Effect of surgical timing on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis

被引:2
|
作者
Cho, Nam Yong [1 ]
Chervu, Nikhil L. [1 ]
Sakowitz, Sara [1 ]
Verma, Arjun [1 ]
Kronen, Elsa [1 ]
Orellana, Manuel [1 ]
de Virgilio, Christian [2 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Cardiac Surg, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] UCLA, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] UCLA, Ctr Hlth Sci, 10833 Conte Ave, Room 62-249, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
ACUTE-CARE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; BILIARY PANCREATITIS; HOSPITAL VOLUME; IMPACT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Retrospective and single-center studies have demonstrated that early cholecystectomy is associated with shorter length of stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. However, these studies are not powered to detect differences in adverse events. Using a nationally representative cohort, we evaluated the association of timing for cholecystectomy with clinical outcomes and resource use in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.Methods: All adult hospitalizations for gallstone pancreatitis were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, patient comorbidities and operative characteristics were determined. Patients with end-organ dysfunction or cholangitis were excluded to isolate those with only mild gallstone pancreatitis. Major adverse events were defined as a composite of 30-day mortality and perioperative (cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, infectious, and thromboembolic) complications. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was divided into Early (within 2 days of admission) and Late (>2 days after admission) cohorts. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were then used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing with major adverse events and secondary outcomes of interest, including postoperative hospital duration of stay, costs, non -home discharge, and readmission rate within 30 days of discharge.Results: Of an estimated 129,451 admissions for acute gallstone pancreatitis, 25.6% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to patients in the Early cohort, Late cohort patients were older (56 [40-69] vs 53 [37 -66] years, P < .001), more likely male (36.6 vs 32.8%, P < .001), and more frequently underwent preop-erative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (22.2 vs 10.9%, P < .001). In addition, the Late cohort had higher unadjusted rates of major adverse events and index hospitalization costs, compared to Early. After risk adjustment, late cholecystectomy was associated with higher odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.51) and overall adjusted hospitalization costs by $2,700 (95% confidence interval 2,400-2,800). In addition, compared to the Early group, those in the Late cohort had increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03 -1.23) and non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.55).Conclusion: Cholecystectomy >2 days after admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis was independently associated with increased major adverse events, costs, 30-day readmissions, and non-home discharge. Given the significant clinical and financial consequences, reduced timing to surgery should be prioritized in the overall management of this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 665
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Index cholecystectomy rates in mild gallstone pancreatitis: a single-centre experience
    Butler, Reuban J.
    Grieve, David A.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (10) : 2011 - 2014
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild acute gallstone pancreatitis
    Morris, S.
    Gurusamy, K. S.
    Patel, N.
    Davidson, B. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (07) : 828 - 835
  • [43] NATIONWIDE TRENDS IN CHOLECYSTECTOMY RATES AMONG PATIENTS ADMITTED WITH MILD GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS
    Sharma, Tanuj
    Shah, Ishani
    Alani, Mustafa A.
    Vyas, Neil
    Turse, Erica P.
    Kadkhodayan, Kambiz S.
    Srinivasan, Indu
    Reddymasu, Savio
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S1132 - S1132
  • [44] The change of a DGH emergency surgical service leads to marked improvements in timing of cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis, in line with international guidance
    Ainley, Paul
    Kerr, Barry
    Davis, Helen
    Gallagher, Charles
    Byrnes, Colman
    McAree, Barry
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [45] Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Gallstone Pancreatitis - Outcomes in a Modern Upper GI Unit
    Jones, Rebecca
    Rowell, Anthony
    Whitmore, Helen
    Bush, Alexander
    Bowling, Kirk
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 51 - 51
  • [46] Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Mild Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Du-Jiang
    Lu, Hui-Min
    Guo, Qiang
    Lu, Shan
    Zhang, Ling
    Hu, Wei-Ming
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (04): : 379 - 388
  • [47] Gallstone Pancreatitis: The Race to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Foss, H.
    Dowdeswell, M.
    Gates, Z.
    Strain, S.
    Khaira, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 151 - 151
  • [48] Gallstone pancreatitis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Bulkin, AJ
    Tebyani, N
    Dorazio, RA
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1997, 63 (10) : 900 - 903
  • [49] TIMING OF SURGERY IN GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS
    COOK, RD
    REED, K
    ROSENTHAL, D
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 81 (09) : S86 - S86
  • [50] GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS - THE TIMING OF SURGERY
    KELLY, TR
    SURGERY, 1980, 88 (03) : 345 - 350