Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)-based Characterization Solid Renal Masses: A role for quantitative imaging approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Varghese, Bino A. [1 ]
Rivas, Marielena [2 ]
Cen, Steven [1 ]
Lei, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Chang, Michael [3 ]
Lee, KwangJu [4 ]
Gunter, Jamie [1 ]
Amoedo, Renata L. [5 ]
Franco, Mario [1 ]
Hwang, Darryl H. [1 ]
Desai, Bhushan [1 ]
King, Kevin G. [6 ]
Cheng, Phillip M. [1 ]
Duddalwar, Vinay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ Richmond, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
[4] Samsung Medison Co Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Hosp Sao Rafael Rede Dor, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
CEUS; Radiomics; TIC; renal masses; visual assessment;
D O I
10.1117/12.2670366
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this prospective study, forty patients with solid renal masses who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were selected. Using the ImageJ software, renal masses and adjacent normal tissue were manually segmented from CEUS cine exams obtained using the built-in RS85 Samsung scanner software. For the radiomics analysis, one frame representing precontrast, early, peak, and delay enhancement phase were selected post segmentation from each CEUS clip. From each region of interest (ROI) within a tumor tissue normalized renal mass, 112 radiomic metrics were extracted using custom Matlab (R) code. For the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, the segmented ROIs were plotted as a function of time, and the data were fit to a washout curve. From these time-signal intensity curves, perfusion quantitative parameters, were generated. Wilcoxon rank sum test or univariate independent t-test depending on data normality were used for descriptive analyses. Agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistic. Of the 40 solid masses, 31 (77.5%) were malignant, 9 (22.5%) were benign based on histopathology. Excellent agreement was found between histopathological confirmation and visual assessment based on CEUS in discriminating solid renal masses into benign vs. malignant categories (kappa=0.89 95% confidence interval ( CI): (0.77,1)). The total agreement between the two was 92.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-based visual assessment was found to be 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed TIC metrics revealed statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups and between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subtypes. The study shows excellent agreement between visual assessment and histopathology, but with the room to improve in specificity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CHARACTERIZATION AND DIAGNOSTIC CONFIDENCE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FOR SOLID RENAL TUMORS
    Zhou, Xiang
    Yan, Feng
    Luo, Yan
    Peng, Yu-Lan
    Parajuly, Shyam Sundar
    Wen, Xiao-Rong
    Cai, Di-Ming
    Li, Yong-Zhong
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 37 (06): : 845 - 853
  • [42] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the abdominal vasculature
    Rafailidis, Vasileios
    Fang, Cheng
    Yusuf, Gibran T.
    Huang, Dean Y.
    Sidhu, Paul S.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (04) : 934 - 947
  • [43] How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Averkiou, Michalakis
    Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
    Barr, Richard G.
    Burns, Peter N.
    Calliada, Fabrizio
    Cantisani, Vito
    Choi, Byung
    Chammas, Maria C.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    Claudon, Michel
    Correas, Jean-Michel
    Cui, Xin-Wu
    Cosgrove, David
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    Dong, Yi
    Eisenbrey, John R.
    Fontanilla, Teresa
    Gilja, Odd Helge
    Ignee, Andre
    Jenssen, Christian
    Kono, Yuko
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Lassau, Nathalie
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Meloni, Maria Franca
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    Nolsoe, Christian
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Radzina, Maija
    Saftoiu, Adrian
    Sidhu, Paul S.
    Sporea, Ioan
    Schreiber-Dietrich, Dagmar
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Stanczak, Maria
    Weskott, Hans-Peter
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Willmann, Juergen Karl
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Vezeridis, Alexandar
    Westerway, Sue
    ULTRASOUND INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 4 (01) : E2 - E15
  • [44] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention
    Dean Y. Huang
    Gibran T. Yusuf
    Mohammad Daneshi
    Raymond Ramnarine
    Annamaria Deganello
    Maria E. Sellars
    Paul S. Sidhu
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 960 - 976
  • [45] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) of Pancreatic Cancer
    D’Onofrio M.
    Ciaravino V.
    Crosara S.
    De Robertis R.
    Pozzi Mucelli R.
    Current Radiology Reports, 3 (3)
  • [46] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Renal Imaging and Intervention
    Michael C. Olson
    E. Jason Abel
    Lori Mankowski Gettle
    Current Urology Reports, 2019, 20
  • [47] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention
    Huang, Dean Y.
    Yusuf, Gibran T.
    Daneshi, Mohammad
    Ramnarine, Raymond
    Deganello, Annamaria
    Sellars, Maria E.
    Sidhu, Paul S.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (04) : 960 - 976
  • [48] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Renal Imaging and Intervention
    Olson, Michael C.
    Abel, E. Jason
    Gettle, Lori Mankowski
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (11)
  • [49] Assessment of renal quality with quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for differentiating kidney histopathology before procurement
    Dong, Shangxin
    Zhang, Bo
    Chen, Zhishui
    Du, Dunfeng
    Shi, Huibo
    Zhao, Yuanyuan
    Tang, Yukun
    Luo, Hongchang
    Jiang, Jipin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 21 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [50] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound manifestations of renal masses undetectable on conventional ultrasound
    Tao, Lingling
    Fan, Jinfang
    Zhan, Weiwei
    Li, Weiwei
    Lu, Jian
    Yang, Nanan
    Ma, Binbin
    Zhou, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12