Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)-based Characterization Solid Renal Masses: A role for quantitative imaging approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Varghese, Bino A. [1 ]
Rivas, Marielena [2 ]
Cen, Steven [1 ]
Lei, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Chang, Michael [3 ]
Lee, KwangJu [4 ]
Gunter, Jamie [1 ]
Amoedo, Renata L. [5 ]
Franco, Mario [1 ]
Hwang, Darryl H. [1 ]
Desai, Bhushan [1 ]
King, Kevin G. [6 ]
Cheng, Phillip M. [1 ]
Duddalwar, Vinay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ Richmond, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
[4] Samsung Medison Co Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Hosp Sao Rafael Rede Dor, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
CEUS; Radiomics; TIC; renal masses; visual assessment;
D O I
10.1117/12.2670366
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this prospective study, forty patients with solid renal masses who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were selected. Using the ImageJ software, renal masses and adjacent normal tissue were manually segmented from CEUS cine exams obtained using the built-in RS85 Samsung scanner software. For the radiomics analysis, one frame representing precontrast, early, peak, and delay enhancement phase were selected post segmentation from each CEUS clip. From each region of interest (ROI) within a tumor tissue normalized renal mass, 112 radiomic metrics were extracted using custom Matlab (R) code. For the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, the segmented ROIs were plotted as a function of time, and the data were fit to a washout curve. From these time-signal intensity curves, perfusion quantitative parameters, were generated. Wilcoxon rank sum test or univariate independent t-test depending on data normality were used for descriptive analyses. Agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistic. Of the 40 solid masses, 31 (77.5%) were malignant, 9 (22.5%) were benign based on histopathology. Excellent agreement was found between histopathological confirmation and visual assessment based on CEUS in discriminating solid renal masses into benign vs. malignant categories (kappa=0.89 95% confidence interval ( CI): (0.77,1)). The total agreement between the two was 92.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-based visual assessment was found to be 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed TIC metrics revealed statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups and between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subtypes. The study shows excellent agreement between visual assessment and histopathology, but with the room to improve in specificity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Imaging of carotid arterial diseases with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
    Clevert, D. A.
    Sommer, W. H.
    Zengel, P.
    Helck, A.
    Reiser, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [22] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and perfusion imaging using VueBox®
    Wiesinger, Isabel
    Jung, Friedrich
    Jung, Ernst Michael
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2021, 78 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [23] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND (CEUS) IN CATS
    Leinonen, M.
    Raekallio, M.
    Vainio, O.
    Ruohoniemi, M.
    O'Brien, R. T.
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2010, 51 (02) : 190 - 190
  • [24] The value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the characterisation of patients with renal masses
    Ignee, Andre
    Straub, Bernd
    Brix, David
    Schuessler, Gudrun
    Ott, Michaela
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2010, 46 (04) : 275 - 290
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in renal imaging at an interdisciplinary ultrasound centre: Possibilities of dynamic microvascularisation and perfusion
    Putz, Franz Josef
    Erlmeier, Anna
    Wiesinger, Isabel
    Verloh, Niklas
    Stroszczynski, Christian
    Banas, Bernhard
    Jung, Ernst Michael
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2017, 66 (04) : 293 - 302
  • [26] Utility of Bosniak classification version 2019 for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) evaluation of cystic renal masses
    Angelini, L.
    Gioulis, E.
    Valerio, S.
    Piccoli, G.
    Serao, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S821 - S822
  • [27] Characterization of Splenogonadal Fusion by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Elastography
    Trottmann, M.
    Marcon, J.
    Mai, V
    D'Anastasi, M.
    Becker, A.
    Stief, C.
    Reiser, M.
    Clevert, D-A
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2015, 36 (02): : 97 - 100
  • [28] COMPLEMENTARY VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND (CEUS) AFTER CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CECT) IN EVALUATION OF INDETERMINATE SMALL HYPOVASCULAR RENAL MASSES
    Rocca, Giovanni Christian
    Tilli, Massimo
    Bernabei, Massimiliano
    Dall'ara, Sergio
    Ballista, Chiara
    Stela, Gamanji
    Benea, Giorgio
    Simone, Maurizio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (06) : 3699 - 3699
  • [29] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND (CEUS) AND ELASTOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES IN THE EVALUATION OF UNCLEAR SCROTAL MASSES
    Marcon, Julian
    Trottmann, Matthias
    D'Anastasi, Melvin
    Mai, Vera
    Ruebenthaler, Johannes
    Khoder, Wael
    Stief, Christian G.
    Reiser, Maximilian
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E38 - E38
  • [30] Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
    Greis, Christian
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2011, 49 (1-4) : 137 - 149