Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review

被引:15
|
作者
Sumner, Jennifer [2 ,5 ]
Lim, Hui Wen [2 ]
Chong, Lin Siew [2 ]
Bundele, Anjali [2 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Amartya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kayambu, Geetha [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Med, Div Resp & Crit Care Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Physical rehabilitation; Systematic review; IMPACT; GAIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102693
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background: Physical disabilities become more common with advancing age. Rehabilitation restores function, maintaining independence for longer. However, the poor availability and accessibility of rehabilitation limits its clinical impact. Artificial Intelligence (AI) guided interventions have improved many domains of healthcare, but whether rehabilitation can benefit from AI remains unclear.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology tested in the clinical setting to understand: 1) availability of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology; 2) its clinical effect; 3) and the barriers and facilitators to implementation. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index (Web of Science), CIRRIE (now NARIC), and OpenGrey.Results: We identified 9054 articles and included 28 projects. AI solutions spanned five categories: App-based systems, robotic devices that replace function, robotic devices that restore function, gaming systems and wearables. We identified five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated outcomes relating to physical function, activity, pain, and health-related quality of life. The clinical effects were inconsistent. Implementation barriers included technology literacy, reliability, and user fatigue. Enablers included greater access to rehabilitation programmes, remote monitoring of progress, reduction in manpower requirements and lower cost.Conclusion: Application of AI in physical rehabilitation is a growing field, but clinical effects have yet to be studied rigorously. Developers must strive to conduct robust clinical evaluations in the real-world setting and appraise post implementation experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review
    Podina, Nicoleta
    Gheorghe, Elena Codruta
    Constantin, Alina
    Cazacu, Irina
    Croitoru, Vlad
    Gheorghe, Cristian
    Balaban, Daniel Vasile
    Jinga, Mariana
    Tieranu, Cristian George
    Saftoiu, Adrian
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, 13 (01) : 55 - 77
  • [32] Artificial intelligence in cardiac surgery: A systematic review
    Sulague, Ralf Martz
    Beloy, Francis Joshua
    Medina, Jillian Reeze
    Mortalla, Edward Daniel
    Cartojano, Thea Danielle
    Macapagal, Sharina
    Kpodonu, Jacques
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (09) : 2073 - 2089
  • [33] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USE IN ONCOLOGY
    Phillips, Ruth
    Bradley, Sarah
    Jani, Janvi
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2024, 51 (02)
  • [34] Artificial intelligence in retail - a systematic literature review
    Heins, Caroline
    FORESIGHT, 2023, 25 (02): : 264 - 286
  • [35] Artificial intelligence in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: a systematic review
    Bektas, Mustafa
    Zonderhuis, Babs M.
    Marquering, Henk A.
    Pereira, Jaime Costa
    Burchell, George L.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SURGERY, 2022, 2 (03): : 132 - 143
  • [36] Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Peng Jin
    Xiaoyan Ji
    Wenzhe Kang
    Yang Li
    Hao Liu
    Fuhai Ma
    Shuai Ma
    Haitao Hu
    Weikun Li
    Yantao Tian
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020, 146 : 2339 - 2350
  • [37] Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Jin, Peng
    Ji, Xiaoyan
    Kang, Wenzhe
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Hao
    Ma, Fuhai
    Ma, Shuai
    Hu, Haitao
    Li, Weikun
    Tian, Yantao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (09) : 2339 - 2350
  • [38] A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments
    Bernd Carsten Stahl
    Josephina Antoniou
    Nitika Bhalla
    Laurence Brooks
    Philip Jansen
    Blerta Lindqvist
    Alexey Kirichenko
    Samuel Marchal
    Rowena Rodrigues
    Nicole Santiago
    Zuzanna Warso
    David Wright
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56 : 12799 - 12831
  • [39] Systematic Review On the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Brachytherapy
    Theeler, J.
    Kim, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E199 - E199
  • [40] Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review
    O'Connor, Siobhan
    Yan, Yongyang
    Thilo, Friederike J. S.
    Felzmann, Heike
    Dowding, Dawn
    Lee, Jung Jae
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (13-14) : 2951 - 2968