Survival by time-to-administration of amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in shock-refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

被引:10
|
作者
Lupton, Joshua R. [1 ,2 ]
Neth, Matthew R. [1 ]
Sahni, Ritu [1 ]
Jui, Jonathan [1 ]
Wittwer, Lynn [1 ]
Newgard, Craig D. [1 ]
Daya, Mohamud R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Portland, OR USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Policy & Res Emergency Med, Dept Emergency Med, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,mail code CDW CPR, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; ADVANCED STATISTICS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; MISSING DATA; RESUSCITATION; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; EMS;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14716
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Amiodarone and lidocaine have not been shown to have a clear survival benefit compared to placebo for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, randomized trials may have been impacted by delayed administration of the study drugs. We sought to evaluate how timing from emergency medical services (EMS) arrival on scene to drug administration affects the efficacy of amiodarone and lidocaine compared to placebo. Method: This is a secondary analysis of the 10-site, 55-EMS-agency double-blind randomized controlled amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in OHCA study. We included patients with initial shockable rhythms who received the study drugs of amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo before achieving return of spontaneous circulation. We performed logistic regression analyses evaluating survival to hospital discharge and secondary outcomes of survival to admission and functional survival (modified Rankin scale score <= 3). We evaluated the samples stratified by early (<8 min) and late administration groups (>= 8 min). We compared outcomes for amiodarone and lidocaine compared to placebo and adjust for potential confounders. Results: There were 2802 patients meeting inclusion criteria, with 879 (31.4%) in the early (<8 min) and 1923 (68.6%) in the late (>= 8 min) groups. In the early group, patients receiving amiodarone, compared to placebo, had significantly higher survival to admission (62.0% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.001; adjusted OR [95% CI] 1.76 [1.24--2.50]), survival to discharge (37.1% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.021; 1.56 [1.07--2.29]), and functional survival (31.6% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.029; 1.55 [1.04--2.32]). There were no significant differences with early lidocaine compared to early placebo (p > 0.05). Patients in the late group who received amiodarone or lidocaine had no significant differences in outcomes at discharge compared to placebo (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The early administration of amiodarone, particularly within 8 min, is associated with greater survival to admission, survival to discharge, and functional survival compared to placebo in patients with an initial shockable rhythm.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 917
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The use of undiluted amiodarone in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Skrifvars, MB
    Kuisma, M
    Boyd, J
    Määttä, T
    Repo, J
    Rosenberg, PH
    Castren, M
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 48 (05) : 582 - 587
  • [32] A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation
    Smida, Tanner
    Crowe, Remle
    Price, Bradley S.
    Scheidler, James
    Martin, P. S.
    Shukis, Michael
    Bardes, James
    RESUSCITATION, 2025, 208
  • [33] Keywords: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation Shock index Survival Prognosis
    van Bergen, Kim M. G.
    van Kooten, Lottie
    Eurlings, Casper G. M. J.
    Foudraine, Norbert A.
    Lameijer, Heleen
    Meeder, Joan G.
    Rahel, Braim M.
    Versteegen, Marieke G. J.
    van Osch, Frits H. M.
    Barten, Dennis G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 58 : 175 - 185
  • [35] The Relationship Between Intra-arrest Transport and Survival for Refractory Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Grunau, Brian E.
    Kime, Noah
    Rea, Tom
    Van Belle, Gerald
    Elmer, Jonathan
    Vaillancourt, Christian
    Leroux, Brian
    Menegazzi, James J.
    Morrison, Laurie
    Kudenchuk, Peter
    Zive, Dana
    Le, Nancy
    Herren, Heather
    Verbeek, Richard
    Austin, Michael
    Aufderheide, Tom
    Idris, Ahamed
    Richmond, Neal
    Colella, Riccardo
    Christenson, Jim
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [36] Time to bystander CPR and survival for witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    O'Keefe, Evan L.
    Jawad, Mohammad Abdel
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Nguyen, Dan
    Ikemura, Nobuhiro
    Chan, Paul S.
    RESUSCITATION, 2025, 209
  • [37] Time to epinephrine and survival after paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Fukuda, Tatsuma
    Kondo, Yutaka
    Hayashida, Kei
    Sekiguchi, Hiroshi
    Kukita, Ichiro
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 4 (03) : 144 - 151
  • [38] Time to Epinephrine Administration and Survival From Nonshockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Among Children and Adults
    Hansen, Matthew
    Schmicker, Robert H.
    Newgard, Craig D.
    Grunau, Brian
    Scheuermeyer, Frank
    Cheskes, Sheldon
    Vithalani, Veer
    Alnaji, Fuad
    Rea, Thomas
    Idris, Ahamed H.
    Herren, Heather
    Hutchison, Jamie
    Austin, Mike
    Egan, Debra
    Daya, Mohamud
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 137 (19) : 2032 - 2040
  • [39] Effect of Epinephrine Administration in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Kumar, Ashish
    Doshi, Rajkumar
    Shariff, Mariam
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (03) : 351 - 351
  • [40] Health system costs of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to time to shock
    Van Alem, AR
    Dijkgraaf, MGW
    Tijssen, JGR
    Koster, RW
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 387 - 388