The effects of an online decision aid to support the reproductive decision-making process of genetically at risk couples-A pilot study

被引:3
|
作者
Severijns, Yil [1 ,2 ]
Heijmans, Maartje W. F. [1 ]
de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M. [2 ,3 ]
Bijlsma, Emilia K. [4 ]
Corsten-Janssen, Nicole [5 ]
Joosten, Sara J. R. [6 ]
van Kuijk, Sander M. J. [7 ]
Lichtenbelt, Klaske D. [8 ]
Ottenheim, Cecile P. E. [9 ]
Stuurman, Kyra E. [10 ]
Tan-Sindhunata, Gita M. B. [9 ]
de Vries, Hein [1 ]
van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Promot CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sch Oncol & Reprod, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen Groningen, Dept Genet, Groningen, Netherlands
[6] Radboudumc Nijmegen, Dept Clin Genet, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment, Maastricht, Netherlands
[8] Utrecht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Genet, Utrecht, Netherlands
[9] Amsterdam UMC, Dept Human Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[10] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Clin Genet, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
(joint informed) decision-making; decision aid; decisional conflict; genetic counseling; preimplantation genetic testing (PGT); reproductive genetics; HEREDITARY BREAST; PREGNANT-WOMEN; DIAGNOSIS; INFORMATION; VALIDATION; PARTNERS; OPTIONS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1631
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring may experience doubts about their reproductive options. This study examines the effects of an online decision aid (DA) on the (joint) reproductive decision-making process of couples (not pregnant at time of inclusion) at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring. The primary outcome is decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes are knowledge, realistic expectations, deliberation, joint informed decision-making, and decisional self-efficacy. These outcomes were measured with a pretest-posttest design: before use (T0), after use (T1), and 2 weeks after use (T2) of the decision aid (DA). Usability of the DA was assessed at T1. Paired sample t-tests were used to compute differences between baseline and subsequent measurements. The comparisons of T0-T1 and T0-T2 indicate a significant reduction in mean decisional conflict scores with stronger effects for participants with high baseline decisional conflict scores. Furthermore, use of the DA led to increased knowledge, improved realistic expectations, and increased levels of deliberation, with higher increase in participants with low baseline scores. Decision self-efficacy only improved for participants with lower baseline scores. Participants indicated that the information in the DA was comprehensible and clearly organized. These first results indicate that this online DA is an appropriate tool to support couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease and a desire to have (a) child(ren) in their reproductive decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 165
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] USE OF COMPUTER AS AN AID TO MANAGEMENT IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    PYLE, RE
    AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1967, 46 (04): : 353 - &
  • [22] Shared Decision-Making: Process for Design and Implementation of a Decision Aid for Patients With Craniosynostosis
    Said, Abdullah M.
    Zubovic, Ema
    Pfeifauf, Kristin D.
    Skolnick, Gary B.
    Agboada, Jude
    Acayo-Laker, Penina
    Naidoo, Sybill D.
    Politi, Mary C.
    Smyth, Matthew
    Patel, Kamlesh B.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2024, 61 (01): : 138 - 143
  • [23] Collaborative IS decision-making: Analyzing decision process characteristics and technology support
    Munkvold, BE
    Eim, K
    Husby, O
    GROUPWARE: DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND USE, 2005, 3706 : 292 - 307
  • [24] NeuroIS to Improve the FITradeoff Decision-Making Process and Decision Support System
    de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
    Peixoto Roselli, Lucia Reis
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROIS RETREAT 2020, 2020, 43 : 111 - 120
  • [25] Do online social networks support decision-making?
    Sadovykh, Valeria
    Sundaram, David
    Piramuthu, Selwyn
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2015, 70 : 15 - 30
  • [26] A Model to Support Risk Management Decision-Making
    Tchangani, Ayeley P.
    STUDIES IN INFORMATICS AND CONTROL, 2011, 20 (03): : 209 - 220
  • [27] Reproductive decision-making among HIV-positive couples in Taiwan
    Ko, NY
    Muecke, M
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2005, 37 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [29] Nurse Leaders Decision-Making to Adopt an Online Innovation: A Decision Support Tool
    Lose, Daniel T.
    NURSE LEADER, 2019, 17 (06) : 509 - 515
  • [30] Decision Deck's VIP Analysis to Support Online Collaborative Decision-Making
    Climaco, Joao N.
    Costa, Joao A.
    Dias, Luis C.
    Melo, Paulo
    COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING: PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES, 2008, 176 : 459 - 466