An artificial intelligence model based on transrectal ultrasound images of biopsy needle tract tissues to differentiate prostate cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Shiyu [1 ]
Ye, Xiuqin [2 ]
Tian, Hongtian [2 ]
Ding, Zhimin [2 ]
Cui, Chen [2 ]
Shi, Siyuan [2 ]
Yang, Yang [2 ]
Li, Guoqiu [2 ]
Chen, Jing [2 ]
Lin, Ziwei [2 ]
Ni, Zhipeng [2 ]
Xu, Jinfeng [2 ,3 ]
Dong, Fajin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Ultrasound, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Ultrasound, Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Ultrasound, 1017 Dongmen North Rd, Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; prostate cancer; transrectal ultrasound; POWER DOPPLER; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/postmj/qgad127
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model based on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) images of biopsy needle tract (BNT) tissues for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and to compare the PCa diagnostic performance of the radiologist model and clinical model.Methods A total of 1696 2D prostate TRUS images were involved from 142 patients between July 2021 and May 2022. The ResNet50 network model was utilized to train classification models with different input methods: original image (Whole model), BNT (Needle model), and combined image [Feature Pyramid Networks (FPN) model]. The training set, validation set, and test set were randomly assigned, then randomized 5-fold cross-validation between the training set and validation set was performed. The diagnostic effectiveness of AI models and image combination was accessed by an independent testing set. Then, the optimal AI model and image combination were selected to compare the diagnostic efficacy with that of senior radiologists and the clinical model.Results In the test set, the area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the FPN model were 0.934, 0.966, and 0.829, respectively; the diagnostic efficacy was improved compared with the Whole and Needle models, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), and was better than that of senior radiologists (area under the curve: 0.667). The FPN model detected more PCa compared with senior physicians (82.9% vs. 55.8%), with a 61.3% decrease in the false-positive rate and a 23.2% increase in overall accuracy (0.887 vs. 0.655).Conclusion The proposed FPN model can offer a new method for prostate tissue classification, improve the diagnostic performance, and may be a helpful tool to guide prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 236
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effects of hypnotherapy during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy for pain and anxiety
    Fatih Hızlı
    Osman Özcan
    İsmail Selvi
    Pınar Eraslan
    Aydın Köşüş
    Okan Baş
    Taha Numan Yıkılmaz
    Oğuz Güven
    Halil Başar
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2015, 47 : 1773 - 1777
  • [42] Prevalence and predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate - Editorial Comment
    Stamey, TA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02): : 508 - 509
  • [43] The effects of hypnotherapy during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy for pain and anxiety
    Hizli, Fatih
    Ozcan, Osman
    Selvi, Ismail
    Eraslan, Pinar
    Kosus, Aydin
    Bas, Okan
    Yikilmaz, Taha Numan
    Guven, Oguz
    Basar, Halil
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (11) : 1773 - 1777
  • [44] Transrectal ultrasound performed immediately after prostate biopsy: Imaging features and ultrasound-guided compression to bleeding biopsy tract
    Park, B. K.
    Kim, S. H.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [45] Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy:: A prospective study and review of the literature
    Rodríguez, LV
    Terris, MK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06): : 2115 - 2120
  • [46] Prostate cancer classification from ultrasound and MRI images using deep learning based Explainable Artificial Intelligence
    Hassan, Md Rafiul
    Islam, Md Fakrul
    Uddin, Md Zia
    Ghoshal, Goutam
    Hassan, Mohammad Mehedi
    Huda, Shamsul
    Fortino, Giancarlo
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2022, 127 : 462 - 472
  • [47] INTEGRATING MR AND ULTRASOUND IMAGES FOR AI-BASED PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IMAGES: A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH CLINICIANS
    Jahanandish, Hassan
    Vesal, Sulaiman
    Bhattacharya, Indrani
    Kornberg, Zachary
    Zhou, Steve Ran
    Sommer, Elijah Richard
    Choi, Moon Hyung
    Fan, Richard E.
    Rusu, Mirabela
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E317 - E317
  • [48] Prediction of Gleason score in prostate cancer patients based on radiomic features of transrectal ultrasound images
    Cheng, Tao
    Li, Huiming
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1154): : 415 - 421
  • [49] The incidence of hyperechoic prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy specimens
    Spajic, Borislav
    Eupic, Hrvoje
    Tomas, Davor
    Stimac, Goran
    Kruslin, Bozo
    Kraus, Ognjan
    UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (04) : 734 - 737
  • [50] Diffusion MRI Predicts Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy Results in Prostate Cancer Detection
    Chen, Yu-Jen
    Pu, Yeong-Shiau
    Chueh, Shih-Chieh
    Shun, Chia-Tung
    Chu, Woei-Chyn
    Tseng, Wen-Yih Isaac
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (02) : 356 - 363