DETERMINISTIC NEAR-OPTIMAL APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS FOR DYNAMIC SET COVER

被引:0
|
作者
Bhattacharya, Sayan [1 ]
Henzinger, Monika [2 ]
Nanongkai, Danupon [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Xiaowei [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[2] Inst Sci & Technol Austria ISTA, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] Max Planck Inst Informat, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[4] Saarland Univ, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[5] Univ Macau, Macau, Peoples R China
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会; 奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
set cover; approximation algorithms; dynamic data structure; SHORTEST PATHS; BREAKING; BARRIER;
D O I
10.1137/21M1428649
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In the dynamic minimum set cover problem, the challenge is to minimize the update time while guaranteeing a close-to-optimal min{O(log n), f\} approximation factor. (Throughout, n, m, f, and C are parameters denoting the maximum number of elements, the number of sets, the frequency, and the cost range.) In the high-frequency range, when f = \Omega (log n), this was achieved by a deterministic O(log n)-approximation algorithm with O(f log n) amortized update time by Gupta et al. [Online and dynamic algorithms for set cover, in Proceedings STOC 2017, ACM, pp. 537550]. In this paper we consider the low-frequency range, when f = O(log n), and obtain deterministic algorithms with a (1 + \epsilon )f-approximation ratio and the following guarantees on the update time. (1) O ((f /\epsilon ) \cdot log(Cn)) amortized update time: Prior to our work, the best approximation ratio guaranteed by deterministic algorithms was O(f2) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Italiano [Design of dynamic algorithms via primal-dual method, in Proceedings ICALP 2015, Springer, pp. 206--218]. In contrast, the only result with O(f)-approximation was that of Abboud et al. [Dynamic set cover: Improved algorithms and lower bounds, in Proceedings STOC 2019, ACM, pp. 114--125], who designed a randomized (1 + \epsilon )f-approximation algorithm with O((f2/\epsilon ) \cdot log n) amortized update time. (2) O \bigl(f2/\epsilon3 + (f/\epsilon2) \cdot log C\bigr) amortized update time: This result improves the above update time bound for most values off in the low-frequency range, i.e., f = o(log n). It is also the first result that is independent of m and n. It subsumes the constant amortized update time of Bhattacharya and Kulkarni [Deterministically maintaining a (2 + \epsilon )-approximate minimum vertex cover in O(1/\epsilon2) amortized update time, in Proceedings SODA 2019, SIAM, pp. 1872--1885] for unweighted dynamic vertex cover (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1). (3) O((f/\epsilon3) \cdot log2(Cn)) worst-case update time: No nontrivial worst-case update time was previously known for the dynamic set cover problem. Our bound subsumes and improves by a logarithmic factor the O(log3 n/poly(\epsilon )) worst-case update time for the unweighted dynamic vertex cover problem (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Nanongkai [Fully dynamic approximate maximum matching and minimum vertex cover in O(log3)n worst case update time, in Proceedings SODA 2017, SIAM, pp. 470--489]. We achieve our results via the primal-dual approach, by maintaining a fractional packing solution as a dual certificate. Prior work in dynamic algorithms that employs the primal-dual approach uses a local update scheme that maintains relaxed complementary slackness conditions for every set. For our first result we use instead a global update scheme that does not always maintain complementary slackness conditions. For our second result we combine the global and the local update schema. To achieve our third result we use a hierarchy of background schedulers. It is an interesting open question whether this background scheduler technique can also be used to transform algorithms with amortized running time bounds into algorithms with worst-case running time bounds.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1192
页数:61
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deterministic near-optimal controls. Part II: dynamic programming and viscosity solution approach
    Dept. of Syst. Eng. and Eng. Mgmt., Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
    Math Oper Res, 3 (655-674):
  • [32] Optimal and Near-Optimal Partner Selection Algorithms in Cooperative OFDMA
    Baksi, Saygin
    Kaya, Onur
    Biyikoglu, Turker
    2012 IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE (WCNC), 2012,
  • [33] Online and Dynamic Algorithms for Set Cover
    Gupta, Anupam
    Krishnaswamy, Ravishankar
    Kumar, Amit
    Panigrahi, Debmalya
    STOC'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ANNUAL ACM SIGACT SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2017, : 537 - 550
  • [34] Optimal and Near-Optimal Resource Allocation Algorithms for OFDMA Networks
    Lin, Yuan-Bin
    Chiu, Tai-Hsiang
    Su, Yu T.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 8 (08) : 4066 - 4077
  • [35] Optimal and near-optimal algorithms for k-item broadcast
    Santos, EE
    JOURNAL OF PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 1999, 57 (02) : 121 - 139
  • [36] Near-optimal hardness results and approximation algorithms for edge-disjoint paths and related problems
    Guruswami, V
    Khanna, S
    Rajaraman, R
    Shepherd, B
    Yannakakis, M
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2003, 67 (03) : 473 - 496
  • [37] Near-optimal hardness results and approximation algorithms for edge-disjoint paths and related problems
    Guruswami, Venkatesan
    Khanna, Sanjeev
    Rajaraman, Rajmohan
    Shepherd, Bruce
    Yannakakis, Mihalis
    Conference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1999, : 19 - 28
  • [38] Near-Optimal Deterministic Steiner Tree Maintenance in Sensor Networks
    Sharma, Gokarna
    Busch, Costas
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING IN SENSOR SYSTEMS (IEEE DCOSS 2014), 2014, : 201 - 208
  • [39] Rapid near-optimal VQ design with a deterministic data net
    Effros, M
    Schulman, LJ
    2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 298 - 298
  • [40] Near-Optimal Deterministic Vertex-Failure Connectivity Oracles
    Long, Yaowei
    Saranurak, Thatchaphol
    2022 IEEE 63RD ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS), 2022, : 1002 - 1010