Survival by time-to-administration of amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in shock-refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

被引:10
|
作者
Lupton, Joshua R. [1 ,2 ]
Neth, Matthew R. [1 ]
Sahni, Ritu [1 ]
Jui, Jonathan [1 ]
Wittwer, Lynn [1 ]
Newgard, Craig D. [1 ]
Daya, Mohamud R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Portland, OR USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Policy & Res Emergency Med, Dept Emergency Med, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,mail code CDW CPR, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; ADVANCED STATISTICS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; MISSING DATA; RESUSCITATION; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; EMS;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14716
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Amiodarone and lidocaine have not been shown to have a clear survival benefit compared to placebo for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, randomized trials may have been impacted by delayed administration of the study drugs. We sought to evaluate how timing from emergency medical services (EMS) arrival on scene to drug administration affects the efficacy of amiodarone and lidocaine compared to placebo. Method: This is a secondary analysis of the 10-site, 55-EMS-agency double-blind randomized controlled amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in OHCA study. We included patients with initial shockable rhythms who received the study drugs of amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo before achieving return of spontaneous circulation. We performed logistic regression analyses evaluating survival to hospital discharge and secondary outcomes of survival to admission and functional survival (modified Rankin scale score <= 3). We evaluated the samples stratified by early (<8 min) and late administration groups (>= 8 min). We compared outcomes for amiodarone and lidocaine compared to placebo and adjust for potential confounders. Results: There were 2802 patients meeting inclusion criteria, with 879 (31.4%) in the early (<8 min) and 1923 (68.6%) in the late (>= 8 min) groups. In the early group, patients receiving amiodarone, compared to placebo, had significantly higher survival to admission (62.0% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.001; adjusted OR [95% CI] 1.76 [1.24--2.50]), survival to discharge (37.1% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.021; 1.56 [1.07--2.29]), and functional survival (31.6% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.029; 1.55 [1.04--2.32]). There were no significant differences with early lidocaine compared to early placebo (p > 0.05). Patients in the late group who received amiodarone or lidocaine had no significant differences in outcomes at discharge compared to placebo (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The early administration of amiodarone, particularly within 8 min, is associated with greater survival to admission, survival to discharge, and functional survival compared to placebo in patients with an initial shockable rhythm.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 917
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Survival and Neurological Outcomes in Shock Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Rahimi, Mahbod
    Dorian, Paul
    Cheskes, Sheldon
    Lebovic, Gerald
    Lin, Steve
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (07) : 903 - 912
  • [22] Antiarrhythmic drugs in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-what does the Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo Study tell us?
    Ho, Andrew Fu Wah
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (07) : E604 - E606
  • [23] Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Nonshockable-Turned-Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The ALPS Study (Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo)
    Kudenchuk, Peter J.
    Leroux, Brian G.
    Daya, Mohamud
    Rea, Thomas
    Vaillancourt, Christian
    Morrison, Laurie J.
    Callaway, Clifton W.
    Christenson, James
    Ornato, Joseph P.
    Dunford, James V.
    Wittwer, Lynn
    Weisfeldt, Myron L.
    Aufderheide, Tom P.
    Vilke, Gary M.
    Idris, Ahamed H.
    Stiell, Ian G.
    Colella, M. Riccardo
    Kayea, Tami
    Egan, Debra
    Desvigne-Nickens, Patrice
    Gray, Pamela
    Gray, Randal
    Straight, Ron
    Dorian, Paul
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136 (22) : 2119 - 2131
  • [24] The time dependent association of adrenaline administration and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Ewy, Gordon A.
    Bobrow, Bentley J.
    Chikani, Vatsal
    Sanders, Arthur B.
    Otto, Charles W.
    Spaite, Daniel W.
    Kern, Karl B.
    RESUSCITATION, 2015, 96 : 180 - 185
  • [25] Comparing Drugs for Out-of-hospital, Shock-refractory Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Srisurapanont, Karan
    Thepchinda, Thachapon
    Kwangsukstith, Siriaran
    Saetiao, Suchada
    Kasirawat, Chayada
    Janmayka, Worawan
    Wongtanasarasin, Wachira
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (04) : 834 - 841
  • [26] Time to first defibrillation and survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with refractory ventricular fibrillation
    Lee, Stephen Gyung Won
    Park, Jeong Ho
    Ro, Young Sun
    Hong, Ki Jeong
    Song, Kyoung Jun
    Shin, Sang Do
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 40 : 96 - 102
  • [27] What Influence does the Administration Route of Antiarrhythmics have on Survival of Patients with shock-refractory Cardiac Arrest?
    Volberg, Christian
    NOTARZT, 2020, 36 (05):
  • [28] Amiodarone or nifekalant upon hospital arrival for refractory ventricular fibrillation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Tagami, Takashi
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Ishinokami, Saori
    Oyanagi, Masao
    Kitahashi, Akiko
    Fukuda, Reo
    Unemoto, Kyoko
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    RESUSCITATION, 2016, 109 : 127 - 132
  • [29] Hospital variability of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival
    Liu, J. Marc
    Yang, Qing
    Pirrallo, Ronald G.
    Klein, John P.
    Aufderheide, Tom P.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2008, 12 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [30] Comorbidity and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Hirlekar, Geir
    Jonsson, Martin
    Karlsson, Thomas
    Hollenberg, Jacob
    Albertsson, Per
    Herlitz, Johan
    RESUSCITATION, 2018, 133 : 118 - 123