A decision-making framework for blockchain platform evaluation in spherical fuzzy environment

被引:20
|
作者
Bonab, Shabnam Rahnamay [1 ]
Yousefi, Samuel [2 ]
Tosarkani, Babak Mohamadpour [2 ]
Ghoushchi, Saeid Jafarzadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Technol, Fac Ind Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
关键词
Blockchain platform selection; Multi-criteria decision-making; Best-worst method; MARCOS; Spherical fuzzy set;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120833
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Blockchain systems with critical features (e.g., security, flexibility against attacks, and data traceability) have created possibilities for users to develop innovative economic and business models. Despite the abundance and variety of features of blockchain technology, choosing a suitable and reliable blockchain platform is somewhat challenging. Several criteria, including profitability, sustainability, and popularity, should be considered to identify such platforms. Accordingly, this study investigates the blockchain platform evaluation and selection as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In this regard, we propose an integrated approach based on the extended version of MCDM methods in a spherical fuzzy environment. In the developed approach, the main criteria are weighted using the developed spherical fuzzy best-worst method (SF-BWM) to reduce uncertainty in pairwise comparisons. Then, the 15 blockchain platforms are analyzed and ranked using spherical fuzzy measurement of alternatives and ranking according to the compromise solution (SF-MARCOS). The outputs of the SFBWM-MARCOS approach imply that Bitcoin and Ethereum are placed in the first and second priorities, respectively. The comparison of the results with other MCDM methods and sensitivity analysis demonstrates the performance of the proposed approach and its ranking stability in various scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fuzzy control decision-making framework adapted to the uncertainty environment of complex software system
    He, Jingjing
    Zheng, Liwei
    Cui, Zhanqi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODELING SIMULATION AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [22] Complex Spherical Dombi Fuzzy Aggregation Operators for Decision-Making
    Akram, Muhammad
    Khan, Ayesha
    Karaaslan, Faruk
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 37 (5-6) : 503 - 531
  • [23] A fuzzy framework for encoding uncertainty in clinical decision-making
    Minutolo, Aniello
    Esposito, Massimo
    De Pietro, Giuseppe
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2016, 98 : 95 - 116
  • [24] Refinements of the maximin approach to decision-making in a fuzzy environment
    Dubois, D
    Fargier, H
    Prade, H
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 81 (01) : 103 - 122
  • [25] Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the group decision-making environment
    Chen, SM
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 29 (04) : 363 - 376
  • [26] Decision-making in fuzzy environment: A survey from stochastic decision process
    Iwamoto, S
    1998 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, KES '98, PROCEEDINGS, VOL, 3, 1998, : 542 - 546
  • [27] DECISION-MAKING AUTOMATION FUZZY DECISION-MAKING IN INDUSTRY
    Soulhi, Aziz
    Guedira, Said
    El Alami, Nour-eddine
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DATA BASES, 2009, : 181 - +
  • [28] Streamlining apartment provider evaluation: A spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model
    Nguyen, Phi -Hung
    Tran, Thu-Hien
    Nguyen, Lan-Anh Thi
    Pham, Hong-Anh
    Pham, Mai-Anh Thi
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [29] A Multiattribute Decision-Making Framework: VIKOR Method with Complex Spherical Fuzzy N-Soft Sets
    Akram, Muhammad
    Shabir, Maria
    Adeel, Arooj
    Al-Kenani, Ahmad N.
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [30] Evaluation of green lean production in textile industry: a hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework
    Shadi Vahabi Nejat
    Soroush Avakh Darestani
    Manouchehr Omidvari
    Mohammad Amin Adibi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 11590 - 11611