Effect of surgical timing on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis

被引:2
|
作者
Cho, Nam Yong [1 ]
Chervu, Nikhil L. [1 ]
Sakowitz, Sara [1 ]
Verma, Arjun [1 ]
Kronen, Elsa [1 ]
Orellana, Manuel [1 ]
de Virgilio, Christian [2 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Cardiac Surg, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] UCLA, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] UCLA, Ctr Hlth Sci, 10833 Conte Ave, Room 62-249, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
ACUTE-CARE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; BILIARY PANCREATITIS; HOSPITAL VOLUME; IMPACT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Retrospective and single-center studies have demonstrated that early cholecystectomy is associated with shorter length of stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. However, these studies are not powered to detect differences in adverse events. Using a nationally representative cohort, we evaluated the association of timing for cholecystectomy with clinical outcomes and resource use in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.Methods: All adult hospitalizations for gallstone pancreatitis were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, patient comorbidities and operative characteristics were determined. Patients with end-organ dysfunction or cholangitis were excluded to isolate those with only mild gallstone pancreatitis. Major adverse events were defined as a composite of 30-day mortality and perioperative (cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, infectious, and thromboembolic) complications. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was divided into Early (within 2 days of admission) and Late (>2 days after admission) cohorts. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were then used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing with major adverse events and secondary outcomes of interest, including postoperative hospital duration of stay, costs, non -home discharge, and readmission rate within 30 days of discharge.Results: Of an estimated 129,451 admissions for acute gallstone pancreatitis, 25.6% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to patients in the Early cohort, Late cohort patients were older (56 [40-69] vs 53 [37 -66] years, P < .001), more likely male (36.6 vs 32.8%, P < .001), and more frequently underwent preop-erative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (22.2 vs 10.9%, P < .001). In addition, the Late cohort had higher unadjusted rates of major adverse events and index hospitalization costs, compared to Early. After risk adjustment, late cholecystectomy was associated with higher odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.51) and overall adjusted hospitalization costs by $2,700 (95% confidence interval 2,400-2,800). In addition, compared to the Early group, those in the Late cohort had increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03 -1.23) and non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.55).Conclusion: Cholecystectomy >2 days after admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis was independently associated with increased major adverse events, costs, 30-day readmissions, and non-home discharge. Given the significant clinical and financial consequences, reduced timing to surgery should be prioritized in the overall management of this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 665
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rationale of on admission surgical intervention on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis
    Alhanafy, Saad S.
    Shaheen, Mahmoud
    Alanazi, Ahmed B.
    Elsisy, Alaa A. E.
    Seddik, Randa M.
    Alabassy, Mahmoud M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 43 (02): : 480 - 484
  • [2] The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis
    Taylor, E
    Wong, C
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2004, 70 (11) : 971 - 975
  • [3] Shifting Surgical Paradigms for Cholecystectomy in Mild Gallstone Pancreatitis
    West, Michael A.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (11) : 1035 - 1035
  • [4] Predicting a 'difficult cholecystectomy' after mild gallstone pancreatitis
    da Costa, David W.
    Schepers, Nicolien J.
    Bouwense, Stefan A.
    Hollemans, Robbert A.
    van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
    Bollen, Thomas L.
    Consten, Esther C.
    van Goor, Harry
    Hofker, Sijbrand
    Gooszen, Hein G.
    Boerma, Djamila
    Besselink, Marc G.
    HPB, 2019, 21 (07) : 827 - 833
  • [5] Acute gallstone pancreatitis -: Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild and severe disease
    Uhl, W
    Müller, CA
    Krähenbühl, L
    Schmid, SW
    Schölzel, S
    Büchler, MW
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (11): : 1070 - 1076
  • [6] Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis
    Bakker, O. J.
    van Santvoort, H. C.
    Hagenaars, J. C.
    Besselink, M. G.
    Bollen, T. L.
    Gooszen, H. G.
    Schaapherder, A. F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (10) : 1446 - 1454
  • [7] Treatment strategy for gallstone pancreatitis and the timing of cholecystectomy
    Chao Hu
    Shi-Qiang Shen
    Zu-Bing Chen
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2014, (02) : 42 - 48
  • [8] Treatment strategy for gallstone pancreatitis and the timing of cholecystectomy
    Hu, Chao
    Shen, Shi-Qiang
    Chen, Zu-Bing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF META-ANALYSIS, 2014, 2 (02) : 42 - 48
  • [9] Optimal timing of cholecystectomy in children with gallstone pancreatitis
    Badru, Faidah
    Saxena, Saurabh
    Breeden, Robert
    Bourdillon, Maximillan
    Fitzpatrick, Colleen
    Chatoorgoon, Kaveer
    Greenspon, Jose
    Villalona, Gustavo
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 215 : 225 - 230
  • [10] The impact of timing of cholecystectomy following gallstone pancreatitis
    Johnstone, Marianne
    Marriott, Paul
    Royle, T. James
    Richardson, Caroline E.
    Torrance, Andrew
    Hepburn, Elizabeth
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Patel, Abhilasha
    Bartlett, David C.
    Pinkney, Thomas D.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2014, 12 (03): : 134 - 140