An artificial intelligence model based on transrectal ultrasound images of biopsy needle tract tissues to differentiate prostate cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Shiyu [1 ]
Ye, Xiuqin [2 ]
Tian, Hongtian [2 ]
Ding, Zhimin [2 ]
Cui, Chen [2 ]
Shi, Siyuan [2 ]
Yang, Yang [2 ]
Li, Guoqiu [2 ]
Chen, Jing [2 ]
Lin, Ziwei [2 ]
Ni, Zhipeng [2 ]
Xu, Jinfeng [2 ,3 ]
Dong, Fajin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Ultrasound, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Ultrasound, Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Ultrasound, 1017 Dongmen North Rd, Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; prostate cancer; transrectal ultrasound; POWER DOPPLER; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/postmj/qgad127
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model based on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) images of biopsy needle tract (BNT) tissues for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and to compare the PCa diagnostic performance of the radiologist model and clinical model.Methods A total of 1696 2D prostate TRUS images were involved from 142 patients between July 2021 and May 2022. The ResNet50 network model was utilized to train classification models with different input methods: original image (Whole model), BNT (Needle model), and combined image [Feature Pyramid Networks (FPN) model]. The training set, validation set, and test set were randomly assigned, then randomized 5-fold cross-validation between the training set and validation set was performed. The diagnostic effectiveness of AI models and image combination was accessed by an independent testing set. Then, the optimal AI model and image combination were selected to compare the diagnostic efficacy with that of senior radiologists and the clinical model.Results In the test set, the area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the FPN model were 0.934, 0.966, and 0.829, respectively; the diagnostic efficacy was improved compared with the Whole and Needle models, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), and was better than that of senior radiologists (area under the curve: 0.667). The FPN model detected more PCa compared with senior physicians (82.9% vs. 55.8%), with a 61.3% decrease in the false-positive rate and a 23.2% increase in overall accuracy (0.887 vs. 0.655).Conclusion The proposed FPN model can offer a new method for prostate tissue classification, improve the diagnostic performance, and may be a helpful tool to guide prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 236
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Empirical management of urinary tract infections complicating transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Tal, R
    Livne, PM
    Lask, DM
    Baniel, J
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (05): : 1762 - 1765
  • [32] Operator is an Independent Predictor of Detecting Prostate Cancer at Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Toi, Ants
    Lockwood, Gina A.
    Evans, Andrew
    Finelli, Antonio
    O'Malley, Martin
    Margolis, Myles
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06): : 2659 - 2663
  • [33] Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Raja, J
    Ramachandran, N
    Munneke, G
    Patel, U
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 61 (02) : 142 - 153
  • [34] Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate: does it still have a role in prostate cancer diagnosis?
    Moe, Andrew
    Hayne, Dickon
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) : 3018 - 3024
  • [35] Predictors of prostate cancer on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy
    Park, SJ
    Miyake, H
    Hara, I
    Eto, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 10 (02) : 68 - 71
  • [36] The importance of pathological report in echo-guided transrectal prostate needle biopsy in prostate cancer
    Hortopan, M.
    Herlea, V.
    Mihai, M.
    Pechianu, C.
    Voinea, S.
    Patrascoiu, S. T.
    Vrabie, C.
    Chitescu, M.
    Sinescu, I.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 459 : S282 - S282
  • [37] Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy is still a standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis - A multicentre Australian analysis of infection rates
    Parkin, C. J.
    Louie-Johnsun, M. W.
    Chapman, S.
    Shepherd, A.
    Mccredie, S.
    Kam, J.
    Joshi, N.
    Gikenye, N.
    Grills, R.
    Smilovic, T.
    Manivasagam, A.
    Weinstein, S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1403 - S1403
  • [38] 3D prostate model reconstruction from 2D transrectal ultrasound biopsy images
    Cool, D
    Downey, D
    Peters, T
    Fenster, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2154 - 2154
  • [39] Application of transrectal ultrasound-guided repeat needle biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Chinese population: A retrospective study
    Wang, Yi
    Wang, Xizhi
    Yu, Jiang
    Ouyang, Jun
    Shen, Weidong
    Zhou, Yibin
    Hou, Jianquan
    Wen, Duangai
    Pu, Jinxian
    Shan, Yuxi
    Xue, Boxin
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 21
  • [40] Pain during transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy Of the prostate: comparison of the use or not of lidocaine Gel
    Diaz Perez, Gilmer A.
    Meza Montoya, Luis
    Morante Deza, Carlos
    Pow-Sang Godoy, Mariela
    Destefano Urrutia, Victor
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2009, 33 (02): : 134 - 137