Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review

被引:15
|
作者
Sumner, Jennifer [2 ,5 ]
Lim, Hui Wen [2 ]
Chong, Lin Siew [2 ]
Bundele, Anjali [2 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Amartya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kayambu, Geetha [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Med, Div Resp & Crit Care Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Physical rehabilitation; Systematic review; IMPACT; GAIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102693
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background: Physical disabilities become more common with advancing age. Rehabilitation restores function, maintaining independence for longer. However, the poor availability and accessibility of rehabilitation limits its clinical impact. Artificial Intelligence (AI) guided interventions have improved many domains of healthcare, but whether rehabilitation can benefit from AI remains unclear.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology tested in the clinical setting to understand: 1) availability of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology; 2) its clinical effect; 3) and the barriers and facilitators to implementation. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index (Web of Science), CIRRIE (now NARIC), and OpenGrey.Results: We identified 9054 articles and included 28 projects. AI solutions spanned five categories: App-based systems, robotic devices that replace function, robotic devices that restore function, gaming systems and wearables. We identified five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated outcomes relating to physical function, activity, pain, and health-related quality of life. The clinical effects were inconsistent. Implementation barriers included technology literacy, reliability, and user fatigue. Enablers included greater access to rehabilitation programmes, remote monitoring of progress, reduction in manpower requirements and lower cost.Conclusion: Application of AI in physical rehabilitation is a growing field, but clinical effects have yet to be studied rigorously. Developers must strive to conduct robust clinical evaluations in the real-world setting and appraise post implementation experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial Intelligence for skeleton-based physical rehabilitation action evaluation: A systematic review
    Sardari, Sara
    Sharifzadeh, Sara
    Daneshkhah, Alireza
    Nakisa, Bahareh
    Loke, Seng W.
    Palade, Vasile
    Duncan, Michael J.
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 158
  • [2] Harnessing artificial intelligence in cardiac rehabilitation, a systematic review
    Sotirakos, Sara
    Fouda, Basem
    Mohamed Razif, Noor Adeebah
    Cribben, Niall
    Mulhall, Cormac
    O'Byrne, Aisling
    Moran, Bridget
    Connolly, Ruairi
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (02) : 154 - 164
  • [3] Application of artificial intelligence in physical education: a systematic review
    Tong Zhou
    Xingliang Wu
    Yudong Wang
    Yilei Wang
    Shunan Zhang
    Education and Information Technologies, 2024, 29 : 8203 - 8220
  • [4] Application of artificial intelligence in physical education: a systematic review
    Zhou, Tong
    Wu, Xingliang
    Wang, Yudong
    Wang, Yilei
    Zhang, Shunan
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (07) : 8203 - 8220
  • [5] The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Future Rehabilitation Services: A Systematic Literature Review
    Mennella, Ciro
    Maniscalco, Umberto
    De Pietro, Giuseppe
    Esposito, Massimo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 11024 - 11043
  • [6] Adaptation, Artificial Intelligence, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Barry, Daniel T.
    PM&R, 2018, 10 (09) : S131 - S143
  • [7] Wearable Sensors and Artificial Intelligence for Physical Ergonomics: A Systematic Review of Literature
    Donisi, Leandro
    Cesarelli, Giuseppe
    Pisani, Noemi
    Ponsiglione, Alfonso Maria
    Ricciardi, Carlo
    Capodaglio, Edda
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence and Race: a Systematic Review
    Intahchomphoo, Channarong
    Gundersen, Odd Erik
    LEGAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20 (02) : 74 - 84
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in dermatopathology: a systematic review
    Lalmalani, Roshni Mahesh
    Lim, Clarissa Xin Yu
    Oh, Choon Chiat
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 50 (02) : 251 - 259
  • [10] Artificial intelligence in melanoma: A systematic review
    Zhang, Shu
    Wang, Yuanzhuo
    Zheng, Qingyue
    Li, Jiarui
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 21 (11) : 5993 - 6004