Use of 3D-printed polylactic acid/bioceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in preclinical in vivo studies: A systematic review

被引:37
|
作者
Alonso-Fernandez, Ivan [1 ,3 ]
Haugen, Havard Jostein [2 ]
Lopez-Pena, Monica [1 ]
Gonzalez-Cantalapiedra, Antonio [1 ]
Munoz, Fernando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Vet Fac, Anat Anim Prod & Vet Clin Sci Dept, Campus Univ S-N, Lugo 27002, Spain
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Dent, Fac Dent, Dept Biomat, Oslo, Norway
[3] Campus Univ S-N, Lugo 27002, Spain
关键词
Animal models; Polylactic acid; Bioceramic; 3D-printing technology; Composite scaffolds; Bone regeneration; 3D PRINTED SCAFFOLDS; POROUS SCAFFOLDS; LACTIC-ACID; STEM-CELLS; REGENERATION; DEFECT; FABRICATION; MODELS; PLA; BIOCOMPATIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.013
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
3D-printed composite scaffolds have emerged as an alternative to deal with existing limitations when facing bone reconstruction. The aim of the study was to systematically review the feasibility of using PLA/bioceramic composite scaffolds manufactured by 3D-printing technologies as bone grafting materi-als in preclinical in vivo studies. Electronic databases were searched using specific search terms, and thirteen manuscripts were selected after screening. The synthesis of the scaffolds was carried out using mainly extrusion-based techniques. Likewise, hydroxyapatite was the most used bioceramic for synthe-sizing composites with a PLA matrix. Among the selected studies, seven were conducted in rats and six in rabbits, but the high variability that exists regarding the experimental process made it difficult to compare them. Regarding the results, PLA/Bioceramic composite scaffolds have shown to be biocompat-ible and mechanically resistant. Preclinical studies elucidated the ability of the scaffolds to be used as bone grafts, allowing bone growing without adverse reactions. In conclusion, PLA/Bioceramics scaffolds have been demonstrated to be a promising alternative for treating bone defects. Nevertheless, more care should be taken when designing and performing in vivo trials, since the lack of standardization of the processes, which prevents the comparison of the results and reduces the quality of the information. Statement of Significance 3D-printed polylactic acid/bioceramic composite scaffolds have emerged as an alternative to deal with existing limitations when facing bone reconstruction. Since preclinical in vivo studies with animal mod-els represent a mandatory step for clinical translation, the present manuscript analyzed and discussed not only those aspects related to the selection of the bioceramic material, the synthesis of the implants and their characterization. But provides a new approach to understand how the design and perform of clinical trials, as well as the selection of the analysis methods, may affect the obtained results, by cov-ering authors' knowledgebase from veterinary medicine to biomaterial science. Thus, this study aims to systematically review the feasibility of using polylactic acid/bioceramic scaffolds as grafting materials in preclinical trials. & COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hydrogel-integrated 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Mitun Das
    Orna Sharabani-Yosef
    Noam Eliaz
    Daniel Mandler
    Journal of Materials Research, 2021, 36 : 3833 - 3842
  • [32] Mechanism and application of 3D-printed degradable bioceramic scaffolds for bone repair
    Lin, Hui
    Zhang, Liyun
    Zhang, Qiyue
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Xue
    Yan, Guangqi
    BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE, 2023, 11 (21) : 7034 - 7050
  • [33] Physicochemical Properties of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds
    Perez-Davila, Sara
    Garrido-Gulias, Natalia
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Laura
    Lopez-Alvarez, Miriam
    Serra, Julia
    Lopez-Periago, Jose Eugenio
    Gonzalez, Pio
    POLYMERS, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [34] A modular approach to 3D-printed bilayer composite scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering
    Maherani, Maryam
    Eslami, Hossein
    Poursamar, Seyed Ali
    Ansari, Mojtaba
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 35 (01)
  • [35] Multifunctional 3D-Printed Magnetic Polycaprolactone/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Petretta, Mauro
    Gambardella, Alessandro
    Desando, Giovanna
    Cavallo, Carola
    Bartolotti, Isabella
    Shelyakova, Tatiana
    Goranov, Vitaly
    Brucale, Marco
    Dediu, Valentin Alek
    Fini, Milena
    Grigolo, Brunella
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [36] Application of 3D-Printed, PLGA-Based Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering
    Sun, Fengbo
    Sun, Xiaodan
    Wang, Hetong
    Li, Chunxu
    Zhao, Yu
    Tian, Jingjing
    Lin, Yuanhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (10)
  • [37] 3D-printed alginate-hydroxyapatite aerogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Iglesias-Mejuto, Ana
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Carlos A.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2021, 131
  • [38] 3D-Printed Polyurethane Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Techniques and Emerging Applications
    Shanno, Kumari
    Mangala, Preeti
    Shanmugarajan, Thukani Sathanantham
    Bhyan, Bhupinder
    Shinde, Manoj Gangadhar
    Rane, Bhuvaneshwari Yogesh
    Ali, Syed Salman
    Kumar, Mohit
    Kumar, Pawan
    REGENERATIVE ENGINEERING AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [39] Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Ledda, Mario
    Merco, Miriam
    Sciortino, Antonio
    Scatena, Elisa
    Convertino, Annalisa
    Lisi, Antonella
    Del Gaudio, Costantino
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (10)
  • [40] 3D-Printed, Dual Crosslinked and Sterile Aerogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Iglesias-Mejuto, Ana
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Carlos A.
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (06)