Effect of surgical timing on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis

被引:2
|
作者
Cho, Nam Yong [1 ]
Chervu, Nikhil L. [1 ]
Sakowitz, Sara [1 ]
Verma, Arjun [1 ]
Kronen, Elsa [1 ]
Orellana, Manuel [1 ]
de Virgilio, Christian [2 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Cardiac Surg, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] UCLA, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] UCLA, Ctr Hlth Sci, 10833 Conte Ave, Room 62-249, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
ACUTE-CARE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; BILIARY PANCREATITIS; HOSPITAL VOLUME; IMPACT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Retrospective and single-center studies have demonstrated that early cholecystectomy is associated with shorter length of stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. However, these studies are not powered to detect differences in adverse events. Using a nationally representative cohort, we evaluated the association of timing for cholecystectomy with clinical outcomes and resource use in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.Methods: All adult hospitalizations for gallstone pancreatitis were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, patient comorbidities and operative characteristics were determined. Patients with end-organ dysfunction or cholangitis were excluded to isolate those with only mild gallstone pancreatitis. Major adverse events were defined as a composite of 30-day mortality and perioperative (cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, infectious, and thromboembolic) complications. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was divided into Early (within 2 days of admission) and Late (>2 days after admission) cohorts. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were then used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing with major adverse events and secondary outcomes of interest, including postoperative hospital duration of stay, costs, non -home discharge, and readmission rate within 30 days of discharge.Results: Of an estimated 129,451 admissions for acute gallstone pancreatitis, 25.6% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to patients in the Early cohort, Late cohort patients were older (56 [40-69] vs 53 [37 -66] years, P < .001), more likely male (36.6 vs 32.8%, P < .001), and more frequently underwent preop-erative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (22.2 vs 10.9%, P < .001). In addition, the Late cohort had higher unadjusted rates of major adverse events and index hospitalization costs, compared to Early. After risk adjustment, late cholecystectomy was associated with higher odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.51) and overall adjusted hospitalization costs by $2,700 (95% confidence interval 2,400-2,800). In addition, compared to the Early group, those in the Late cohort had increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03 -1.23) and non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.55).Conclusion: Cholecystectomy >2 days after admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis was independently associated with increased major adverse events, costs, 30-day readmissions, and non-home discharge. Given the significant clinical and financial consequences, reduced timing to surgery should be prioritized in the overall management of this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 665
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early cholecystectomy for mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis shortens hospital stay
    Rosing, David K.
    de Virgilio, Christian
    Yaghoubian, Arezou
    Putnam, Brant A.
    El Masry, Monica
    Kaji, Amy
    Stabile, Bruce E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 205 (06) : 762 - 766
  • [32] Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy on late outcome after gallstone pancreatitis
    Hammarstrom, LE
    Stridbeck, H
    Ihse, I
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 (03) : 333 - 336
  • [33] Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Mild Gallstone Pancreatitis Time for a Paradigm Shift
    Falor, Ann E.
    de Virgilio, Christian
    Stabile, Bruce E.
    Kaji, Amy H.
    Caton, Amy
    Kokubun, Brent A.
    Schmit, Paul J.
    Thompson, Jesse E.
    Saltzman, Darin J.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (11) : 1031 - 1035
  • [34] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute mild gallstone pancreatitis: how early is safe?
    Giuffrida, Pablo
    Biagiola, David
    Cristiano, Agustin
    Ardiles, Victoria
    de Santibanes, Martin
    Sanchez Claria, Rodrigo
    Pekolj, Juan
    de Santibanes, Eduardo
    Mazza, Oscar
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : 129 - 135
  • [35] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute mild gallstone pancreatitis: how early is safe?
    Pablo Giuffrida
    David Biagiola
    Agustín Cristiano
    Victoria Ardiles
    Martín de Santibañes
    Rodrigo Sanchez Clariá
    Juan Pekolj
    Eduardo de Santibañes
    Oscar Mazza
    Updates in Surgery, 2020, 72 : 129 - 135
  • [36] Delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis: re-admissions and outcomes
    Cameron, DR
    Goodman, AJ
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2004, 86 (05) : 358 - 362
  • [37] Time to Cholecystectomy for Gallstone Pancreatitis
    Powell, S.
    Froggatt, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [38] Gallstone Pancreatitis Why Not Cholecystectomy?
    Worhunsky, David J.
    Visser, Brendan C.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (09) : 872 - 872
  • [39] Gallstone Pancreatitis Without Cholecystectomy
    Hwang, Stephanie S.
    Li, Bonnie H.
    Haigh, Philip I.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (09) : 867 - 872
  • [40] Cholecystectomy for people aged 50 years or more with mild gallstone pancreatitis: predictors and outcomes of index and interval procedures
    Blundell, Jian D.
    Gandy, Robert C.
    Close, Jacqueline
    Harvey, Lara
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (05) : 246 - 252