Intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT lymphangiography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography in microminipig

被引:0
|
作者
Tanahashi, Yukichi [1 ,2 ]
Shoda, Shinichi [3 ]
Kawada, Hiroshi [1 ]
Ando, Tomohiro [1 ]
Nagata, Shoma [1 ]
Takasu, Masaki [4 ]
Hyodo, Fuminori [5 ]
Goshima, Satoshi [2 ]
Mori, Takashi [4 ]
Matsuo, Masayuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Univ, Dept Radiol, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 5011194, Japan
[2] Hamamatsu Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 1-20-1 Handayama,Higashi Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 4313192, Japan
[3] Gifu Univ Hosp, Radiol Serv, Gifu, Japan
[4] Gifu Univ, Fac Appl Biol Sci, Joint Dept Vet Med, Gifu, Japan
[5] Gifu Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Frontier Sci Imaging, Gifu, Japan
关键词
Animal experimentation; Lymphatic vessels; Thoracic duct; Lymphography; Tomography; X-ray computed;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-09463-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility and image quality of intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT lymphangiography (DCCTL) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography (DCMRL) in microminipigs.MethodsOur institution's committee for animal research and welfare provided approval. Three microminipigs underwent DCCTL and DCMRL after inguinal lymph node injection of 0.1 mL/kg contrast media. Mean CT values on DCCTL and signal intensity (SI) on DCMRL were measured at the venous angle and thoracic duct (TD). The contrast enhancement index (CEI; increase in CT values pre- to post-contrast) and signal intensity ratio (SIR; SI of lymph divided by SI of muscle) were evaluated. The morphologic legibility, visibility, and continuity of lymphatics were qualitatively evaluated using a 4-point scale. Two microminipigs underwent DCCTL and DCMRL after lymphatic disruption and the detectability of lymphatic leakage was evaluated.ResultsThe CEI peaked at 5-10 min in all microminipigs. The SIR peaked at 2-4 min in two microminipigs and at 4-10 min in one microminipig. The peak CEI and SIR values were 235.6 HU and 4.8 for venous angle, 239.4 HU and 2.1 for upper TD, and 387.3 HU and 2.1 for middle TD. The visibility and continuity of upper-middle TD scores were 4.0 and 3.3-3.7 for DCCTL, and 4.0 and 4.0 for DCMRL. In the injured lymphatic model, both DCCTL and DCMRL demonstrated lymphatic leakage.ConclusionsDCCTL and DCMRL in a microminipig model enabled excellent visualization of central lymphatic ducts and lymphatic leakage, indicating the research and clinical potential of both modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:3165 / 3171
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, and their combination for adrenal tumor diagnosis in men
    Yan, Minghui
    Wang, Yanan
    Jiao, Lianghong
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2024, 20 (07) : 113 - 119
  • [42] Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging of cervical carcinoma
    Sato, Y
    Shimizu, T
    Kagei, K
    Suzuki, K
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 570 - 570
  • [43] Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Response
    Heye, Tobias J.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (02) : 621 - 621
  • [44] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulas
    Spencer, JA
    Ward, J
    Beckingham, IJ
    Adams, C
    Ambrose, NS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (03) : 735 - 741
  • [45] DUAL DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING
    MIYATI, T
    KASAI, H
    SHUNDO, H
    BANNO, T
    IMAZAWA, M
    OHBA, S
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 449 - 449
  • [46] Spiral imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Poonawalla, AH
    Stafford, RJ
    Glover, GH
    Hazle, JD
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 196 - 196
  • [47] Techniques of dynamic subtraction contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Leiner, T
    Ho, KYJAM
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2000, 20 (04) : 1113 - 1113
  • [48] The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography
    Brinck, U
    Fischer, U
    Korabiowska, M
    Jutrowski, M
    Schauer, A
    Grabbe, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (05) : 1331 - 1334
  • [49] Analysis of contrast-enhanced dynamic MR images of the lung
    Torheim, G
    Amundsen, T
    Rinck, PA
    Haraldseth, O
    Sebastiani, G
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (04) : 577 - 587
  • [50] Fundamentals of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging
    Paldino, Michael J.
    Barboriak, Daniel P.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 17 (02) : 277 - +