A decision-making framework for blockchain platform evaluation in spherical fuzzy environment

被引:20
|
作者
Bonab, Shabnam Rahnamay [1 ]
Yousefi, Samuel [2 ]
Tosarkani, Babak Mohamadpour [2 ]
Ghoushchi, Saeid Jafarzadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Technol, Fac Ind Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
关键词
Blockchain platform selection; Multi-criteria decision-making; Best-worst method; MARCOS; Spherical fuzzy set;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120833
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Blockchain systems with critical features (e.g., security, flexibility against attacks, and data traceability) have created possibilities for users to develop innovative economic and business models. Despite the abundance and variety of features of blockchain technology, choosing a suitable and reliable blockchain platform is somewhat challenging. Several criteria, including profitability, sustainability, and popularity, should be considered to identify such platforms. Accordingly, this study investigates the blockchain platform evaluation and selection as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In this regard, we propose an integrated approach based on the extended version of MCDM methods in a spherical fuzzy environment. In the developed approach, the main criteria are weighted using the developed spherical fuzzy best-worst method (SF-BWM) to reduce uncertainty in pairwise comparisons. Then, the 15 blockchain platforms are analyzed and ranked using spherical fuzzy measurement of alternatives and ranking according to the compromise solution (SF-MARCOS). The outputs of the SFBWM-MARCOS approach imply that Bitcoin and Ethereum are placed in the first and second priorities, respectively. The comparison of the results with other MCDM methods and sensitivity analysis demonstrates the performance of the proposed approach and its ranking stability in various scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A three-echelon based sustainable supply chain scheduling decision-making framework under the blockchain environment
    Zeng, Ming
    Sadeghzadeh, Keivan
    Xiong, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (14) : 4951 - 4971
  • [42] An Approach of Decision-Making under the Framework of Fermatean Fuzzy Sets
    Sindhu, Muhammad Sarwar
    Siddique, Imran
    Ahsan, Muhammad
    Jarad, Fahd
    Altunok, Taner
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [43] Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the heterogeneous group decision-making environment
    Chen, SJ
    Chen, SM
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2005, 36 (03) : 309 - 338
  • [44] MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN A FUZZY ENVIRONMENT WITH APPLICATIONS TO HELICOPTER DESIGN
    DHINGRA, AK
    RAO, SS
    MIURA, H
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1990, 28 (04) : 703 - 710
  • [45] Extension of the VIKOR for decision-making problems under fuzzy environment
    Wang Yongchun
    GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGE AND MANAGEMENT TRANSFORMATION, VOLS I - III, 2007, : 437 - 442
  • [46] Handling decision-making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy environment: PyIFDM package
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
    Salabun, Wojciech
    SOFTWAREX, 2023, 22
  • [47] DECISION-MAKING IN SUCCESSIVE STAGES IN FUZZY ENVIRONMENT - COMPLETE RESOLUTION
    JOLLES, E
    REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 1976, 86 (03): : 416 - 436
  • [48] Extension of the GRA for group decision-making under fuzzy - Environment
    Wei, Guiwu
    Wei, Yu
    Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 1624 - 1631
  • [49] Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
    Chen, CT
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [50] Decision-making in the fuzzy environment on the basis of various compromise schemes
    Orazbayev, Batyr
    Ospanov, Erbol
    Kissikova, Nurgul
    Mukataev, Nurlan
    Orazbayeva, Kulman
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND APPLICATION OF SOFT COMPUTING, COMPUTING WITH WORDS AND PERCEPTION, ICSCCW 2017, 2017, 120 : 945 - 952