Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review

被引:15
|
作者
Sumner, Jennifer [2 ,5 ]
Lim, Hui Wen [2 ]
Chong, Lin Siew [2 ]
Bundele, Anjali [2 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Amartya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kayambu, Geetha [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Med, Div Resp & Crit Care Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Physical rehabilitation; Systematic review; IMPACT; GAIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102693
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background: Physical disabilities become more common with advancing age. Rehabilitation restores function, maintaining independence for longer. However, the poor availability and accessibility of rehabilitation limits its clinical impact. Artificial Intelligence (AI) guided interventions have improved many domains of healthcare, but whether rehabilitation can benefit from AI remains unclear.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology tested in the clinical setting to understand: 1) availability of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology; 2) its clinical effect; 3) and the barriers and facilitators to implementation. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index (Web of Science), CIRRIE (now NARIC), and OpenGrey.Results: We identified 9054 articles and included 28 projects. AI solutions spanned five categories: App-based systems, robotic devices that replace function, robotic devices that restore function, gaming systems and wearables. We identified five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated outcomes relating to physical function, activity, pain, and health-related quality of life. The clinical effects were inconsistent. Implementation barriers included technology literacy, reliability, and user fatigue. Enablers included greater access to rehabilitation programmes, remote monitoring of progress, reduction in manpower requirements and lower cost.Conclusion: Application of AI in physical rehabilitation is a growing field, but clinical effects have yet to be studied rigorously. Developers must strive to conduct robust clinical evaluations in the real-world setting and appraise post implementation experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulation and Artificial Intelligence in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review
    Eldaly, Abdullah S.
    Avila, Francisco R.
    Torres-Guzman, Ricardo A.
    Maita, Karla
    Garcia, John P.
    Palmieri Serrano, Luiza
    Forte, Antonio J.
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (05) : 2368 - 2377
  • [22] Artificial Intelligence in the administration of justice: A systematic review
    Padilla, Juan Fernando Deza
    REVISTA DE CLIMATOLOGIA, 2023, 23 : 1114 - 1119
  • [23] Artificial intelligence in the detection of choledocholithiasis: a systematic review
    Blum, Joshua
    Wood, Lewis
    Turner, Richard
    HPB, 2025, 27 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [24] Simulation and Artificial Intelligence in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review
    Abdullah S. Eldaly
    Francisco R. Avila
    Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman
    Karla Maita
    John P. Garcia
    Luiza Palmieri Serrano
    Antonio J. Forte
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46 : 2368 - 2377
  • [25] Artificial intelligence in glaucoma progression: A systematic review
    Guirao-Navarro, Maria Concepcion
    Lim, Hong Kai
    Antunes, Diandra
    Suribhatla, Rhea
    Jutley, Gurjeet
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2024, 102
  • [26] A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer
    Van Booven, Derek J.
    Kuchakulla, Manish
    Pai, Raghav
    Frech, Fabio S.
    Ramasahayam, Reshna
    Reddy, Pritika
    Parmar, Madhumita
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Arora, Himanshu
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 31 - 39
  • [27] A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    Antoniou, Josephina
    Bhalla, Nitika
    Brooks, Laurence
    Jansen, Philip
    Lindqvist, Blerta
    Kirichenko, Alexey
    Marchal, Samuel
    Rodrigues, Rowena
    Santiago, Nicole
    Warso, Zuzanna
    Wright, David
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2023, 56 (11) : 12799 - 12831
  • [28] Use of Artificial Intelligence for Training: A Systematic Review
    Jiang, Nina
    Duffy, Vincent G.
    DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING AND APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT, DHM 2024, PT III, 2024, 14711 : 346 - 363
  • [29] Applications of artificial intelligence in anesthesia: A systematic review
    Kambale, Monika
    Jadhav, Sammita
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [30] Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Vasculitides: A Systematic Review
    Omar, Mahmud
    Agbareia, Reem
    Naffaa, Mohammad E.
    Watad, Abdulla
    Glicksberg, Benjamin S.
    Nadkarni, Girish N.
    Klang, Eyal
    ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2025, 7 (03)