primal-dual method, in Proceedings ICALP 2015, Springer, pp. 206--218]. In contrast, the only result with O(f)-approximation was that of Abboud et al. [Dynamic set cover: Improved algorithms and lower bounds, in Proceedings STOC 2019, ACM, pp. 114--125], who designed a randomized (1 + \epsilon )f-approximation algorithm with O((f2/\epsilon ) \cdot log n) amortized update time. (2) O \bigl(f2/\epsilon3 + (f/\epsilon2) \cdot log C\bigr) amortized update time: This result improves the above update time bound for most values off in the low-frequency range, i.e., f = o(log n). It is also the first result that is independent of m and n. It subsumes the constant amortized update time of Bhattacharya and Kulkarni [Deterministically maintaining a (2 + \epsilon )-approximate minimum vertex cover in O(1/\epsilon2) amortized update time, in Proceedings SODA 2019, SIAM, pp. 1872--1885] for unweighted dynamic vertex cover (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1). (3) O((f/\epsilon3) \cdot log2(Cn)) worst-case update time: No nontrivial worst-case update time was previously known for the dynamic set cover problem. Our bound subsumes and improves by a logarithmic factor the O(log3 n/poly(\epsilon )) worst-case update time for the unweighted dynamic vertex cover problem (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Nanongkai [Fully dynamic approximate maximum matching and minimum vertex cover in O(log3)n worst case update time, in Proceedings SODA 2017, SIAM, pp. 470--489]. We achieve our results via the primal-dual approach, by maintaining a fractional packing solution as a dual certificate. Prior work in dynamic algorithms that employs the primal-dual approach uses a local update scheme that maintains relaxed complementary slackness conditions for every set. For our first result we use instead a global update scheme that does not always maintain complementary slackness conditions. For our second result we combine the global and the local update schema. To achieve our third result we use a hierarchy of background schedulers. It is an interesting open question whether this background scheduler technique can also be used to transform algorithms with amortized running time bounds into algorithms with worst-case running time bounds.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1192
页数:61
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Near-Optimal Deterministic Distributed Synchronizer
    Ghaffari, Mohsen
    Trygub, Anton
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, PODC 2023, 2023, : 180 - 189
  • [2] Near-Optimal Deterministic Attitude Filtering
    Zamani, Mohammad
    Trumpf, Jochen
    Mahony, Robert
    49TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2010, : 6511 - 6516
  • [3] THE NEAR-OPTIMAL INSTRUCTION SET
    SMITH, T
    IEEE MICRO, 1982, 2 (03) : 5 - 6
  • [4] Near-optimal deterministic algorithms for volume computation via M-ellipsoids
    Dadush, Daniel
    Vempala, Santosh S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (48) : 19237 - 19245
  • [5] Online Markov Decoding: Lower Bounds and Near-Optimal Approximation Algorithms
    Garg, Vikas K.
    Pichkhadze, Tamar
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 32 (NIPS 2019), 2019, 32
  • [6] On Submodular Set Cover Problems for Near-Optimal Online Kernel Basis Selection
    Pradhan, Hrusikesha
    Koppel, Alec
    Rajawat, Ketan
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2022, : 4168 - 4172
  • [7] Deterministic near-optimal controls with state constraints
    Chen, X
    Zhou, XY
    DYNAMICS OF CONTINUOUS DISCRETE AND IMPULSIVE SYSTEMS, 1998, 4 (04): : 513 - 526
  • [8] Near-Optimal Deterministic Filtering on the Unit Circle
    Coote, Paul
    Trumpf, Jochen
    Mahony, Robert
    Willems, Jan C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2009 HELD JOINTLY WITH THE 2009 28TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC/CCC 2009), 2009, : 5490 - 5495
  • [9] Near-Optimal Deterministic Filtering on the Rotation Group
    Zamani, Mohammad
    Trumpf, Jochen
    Mahony, Robert
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2011, 56 (06) : 1411 - 1414
  • [10] Deterministic near-optimal distributed listing of cliques
    Censor-Hillel, Keren
    Leitersdorf, Dean
    Vulakh, David
    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2024, : 363 - 385